Ok so there are sources, as some were accepted (provided sources for that)
As a rule I ignore sources coming from news sites.
Gaijin rarely accepts those as proof of anything unless it’s weapon loadouts iirc
No.
USA only teamed up 25% of the time with Russia at 12.7 GRB, is absolutely false. They’re teamed up together way more often.
Same with Russia and the UK. They very often teamed up together at top tier grb
Some numbers look true (France does look teamed up 23% of the time with Russia at top tier grb. Russia and Germany 50%, looks good too), but some look weird.
where’s your source?
1 Like
As a rule I ignore sources coming from news sites.
You make up your own rules, I make up mine.
I state what I see throughout thousands of top tier games. The UK, Italy, the US and Germany are often teamed up with Russia. The numbers don’t look right.
If those numbers are accurate then top tier is even more cooked than i thought. Imagine russian winrates if they werent paired with the worst performing nation half the time and vice versa lol
2 Likes
Gaijin doesn’t accept sources from 3rd party sites.
You need primary sources (manuals and brochures) or multiple good secondary sources.
Oh, and show any calculations you have done to prove what you’re saying.
News sites are third party sources
You need primary sources (manuals and brochures)
When it comes to NATO, they’re considered “marketing lies”, conveniently
Russian bias really shines in 2nd battle of El Halamein, Attica and Mozdok!
Lol did i say it doesn’t have a reason to exist anymore? I said there are quite a few reasons you can pick up the F-15C Ge over the su30sm.
Surely your reading skills are good /s
You literally said nothing, “aim-120D isnt a buff” lmao.
So we ignoring GNSS that can help actually guide missile to target better than R-77-1. And even in the case better time to target, IOG drift being minimized actually helps when the target is maneuvering so both missiles will be on par as they have a better chance with datalink to adjust their course, so dont use that useless argument of better tti. And omg warhead lmao… the difference isnt even huge.
How many lies are you going to put up, whilst also spoke about pesa vs aesa performance. To which you ignored because you have nothing to say.
And the fact of Countermeasures is far superior in the GE.(again you ignored)
As expected you have no idea what youre talking about and you try to act smarter why not even giving a single reason or argument at all why x is not better or a buff.
If you want to type alot of words do it else where you know? Or spew nonsense i think its amusing.
He doesn’t have a source, he just pulls stuff out of his a**.
He only wants/counts evidence that proves his already established believes. Everything that conflicts with those believes is instantly wrong.
have you seen the buffs the rafale got for no real reason?
The French Rafale C F3 does not use a HMD IRL…
Every nation has this happen, every single one.
1 Like
Though I understand and agree that there is russian bias, but I just want to know, what can we do to make a change? Like will this post do anything at all? I am pretty sure gaijin will ignore this anyway.
1 Like
It was proven to be tested on the F3 tho just like the additional MICAs. Did it need those buffs on release? Absolutely not. But its also not remotely the same as russian vehicles getting stuff that doesnt exist or has no proof whatsoever to ever be relevant on that specific vehicle.
No other nation has this happen to them.
2 Likes
Exactly, if that would be the case Mitsubishi F-2 would’ve gotten experimental HMD that wasn’t even finished the tests.
1 Like
F-5C never had countermeasures IRL.
F-14 IRIAF with R-27 (radar couldn’t guide them)
AESA eurofighters aren’t even in production (iirc the double amraam rack is something they don’t use either)
gripen FM still overperforming Community Bug Reporting System
APDS was given to falcon and AMX-30DCA despite neither being able to fire it (removed now thank god)
TTD infinite spall liner turret cheek
F-15C GE AMBR racks are questionable, similar to Su-30 double racks I’d say
Somua has 150mm of fake armour
Ho-RI
Dutch leo 2s are supposed to have worse armour than German versions
AMX-32s have fake stabilisers
leclerc S1 has overperforming armour (should be worse than S2 for example)
where modules
1 Like
So your counterpoints are:
-Things added on proven technical compatibility
-bugs
-stuff thats either already removed or Gaijin already stating itll be removed once the gap is closed
-stuff thats completely wrong to begin with like all armor on western tanks (but not to the benefit of any)
-and an old model Gajin hasnt updated
Do i have that right?
2 Likes
R-27 on F-14 is technically compatible? (radar literally couldn’t guide the missile)
armour being too good isn’t a benefit to them?
1 Like
A very long list only to say bud doesn’t want his russian lineup to be nerfed, or is planing to farm Russia and doesn’t want his lineup to be nerfed at the end of the day
Bud only wants Russia to play against Russia in the end
