F-5C never had countermeasures IRL.
F-14 IRIAF with R-27 (radar couldn’t guide them)
AESA eurofighters aren’t even in production (iirc the double amraam rack is something they don’t use either)
gripen FM still overperforming Community Bug Reporting System
APDS was given to falcon and AMX-30DCA despite neither being able to fire it (removed now thank god)
TTD infinite spall liner turret cheek
F-15C GE AMBR racks are questionable, similar to Su-30 double racks I’d say
Somua has 150mm of fake armour
Ho-RI
Dutch leo 2s are supposed to have worse armour than German versions
AMX-32s have fake stabilisers
leclerc S1 has overperforming armour (should be worse than S2 for example)
So your counterpoints are:
-Things added on proven technical compatibility
-bugs
-stuff thats either already removed or Gaijin already stating itll be removed once the gap is closed
-stuff thats completely wrong to begin with like all armor on western tanks (but not to the benefit of any)
-and an old model Gajin hasnt updated
Do i have that right?
A very long list only to say bud doesn’t want his russian lineup to be nerfed, or is planing to farm Russia and doesn’t want his lineup to be nerfed at the end of the day
Bud only wants Russia to play against Russia in the end
No idea, not my area of interest and or expertise but that claim seems to be controversial at least?
Not really if the “better” armor is still massively underperforming compared to what it should be. All western modern armor is a complete joke anyway so small tidbits like this mean nothing.
I support a buff towards IIR missiles absolutely, but it could easily go too far.
Their state rn would already change the meta in air RB once they’re added to aircraft
The issue is that these missiles already will strongly affect air RB once added.
True IIR guidance would simply be too powerful for gameplay purposes.
Again, I support buffs, but ones that are reasonable.
IRIS-T for example does need its ability to intercept improved, simple preflaring shouldn’t be as effective as it is and LDIRCM shouldn’t be a magical forcefield.
I want gaijin to prioritize gameplay over realism, going too realistic results in the game just not being fun.
Imagine trying to play MiG-29 with realistic SPO-15 (good luck lmfao)
Sooner or later IIR missiles will come to top tier jets and like it or not Gaijin will be forced to model them as accurate as possible.
Fun fact the way you explained how to dodge IIR missile is actually one of the real life method.
Fine by me.
Sure then can I get my actual armor values on my NATO tank since they heavily underperforms, or is it also something special to Russian vehicles in this case?
Not my problem if Soviets couldn’t figure it how to operate both RWR and radar at the same time until they developed more modern systems.
I want gaijin to prioritize gameplay over realism, going too realistic results in the game just not being fun.
Sure, KH-38Ts that don’t even exist, helis not appearing on 12.7 SPAA radars when hovering, BMPT armor modeling, NATO MBT armor modeling, NATO MBT not having their most recent shells, Spike/MMP missiles not having a proper top-down approach, bushmasters not having their burst fire mode and so much more unrealistic things, do bring joy to this game
Nah you see those fictional buffs/ weapon systems needed because Russia suffers so much s/.
Fun fact despite their overperforming armor/ mobility on their tank Russian playerbase still suck when it comes to using them, the only way to win is to use broken platforms aka LMUR/KH-38 and fictional hypersonic missile launcher.
0 multipath height
real life accurate seekers on Fox-3s
rwr inaccuraccies
true, IRL flight performance (no more pulling consistent 9+g turns)
fuel being implemented for tanks
no more bino view when commander dies
All these realistic features would just not be enjoyable.
ABD? It doesnt change the fact that NATO top tier jets can actually pull 11-13G in real life with override mode while most Russian designs are hard lock to 9-10G’s at best case scenario.
