Vikhrs will be meta. Hellfires on other hand will have fun time dealing with s1, mamba and other stuff
Likely, but i’d rather have them, since they’ve been nerfed to guiding a max amount of two at a time (and tbf, this is more’so that when the first one is in its terminal phase of basically impacting the target, that you get to fire the second), rather than unlimited like some years back.
Of course, still much better than the current LMURs and JAGM-IRs.
Russia has :
- LMURs which have perfect top-down approach (try to hide behind a very big and tall rock / tall wall, you’ll still be perfectly and perpendicularly hit from the top)
NATO has :
- Spikes and PARS which literally go anywhere but onto the target (what’s up with that ? heli Spikes/PARS literally hit 50 meters in front/behind/next to the target, go up in the sky and hit the moon, … I mean why ?)
- JAGMs which are just as bad and need 2-4 missiles to destroy a russian MBT/SPAA
BALANCED Thunder
2 Likes
No I’m saying Gaijin chose to make Taiwan part of China while it’s obviously a hot subject out there, and definitely not settled worldwide atm.
Kinda biased to admit to Chinee people Taiwan is indeed part of China isn’t it.
Is it 2? I recall winning some free s1 user by sending 3 vikhrs at them
When I play my Ka-50, I can guide only 2, and if i send out the 2nd one out too early, the first one losses the “lock” and just falls out of the sky so idk.
PTSD flashbacks from when Lennox was still around haunting the top tier sim community.
2 Likes
Mb I could guide them because guy got first missile. Need to check that once I get to pc
True, but we all know this will not happen anyway.
The only true solution. FnF is honestly more of a problem than LDIRCM.
2 Likes
Bet they will release that and the russian armor, and that russian players will be able to tank 30 rounds as they do in grb
“Yes but they have fat legs and can’t aim at their feet so it’s balanced”
2 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
He reported my last comment lol it’s been taken down
2 Likes
Is it? Compare to Z-10 AH64E barely played by community yet it has worse stats.
You should check the stats before making such comment.
Also keep in mind M1A2T has 0.20-22 better K/D ratio than ZTZ-99A/WZ which shows despite their much worse aspects they can somehow keep up with it.
It seems rather than Abrams bein much better its the Chinese players that has better performance than average warthunder player.
3 Likes
0.2-0.22 K/D is still a significant amount when talking about global average K/D.
Over WZ1001/ZTZ99? It is significantly better. There’s a good argument for Abrams being the best MBT in the game and WZ/ZTZ are among the bottom ones.
I kind of forgot they actually gave the Z-10ME it’s good missile. My memory usually default to Z-10ME when it only had it’s garbage HE ATGM.
In that case the ZTZ99A/WZ1001/VT-4A1 must be truely bad vehicles, if the chinese players are supposedly better than average can only get those stats in it.
Or we can just give the Abrams the credit it deserves and admit that it’s among the best MBTs in game, only really behind the 2A7s/122s.
(I do agree though that Chinese players are better than US players on average)
Happens all the time to me too. Either he has a couple of alts reporting or he has a fanclub that can’t handle him being called out.
2 Likes
They dont, especially WZ10001.
While it has same reload that T-90M has its mobility saves it skin a lot.
Due to having same reverse capabilities that NATO tanks has it can get out sticky situations pretty fast.
Abrams was always good no matter what people claimed, its just that some people hyping too much while completely neglecting its actual problems so naturally people who are not use to overcome these weaknesses complains.
Both side are actually right on certain aspect so saying “muh its trash” or “muh its perfect and doesnt need anything” are both false claims (I know you express Abrams problems usually, I’m talking about certain people).
4 Likes
ODL from time to time is fine, we all have a frustrating day and a team half dead in the first 2 minutes where we already know where the game is going
I’m the kind of fool that first spawns AA and therefore has a lot of time to just observe the match when no air target is around. I can make 3 observations :
- 3-4 people ODL in early stages in the match will usually lead to a loss on the rest of the match, especially if the enemy team does not die / respawns. If the person ODLing had some skills it’s even worse, because that one player had more leverage on the match result compared to the avg joe. Take BMD4 nuke rushers for example : you have one skilled guy gone in 1 minute if his rush fails instead of him respawning and helping the team.
- people respawning but never taking into account someone having been pinged 10 times on the map, therefore giving him a free nuke
- while i play early AA, 2 thing can happen :
- either the enemy team spawns scout drones or early helis. In this case my first spawn is not in vain : i make them lose a lot of SP and deny their ability to scout from the sky
- if they don’t spawn any air, then my absence on the battlefield can still be felt, even if i’m only one person
All that to say that yes, consistantly ODLing will have an impact on your WR, partially because 1/16 of your team gone in the first few minutes has already an impact, but also because you are not the only one doing it.
1 Like