Yet here we are with actual stats that shows having better tanks doesn’t give you easy access to win, which is why this argument is stupid from the beginning.
You can have the best tank in the world but as long as you dont have dominant line-up you will loose eventually which is what happens in last couple months.
With recent additions Russia became so opressive that despite having mid/decent tanks they stomprolf the enemy team most of the time.
Not to mention since you dont face solely Russia but face Russia with mixed NATO nations situation becomes even worse.
There is not debating whether NATO has better tanks or not, Russia has the most complete line-up with busted vehicles which lets them rule the battlefield with help of other nations.
The talk I saw on the forum was like
“Russia OP!!!" "Yes Russia OP but they tanks no reversing, Russia tanks is weak "
“They have better armor, It’s not needed reversing”** "Yes but tthey tanks no reversing Russia tanks is weak "
“Russia air and spaa power too OP” "Yes but tthey tanks no reversing Russia tanks is weak "(look like it seems that they should join more OP air)
“NATO average win rate only 40%” “Yes but tthey tanks no reversing Russia tanks is weak .LOOK! Leopard 2A7 surprisingly have 1.41 average KD!!! Far better weak role T80BVM 1.36 average KD!!!This is not fair to the Russia tanks !!!”
“BMPT OP” “11.7 Average KD 1.59 No OP ,Only Leopards M1s OP!”
That’s because the only argument ru mains ever had - is switching topics to somewhere they can use a half truth (sometimes just plain lie) method to just derail a whole conversation.
„I’m not one of those people who sit through an entire match just to get 2 kills. I’d rather fail three times trying to capture a point — even without earning any score while neutralizing it — so that later some stat-padder can take it easily, which in most cases would actually secure the victory!”
MiG21 bis has been quite fun up till now, not as good as i thought it was gonna be due to full uptiers to 12.0, but other than that its been pretty fun.
As NATO teams loose 8 times out of 10 against Russia, it’s hard to get more than 1-2k xp per game and get a proper lineup, ngl.
EDIT : oh and the U.S. still don’t have the LAV-25 thus no proper IFV at top tier, so there is that. Kinda hard when every NATO vehicle given is dogwater.
I hate to be that guy, but the LAV-25 is arguably worse than the M1296 in quite a few areas. So if you expect that thing to be top tier you’ll be very dissapointed. 9.3 capable at the very highest for the in servive variants.
Just release whatever modern IFV the U.S. have rn which has missile launchers and be done with it
Import a foreign IFV with missile launchers into the U.S. TT, or make up a fake vehicle puting a launcher on it if it’s a necessity. The point is balance here, people have had enough seeing green russian winrates everywhere in top tier BRs.
