I’m not here as an expert with an opinion on rockets, having never tried one. Like you, I’m smarter.
I have First-Hand experience with more vehicles than you, do better than you in the same vehicles if not worse ones and communicate with people better than both of us who say the exact same things I do.
Oh btw:
What difference does it make what experience you have if it was only indirect?
The fact I:
- Do better than you
- Understand what makes x thing better/worse than y
- Have used more vehicles than you
- Have sources and different people to rely on to make sure my information is accurate
Am I arguing that I’m better? The question was for you. Okay, I get it, you have too much self-esteem. Typical forum warriors.
There are people who believe the earth is flat. Is their opinion correct?
My guy, MiGoon is not a forum warrior, and he is 100% right
This is literally MiGan Fox-3.
A TSS player and the go-to guy to watch for learning how to play top tier air.
Most good people at top tier learned something from him
You’re the flat-earther here
He’s live
At 3h30 approximately after the live begins, I asked him : “Hello Jon, do you think there is a russian bias at 12.7-13.0 GRB ? Also, do you feel like Russia wins large majority of top tier GRB games ?”
He answers “Yes at top tier GRB Russia is so bullshit right now… they have the best SPAAs the best CAS the best tanks, BMPT… that’s why I stopped playing top tier GRB, because Russia is so bullshit right now”
I’m not making up things, you can check. Even him says it
1 Like
Can you timestamp it
The live also did not begin at 3h30
I can’t, he’s live rn. The video redirects to a live
I didn’t say it began at 3h30, I said I posted the question 3h30 after the live started
If you listen closely, he didn’t say “tanks”, he meant BMPT.
He also never said there’s bias, he just said it’s bullshit.
While yes, it’s bullshit, it’s not bias.
Every nation has bullshit going for them
4 Likes
You don’t need ownership experience to have an opinion on a vehicle.
Otherwise all Russian bias claims could be defeated on that argument alone, since nearly all that make such claims have no experience in Soviet vehicles in-game.
I was telling people F-18A was OP weeks before I owned it, and when I got it I matched my Gripen KDR when the Gripen was OP.
Yes. But if you have vehicle, your statements get more reliability.
About this part, it sounds true but you should’ve warned yourself about generalisation.
I don’t think you need to tell this unless you want to say “I am skilled well, and I am so proud of myself” just like Michael in early seasons does.
Lastly, it is quite frustrating that you ignored ‘that’ comment.
Now seems you act more like Col Nathan Jessup instead of Toby.
“I want the truth” /s
If people with x vehicle (that are good players) agree with my statements even if I don’t I have x vehicle (but similar aircraft) I’d say my statements should be valid
1 Like
I didn’t mean to stab ya.
Your opinion is also valid if the owners of vehicles approve.
But people usually believe your opinion more if you have that vehicle directly.
I mean, I can make a take about Tornado IDS(1995) without owning it and relying more on GR.1 experience, but if I own IDS(1995), probably lads will be convinced a little bit more.
1 Like
KDR in a vacuum doesn’t matter, nor does skill outside consistency.
It’s why I didn’t mention the KDR itself, but instead mentioned another vehicle’s history it matched to.
It does not matter what KDR a player has in any vehicle; if they are consistent, then an OP vehicle will go above and beyond any margin of error that could exist [I like to say 0.5 KDR usually is a solid margin of error].
Not as good as a cross analysis, but a cross analysis gives a good proof for OP vehicles, and that proof can be used to learn how to do well in said OP vehicles where their record is well above one’s average.
Dubious. Pl8b and pl12(was) better than the r-77 and r73.
And whilst yeah hmd was and still is king at 13.7 the j11 has a better radar. Not sure about rwr coverage and i dont remember if it gets maws
So, you evaded that selective realism comment. And want to stay with KDA.
Selective debate after selective realism, very clever.
I don’t think pushing your standard to everyone is a good idea.
Anyway.
Colonel Alvis R. Wisla, why are you evading the debate that Gaijin have a rubberband-ish standard about applying realism to their loadouts?
We need to know.
Why?
Because “You cannot handle the truth.”?