Agreed here, the BMPT’s ammo rack does absolutely need a change.
Either make it internal or nuke turret mechanisms and electronics like on the PUMA
1 Like
So you’re going down the route of claiming MRMLs and R-77 dual pylons are fake. Sad.
Despite proof that shows otherwise.
That or you have double standards.
As for Mi-28NM, there are dozens of photos out there of all 4 pylons having AGMs equipped.
And without proof that the pylons aren’t wired for a type of universal serial data transfer, there’s nothing to say on the matter that isn’t conjecture.
It’s this same exact argument you’re using that someone else tried using to dismiss 4 pylons of JAGMs.
MiG-29 and R-73 vs R-27ER
Some player has common sense bro and they obtain those numbers easily by playing casually. If you are a busta then no matter how hard you sweat you would still remains a busta.
Like all those incompetent players who also lack of common sense typically find someone or something else to blame rather than themselves.
I meant more probably regarding the part where they can affect modern iir missiles like Iris t but yeah the part where one laser affects multiple missiles is for sure overperforming.
That’s the point. There’s no proof that the SU30SM can carry those extra missiles.
Again you can’t proof a negative. If anything then people would have to proof that it is indeed wired for a universal data transfer which there is none for.
No since there are first hand sources stating that the JAGM pylons are compatible with all pylons that work for hellfires, the LMUR doesn’t have that proof.
Not really sure what you’re trying to say?
iirc the only reason Gaijin sees the 27SM/30SM/30SM2 as able to use the dual pylons is “Technical Feasibility”, since there’s the same space between the engines on all the Flankers.
But yeah, It’s completely incorrect, since Dual Pylons have only ever been seen on Su-35S.
MiG-29 is an example of the double-sidedness of gaijin’s selective realism.
Gets R-27ERs which it never got and most likely couldn’t fire but no R-73s which is what the plane was known for
Oh that too absolutely.
LDIRCM is so disgusting rn
I’m all for technical feasibility as long as it’s done reasonably.
I’ve heard rumours that the F-15C GE’s racks weren’t wired for firing missiles but I lack the knowledge and sources to prove that.
Either way, war thunder is a game, not a simulator.
I believe some aspects of realism can be ignored as long as it’s done in a reasonable manner and still make x thing fun to play or counter able enough.
Su-27SM racks as well as F-15 racks are reasonable to me.
LDIRCM though absolutely isn’t
F-5C flares too as another example.
4 Likes
It could theoretically since they have the same seeker as the R-27R, but I don’t think the 27E series was integrated onto the 9.12s.
afaik the first Fulcrums to get 27E’s were the MiG-29S’s. (like the MiG-29N we have in game)
Ah I see, I didn’t know that the MiG 29 was not capable of firing R27 ERs
1 Like
I wouldn’t mind missing out on 2 missiles on the RU Flankers, they already have enough as is, plus it would make Su-35S more special when it comes out.
It’s a common misconception, I only learned about it a few days ago.
But if you think about it, it makes sense since the R-27E series began testing ~1986 whereas the Fulcrum was put in service in 1983.
1 Like
I just checked, according to Mikoyan, the MiG-29 cannot carry R-27E series, But the MiG-29S can.
SO CAN YOU PLEASE anwser my question what about
this no other country has a counterpart which is hard to counter with sams and travels so fast and is accurate…
AND
why arent you responding to that? hmm ? why is it that russian tech tree has also those things which are a huge advantage to it while you cant implement a damn flightpath like it should for jagms and hellfires???
War Thunder is a simulator. All simulators are games.
And missile availability isn’t a realism standpoint, but an authenticity standpoint.
But yeah, double racks make sense since the manufacturer made them for advanced Flankers, and they’re seen on Flankers that were initially produced in 2012.
Without evidence of avionics lock-out/degradation, compatibility is reasonably assumed in the era of solid state computing.
Man I just played quite a few matches at 10.7 tonight, the entire time it was filled with Russian CAS, Spruts and T series tanks that would roll every match, I think in the amount of games I played I can only pick out 3 matches where my team won, and those matches had Russia on my side. Give or take it’s not every match no, but you cannot ignore the fact that Russia has a 60% win rate at every BR above 9.7, literally every nation with the except of Italy and Israel (above 11.0) has a win rate below 50%. Win rates are the smoking gun man. Now I’m an average player, not good, not bad, I don’t have a 1.0 KD, but I at least contribute to my team trying to win.
Top tier has a clear Russian bias at least for ground battles, air is a mixed bag.
Still waiting for AGM 114L for use in the AH64D w/ it’s radar. We have seen that the new pantsir can lock multiple targets, time to upgrade the Apache Longbow :P
2 Likes
still waiting for you to respond to
oh wait you come here claiming that we suck and the game has no bias but i gave you 2 more points you avoind to anwser which makes
yeah so why i have to sweat in us / german / italian CAS while russians have the magic mach 2 missile?
do you reallly miss the point that russian bias what we mean is not a single vehicle (excluding the bmpt and pantsir) but the damn entire lineup you can have to pump out damage compare it to others…
the 2 points the flighpath of hellfires/jagms and the damn kh-38 mt you mix those two add a spam of tanks and you have games where no matter what russians dominate and the win rates say it all but you avoid those points because you know you can’t say anything about that… you play the “try being in the middile but it is how it is” game where you defend russians while saying oh yes only the bmpt and pantsir is op but you fail to notice other stats of other vehicles which when mixed take the fun out of the game… even the amount of players playing russia says it all…
so can the old one
its been able to since it was added