Russian Bias in 2026?

[SadRIPer]

Wdym, if YOU get LAV-25 in US

1. YOU will get bushmaster M242 because that is what LAV-25 using.

So we already know lav-25 will be poop. What a surprise, I’m shocked

What does that helpful for BALANCING NATO

It would atleast balance NATO at the lav-25’s br, because it would bring nato a better ifv

when you americans will get that LAV-25 exculsively?

I hope not. But it wouldn’t be a problem, if other NATO IFVs got non-poop IFVs as well (all the spike/mmps which don’t work, all the poopmasters autocannons, …)

Tell us the truth. You want to replace russia with america and want to see America bias instead of Russian one
And you don’t give a damn about NATO.

Man I’m french (and a France main). Why on earth would I want to see America dominate more than France ? lmao

Plus, America is often teamed up with Russia at top tier grb, so it’d mean France would fight x2 bias at the same time. It would be hell

I really want to see all NATO vehicles being buffed lol (because they’re often teamed up all together at top tier grb). Preferably France first, but that ship has sailed

[Kievskiy_Minipig]

@Stockholm_Blend

Italians

Im wondering if something is going to be done about ghibli which somehow sits at higher br than tram in grb. Devs returned both at same time but ghibli feels like obvious scam.

[MiGoon_Fox-3]

@SadRIPer

shouldn’t be able to do that compared to NATO MBTs

Do you have proof for this statement?

@SadRIPer

EDIT 2 : Abrams front glacis not shattering apfsds-t and turret ring inaccuracies - #59 by office_chair

There are no sources for his statements.

@SadRIPer

Only NATO gets poop

Various examples of non-poop NATO things.

There’s more but I’m sure you don’t believe me

[Stockholm_Blend]

@SadRIPer

It would atleast balance NATO at the lav-25’s br, because it would bring nato a better ifv

How in the world giving LAV-25 to US giving balance on NATO-wise?

Especially when I probably going to have chance to fight against Bradley or LAV-25 while playing Warrior?

Same goddamn logics

when F-14A stormed
“MiG-23M also meta so we need to keep F-14A meta too”

when both F-15A and Su-27 storms 3rd gen
“R-27ER is worse than AIM-7M so shut up”

You are backstabbing nato

[SadRIPer]

Do you have proof for this statement?

It’s a balance problem

Russian vehicles should be fat and well armored, NATO vehicles should be light and less armored.

But it’s not even the case with the t-90m and bvm anymore. They’re both fast

There are no sources for his statements.

Abrams front glacis not shattering apfsds-t and turret ring inaccuracies

This is really just an issue with apfsds in general, because other tanks will also receive buffs from this, while the abrams will definitely see the most benefit, I still think this will be a overall improvement for the game that claims to be “one of the most realistic tank and plane games.” First off, the abrams glacis (I may use ufp interchangeably) is 32.8mm at a 82.5* angle. The turret ring is actually 50.8mm, but due to overlapping plates and the fact that the ring is not exposed its actua…

Abrams front glacis not shattering apfsds-t and turret ring inaccuracies

Should add that such turret ring fixes were accepted all the way back on the old forums, yet changes have yet to come forth, namely that the M1IP and M1 have a different turret ring damage model which is currently superior to the M1A1 and beyond because the latter’s DM does not actually match up with the model. I will also attach here the accepted turret ring reports that exist on the current report system. M1 Abrams (all subvariants) incorrect turret ring // Gaijin.net // Issues M1 Abrams ta…

And what is that man ? Those are literally the 2 top posts of the thread lol

If you want to blindly defend Russia, at least make the efforts man

[MiGoon_Fox-3]

True as well, bro complains about Russian bias but can only talk about america besides Russia.

typical american

[MiGoon_Fox-3]

@SadRIPer

They’re both fast

try holding S

[SadRIPer]

Other NATO nations are sometimes (often) teamed up with the US lol

But I’m not saying other NATO nations shouldn’t be buffed as well. Of course they should

[SadRIPer]

1 - I’m a France main, I’m not american
2 - When did I only defend the US ? I defend all NATO nations
3 - I might defend the US more than any other NATO nations, only because :

• They have 1000 billions USD budget in their military (the biggest budget and military in the world). So it means the US, more than any other nation, should definitely NOT be poop
• I put 90 euros in the US one day, and I’m in pain right now. Would like to see a return on investment one day

[Stockholm_Blend]

@SadRIPer

They have 1000 billions USD budget in their military (the biggest budget and military in the world). So it means the US, more than any other nation, should definitely NOT be poop

This really sounds like Pax Americana or American bias ngl.

If you are really French, you sound more American than my American friend.

[SadRIPer]

I’m really french though

I cannot lie about the plain truth. Money is power. They have the biggest military in the world, what can I say. Let’s be honest, the only military which can eventually dominate the world someday would be the US, Russia or China. Forget about europe or other nations lol

You can’t compare their army to the italian army for example. And I’m saying that while also having italian origins

[MiGoon_Fox-3]

@SadRIPer

Other NATO nations are sometimes (often) teamed up with the US lol

from last month or so

[SadRIPer]

It changes depending the BRs

France fights Russia more, more often at top tier grb than at 9.7 for example

Your numbers might be a gross average throughout the BRs

EDIT : for example : USA with USSR… 25% only at top tier grb… is not true

[MiGoon_Fox-3]

first post has no sources cited, Lolman’s reports include one bug report which was fixed and one who’s sources are just images from news sites. I don’t have the mathematical knowhow to confirm the accuracy of the bug reporter’s statement (the bug reporter stated themselves that they don’t either)

The bug report may also be outdated thanks to the new internal modules.

The other two are stuck in “accepted” limbo just like so many other bug reports. Nothing special unfortunately. So many bug reports just end up like that regardless of which vehicle they’re for (besides rafale)

[MiGoon_Fox-3]

This is for top tier, I’ll post the source in a sec

Vehicle Performance at Top Tier Sixth Edition

Statistics for top tier ground battles gathered from replays. 3000 replays from the 8th - 17th of this month. Tanks

K/D

Cut off: 1500 Vehicle Ratio Data points Leopard 2A7HU 1.64 2672 Merkava Mk.4M 1.56 1830 Strv 122B+ 1.42 2986 M1A2T 1.41 6617 Black Night 1.38 1540 TKX 1.37 3413 Leopard 2A7V 1.35 12481 Strv 122B PLSS 1.35 1778 T-80BVM 1.30 27404 Type 10 1.30 4384 Challenger 2 OES 1.26 2000 BMPT 1.24 13929 Leclerc SXXI 1.24 1832 M1A2 SEP V2 1.23 8971 Centauro…

[SadRIPer]

Ok so there are sources, as some were accepted (provided sources for that)

[MiGoon_Fox-3]

As a rule I ignore sources coming from news sites.

Gaijin rarely accepts those as proof of anything unless it’s weapon loadouts iirc

[SadRIPer]

No.

USA only teamed up 25% of the time with Russia at 12.7 GRB, is absolutely false. They’re teamed up together way more often.

Same with Russia and the UK. They very often teamed up together at top tier grb

Some numbers look true (France does look teamed up 23% of the time with Russia at top tier grb. Russia and Germany 50%, looks good too), but some look weird.

[MiGoon_Fox-3]

@SadRIPer

USA only teamed up 25% of the time with Russia at 12.7 GRB, is absolutely false. They’re teamed up together way more often.

Same with Russia and the UK. They very often teamed up together at top tier grb

where’s your source?

[SadRIPer]

As a rule I ignore sources coming from news sites.

You make up your own rules, I make up mine.

I state what I see throughout thousands of top tier games. The UK, Italy, the US and Germany are often teamed up with Russia. The numbers don’t look right.