1 tracks damaged meaning the track was hit in the screenshot which was posted earlier.
2 my comment has literally nothing to do with the track and is specifically about you choosing to ignore the fact that the autoloaders for NATO, tracks and volumetric all soak damage.
As even panther said… a person whom if you read i have also disagreed with consistently.
Every tank has very exploitable weakpoints if you know them.
Thats part of learning the game mate.
No they arent.
Breach them, then either shoot the turret ring, drivers hatch, or shoot through the roof.
No i mean it as they had holes in their armour, I have on my old laptop screenshots / clips.of even m774 going through the UFP on my Vt4A1 and such.
Eh, it means you can make more errors in situations true and bail easier, but the bvm as my point was can put more pressure on frontally.
Not really, that’s extremely situational to say.
It’s not better but i do actually feel the same and was proved wrong with various manners.
Its not the opposite at all.
Most BVM users are idiots same story as Ger and US .
Ive taken out plenty in my VT4A1, doesn’t mean that the BVM doesn’t nuke it fairly easily.
In game they sacrifice armour for extra mobility.
Worse round
Worse armour
Worse reload
Dude almost every tank has armor holes in this game, my Leclerc got 50called from front couple years ago, this is not something special by any means.
I disagree, both tanks can put same amount of pressure, in fact WZ can put more due to its overall better mobility.
Not even close, if you fk up in both tanks you will be able to get out from sticky situations while using Russian tanks, meanwhile WZ can simply reverse its way.
Dude BVM has one of the worst turret protection in this game. Its based T-80B armor slapped with Relikt and even then has huge gaps between base armor and ERA, not to mention era coverage on turret its pretty trash compare to WZ.
It has nothing to do with player but vehicles design as I explained above.
Same round.
Similiar protection, in fact WZ offers better protection because of its turret compare to BVM.
Compensated by reverse speed which same cant be said for Russian tanks.
Better mobility but slower reload meaning less firepower overall.
Numerically its able to apply less direct pressure.
Could say its better for flanking, or shoot at scoot.
True there, if you can reverse.
Though 11 kmph is pathetic it can at least get you out a situation faster than the pther T series.
I know mate. Thats my point but with the armour holes on the Wz if they havent been fixed you used to be able to shoot basically clean through its turret armour.
It is. It has the best armor in the game, only being rivalled by T-90M, which trades far too much to get its armor to be a good tank.
Yes. By far.
Yes.
Yes.
Driver port. They also heavily struggle to hide their LFP due to lack of depression. NATO tanks are also largely immune when just their turrets are showing, unless you shoot the breach, which goes for RU tanks as well.
I’m not going to indulge in wehraboo nonsense tbh.
oops!
Apparently the ammo belt that connects point A (Ammo rack) and Point B (autocannon) are actually 2 belts with bluetooth tech and can’t be ammo racked!
Well now f&·$% you and your blow out panels because there is a hard coded chance that they won’t work and they will kill your crew, based on loader openin the hatch! Even if you haven’t fired a round in 5 minutes!
Take it from me, you are literally arguing with people who will put their entire identity on Russian Bias. Even if you found solid proof. At the end of the day it’s a waste of time proving anything when they will find the smallest flaw and cling to it from 99% of evidence.
You are better of proving water is wet than talking to people on forums is what I’ve learned. It’s a video game at the end of the day.
Listen now, pro player! I’m talking about the characteristics of the machines, which have absolutely nothing to do with your amazing stats. I honestly don’t care how great of a player you are! If we believe your statistics, you win around 60 out of 100 games. I have entire days where the game puts me with people who never even leave the spawn zone. But apparently you either never get matches like that, or you wipe out the entire enemy team and carry every 6 out of 10 games!
Anyway, I don’t care about statistics. You might be an incredible player, but you’re not very smart. For example, in the Russian tech tree there’s a 14.7 aircraft, while in the American one there isn’t. The best fighter jets in the world are American, and that’s not some stupid statistic from a stupid person. I was still a student when the F-22 was being developed, and the Su-57 still isn’t fully in service yet — and I’m almost 40 years old. The F-22 is still the best fighter jet! Yet the Su-57 will enter the game and somehow be better than the F-22!
Have a nice life and enjoy the game! I wish you over a 90% win rate in your statistics!
