Tunguska is a missilebot platform for a long while now.
Actually killing something at medium-long ranges is a challenge, even strike drones can roll out of your missile at any decent range.
1 Like
Where are your unprecedented results on the vehicle (su30sm/sm2) that you consider stronger than all others and requires to increase br’s?
In rb not by a wide marging. Its better but a skilled rafale player should be able to deal with a su30sm2. The problem is everyone else that isnt a rafale or ef2k.
3 Likes
You’re implying it takes skill to deal with a Su-30SM2. A skilled Su-30SM2 player is untouchable and a Rafale wouldn’t be able to do much against a flying Iron Dome that launches R-77-1 in notches. It is better by a wide margin
The Su-30SM2 is the outlier in this case as its 240 degree ESA scan radar allows it to notch and launch R-77-1 being completely defensive and maintaining offensive pressure that no other jet can match. The EF-2000 (AESA) and JAS-39E that both have the 200 degree ESA radars can do the same but not nearly to the same extent as the AIM-120B/C-5 doesn’t have the same high off-bore launch angles that R-77-1 and MICA-EM can utilize; The Engine performance on the Su-30SM2 is another plus. As for both the Su-30s and why I’d increase both their BR’s respectively the R-77-1 is a top 3 missile in War Thunder right now on the likes of the MICA-EM and AIM-120D and while both those missiles are harder to notch the R-77-1 gets the best of both worlds with the close range performance of a MICA-EM and the energy of an AIM-120 in the medium range. The R-77-1 is also really good for Iron Dome on both jets which does work in Air RB and moreso in Sim
I have shot Type 90/10 and Leclerc autoloaders and have had them survive it without an issue far more than RU tanks.
Their ammo doesn’t even blow out, it just doesn’t care.
It doesn’t even have to be an autoloader, it can be just a bustle rack too.
Literally in his autoloader, but it doesnt mind.
1 Like
Mhm of course you have buddy
Why exactly would the autoloader explode if you don’t hit ammo with the dart or spall?
1 Like
I’ll grab some clips later. But i’m sure many people can attest to this.
That was a breach shot into the autoloader.
Cool neither of those are actually explosive you know
What are you saying? Its quite literally a full rack.
Did your dart or the spall hit any ammo? No? Then case closed
Huh? The dart is INSIDE THE AUTOLOADER? You know, where all the ammo resides?
1 Like
And did the dart hit any ammo in both your examples? No it didn’t.
Not my fault that you can’t read and actually understand what my initial comment was about.
There is a literal consistent difference in how spalling works between internal models and you come around the corner with some whataboutism stuff. But I guess digressing instead of staying on topic is the classic rubot move these days
Except it quite literally did? First clip shows this?
Either you are blind or ragebaiting.
2nd clip my ammo vanished but I did not die, even though the blast door was breached.
3rd image the dart literally entered his autoloader and quite a bit of spall hit the ammo, but it did not take any damage.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
4 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Ironic considering you see clear evidence of NATO bustles being able to absorb a shot and say “you just didn’t hit the ammo”.
1 Like
Well apparently you didn’t or at least the hit didn’t register for whatever reason.
That is actually not the same as a modeling difference.
I know that’s hard to understand but you might be able to if you try.
It did register though? Not for the image but in both clips the ammo is in fact affected. In the first one a round turns yellow and in the second I lose the bustle ammo.
I never said that carousel armor didn’t exist, but regardless they can produce the same outcome of the ammo not exploding.