Same thing ? No you just incompetent.
By this logic aim9 = aim7 = aim120. Result is same, target will be hit.
1 Like
I think it would be unfair to not mention that USA gets hstvl and ags at 10_2 ground sim.
You can look it up here:
1 Like
Omg
And A-6E TRAM vs OSA…
Its ever-so-slightly faster, + 4km/h and +0.3 HP/T. Not enough of a difference to note.
Arguably worse, 3 round ready rack and then you’re down to a 7.1? 7.5? I don’t know xd reload. Better round is nice but not worth the reload hit.
1 Like
I really don’t get why they don’t just make 10_2 a 10.7 max lineup, maybe with some exceptions like like the T-80UD/BE still being allowed.
Thunderskill data. Absolutely garbage site.
2 Likes
Yeah both were oversights on my end. I looked at the German TT 2A4 on the wiki for HP/ton, forgetting that this version has the dozer and thus increased weight on the wiki.
I also forgot about the ready rack.
1 Like
Fair enough
1 Like
56.2% winrate with 36% of games played, absolutely perfectly balanced. No bias here lads.
2 Likes
Yet here we are with actual stats that shows having better tanks doesn’t give you easy access to win, which is why this argument is stupid from the beginning.
You can have the best tank in the world but as long as you dont have dominant line-up you will loose eventually which is what happens in last couple months.
With recent additions Russia became so opressive that despite having mid/decent tanks they stomprolf the enemy team most of the time.
Not to mention since you dont face solely Russia but face Russia with mixed NATO nations situation becomes even worse.
There is not debating whether NATO has better tanks or not, Russia has the most complete line-up with busted vehicles which lets them rule the battlefield with help of other nations.
Fighting against a Russia-Germany-Sweden at close the top tier is an incredibly miserable experience that’s for sure
Really good Leopard 2s backed up with an assortment of Russian nonsense makes for a sad situation for an opposing team
2 Likes
Hey completely unrelated but finally almost have the MiG23 MLD to try out, see how the claimed bias holds up on it after so many nerfs
mld is probably the best 11.7. i have the ml and its really good, mld has a better rwr and flight model
3 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
The talk I saw on the forum was like
“Russia OP!!!"
"Yes Russia OP but they tanks no reversing, Russia tanks is weak "
“They have better armor, It’s not needed reversing”**
"Yes but tthey tanks no reversing Russia tanks is weak "
“Russia air and spaa power too OP”
"Yes but tthey tanks no reversing Russia tanks is weak "(look like it seems that they should join more OP air)
“NATO average win rate only 40%”
“Yes but tthey tanks no reversing Russia tanks is weak .LOOK! Leopard 2A7 surprisingly have 1.41 average KD!!! Far better weak role T80BVM 1.36 average KD!!!This is not fair to the Russia tanks !!!”
“BMPT OP”
“11.7 Average KD 1.59 No OP ,Only Leopards M1s OP!”
6 Likes
That’s because the only argument ru mains ever had - is switching topics to somewhere they can use a half truth (sometimes just plain lie) method to just derail a whole conversation.
6 Likes
„I’m not one of those people who sit through an entire match just to get 2 kills. I’d rather fail three times trying to capture a point — even without earning any score while neutralizing it — so that later some stat-padder can take it easily, which in most cases would actually secure the victory!”
1 Like