56.2% winrate with 36% of games played, absolutely perfectly balanced. No bias here lads.
2 Likes
Yet here we are with actual stats that shows having better tanks doesn’t give you easy access to win, which is why this argument is stupid from the beginning.
You can have the best tank in the world but as long as you dont have dominant line-up you will loose eventually which is what happens in last couple months.
With recent additions Russia became so opressive that despite having mid/decent tanks they stomprolf the enemy team most of the time.
Not to mention since you dont face solely Russia but face Russia with mixed NATO nations situation becomes even worse.
There is not debating whether NATO has better tanks or not, Russia has the most complete line-up with busted vehicles which lets them rule the battlefield with help of other nations.
Fighting against a Russia-Germany-Sweden at close the top tier is an incredibly miserable experience that’s for sure
Really good Leopard 2s backed up with an assortment of Russian nonsense makes for a sad situation for an opposing team
2 Likes
Hey completely unrelated but finally almost have the MiG23 MLD to try out, see how the claimed bias holds up on it after so many nerfs
mld is probably the best 11.7. i have the ml and its really good, mld has a better rwr and flight model
3 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
The talk I saw on the forum was like
“Russia OP!!!"
"Yes Russia OP but they tanks no reversing, Russia tanks is weak "
“They have better armor, It’s not needed reversing”**
"Yes but tthey tanks no reversing Russia tanks is weak "
“Russia air and spaa power too OP”
"Yes but tthey tanks no reversing Russia tanks is weak "(look like it seems that they should join more OP air)
“NATO average win rate only 40%”
“Yes but tthey tanks no reversing Russia tanks is weak .LOOK! Leopard 2A7 surprisingly have 1.41 average KD!!! Far better weak role T80BVM 1.36 average KD!!!This is not fair to the Russia tanks !!!”
“BMPT OP”
“11.7 Average KD 1.59 No OP ,Only Leopards M1s OP!”
6 Likes
That’s because the only argument ru mains ever had - is switching topics to somewhere they can use a half truth (sometimes just plain lie) method to just derail a whole conversation.
6 Likes
„I’m not one of those people who sit through an entire match just to get 2 kills. I’d rather fail three times trying to capture a point — even without earning any score while neutralizing it — so that later some stat-padder can take it easily, which in most cases would actually secure the victory!”
1 Like
“noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo! russian tanks have no reverse speed and gun depression, russia is weak and the NATO is better.”
BMPTs are OP
“NATO is weak, russia number one”
4 Likes
The F-22’s radar is stealthier. The Su-57’s is powerful but highly demasking.
“10.7 Russia : 57% winrate”
More like 77% winrate, they win everytime lul
1 Like
MiG21 bis has been quite fun up till now, not as good as i thought it was gonna be due to full uptiers to 12.0, but other than that its been pretty fun.
You still basically 1 death leaving at that BR or have you finally made a lineup to actually contribute to your team.
As NATO teams loose 8 times out of 10 against Russia, it’s hard to get more than 1-2k xp per game and get a proper lineup, ngl.
EDIT : oh and the U.S. still don’t have the LAV-25 thus no proper IFV at top tier, so there is that. Kinda hard when every NATO vehicle given is dogwater.
1 Like
The lav 25 is literally worse than the m1296 …
2 Likes
I hate to be that guy, but the LAV-25 is arguably worse than the M1296 in quite a few areas. So if you expect that thing to be top tier you’ll be very dissapointed. 9.3 capable at the very highest for the in servive variants.
2 Likes
Unless they make up a variant with a missile launcher or something
And don’t give it the horrible bushmaster
Funny how i don’t lose 8 of 10 games when i play Nato.