No one teach you reading ability ? look like you only have middle school level
1 Like
Russian Wunderwaffe?
???
2 Likes
Are there blast doors that don’t have their armor spall?
Cause your screenshot proves there’s no double standards with autoloaders.
1 Like
There is no double standard with bustle autoloaders, carousel autoloaders on the other hand…
The double standard is about which modules spall and which dont.
Hmm in that case I wonder why Gaijin decide to add BMPT, Pantsir SM, LMUR and KH-38MT with their current stats.
Looks like your information is outdated for almost 5 years, wake up buddy Russia is in such pathetic state they reopened T-80 factory and redeploying T-55’s.
1 Like
Again, where is the double standard?
Your screenshot shows that no autoloaders generate spalling thus far.
All you’ve shown is armor generates spalling, which is universal across all tanks.
Your post even states that it’s the armor that’s spalling, and not the autoloader.
Armor isn’t a module, it’s just armor.
Is that the reason why I have most vehicles in Russian tree?
I love Russian equipments, Soviet/Russia Era indeed produced such gorgeous and powerful machines but I’m also not stupid to ignore how some of them artificially buffed to the point where they straight up ignore laws of physics.
Can you please make the slightest effort and look at the picture properly?
The blast door is modeled as part of the bustle autoloader module not as additional armor. Like for example the additional 20mm steel ring on the T90M
No part of the carousel creates spall despite being metal as well.
Ah yes my favorite SAM missile that straight up ignores law of physics, totally accurate and realistic comrade )))))
1 Like
The armor is not modeled as part of the autoloader module on Leclerc.
They are two separate pieces, which is shown in your screenshot.
Here’s another screenshot showing them as separate as well:
And correct, no part of the Leclerc’s autoloader generates spalling.
Only armor does, and armor isn’t an autoloader.
Now, now - let’s not be rude. I’m sure it’ll do every bit as well as their previous high-performance SAMs. Like this BUK for example…
4 Likes
Why are you deceiving and slandering me?
First, what difference does it make what I or anyone else thinks if there are documents? Documents don’t reflect personal opinions.
Second, I never said the Duplet was inferior to the K-5.
Third, I never published “conflict sources.” What does that even mean?
Fourth, no source on the Leclerc’s reloading time mentions barrel elevation.
Fifth, the gun’s elevation and depression time are included in the reload time for autoloaders; otherwise, the T-64/80 would have a reload time of ~5 seconds.
Let me remind you of the sources I used:
The first and second is a manufacturer’s brochure. The other two are very authoritative books. The author of the first is apparently one of the tank’s creators.
Spoiler
2 Likes
“Finally I spaded my f111f, time to try it out in grb. Surely nothing scary will happen if m1a1 costs 100sp right?”
A terrifying presence has entered the room…
Spoiler
Youtube link didnt work for some reason
Do you know how blowout panels work ?
I do. Do you know how reading works?
@H_ngma_
Internal armor plating doesn’t show up in all cases.
This is a known issue with the x-ray system.
On top of that, as my screenshot proves, the autoloader module is well behind the armor plate that you falsely claim isn’t present when it obviously is to everyone that read my post:
The fact you keep claiming armor is autoloaders…
He does, but he’s ignoring evidence.
Elevation times are not included to reload times and T-80 certainly cannot achieve 5 second sustain reload. Autoloader has to physically rotate in order to load next shell which takes more than 5 seconds.
You’re talking about static reload time while ignoring the part where Leclerc achieved 6 second reload on the move.
Even your sources states that.
Not to mention all sources you posted take average time to reload in Leclerc which includes barrel raising, if you dont know this such a simple fact then there is no reason to talk.
You might not openly said it but that doesn’t change what you tried to imply on OPLOT thread, lets not try to play naive in here.
I think he was also the joker who was at one point crayoning all over the Challenger threads.
I’d pay him little heed personally. The guy has a bit of a cob on for things not produced by the Tomsk Tractor Factory. =)
Would you look at that, it even shows up in the x-ray.
I didn’t have internal armor on my x-ray when I was looking at Leclerc earlier myself, and it appears Ngma didn’t either.