oh and i forgot about your great posts about Yak 9 with 45mm APHE being equivalent to HS 129 or Grizzly, coz they are all the same planes :D
@Hans_von_Grobel
Dude…
People are not malicious because we call out BMPT being OP and Kh-38MT being OP when both were blatantly OP.
People are not malicious for complaining about BR compression.
These aren’t pretend arguments, these are valid criticisms we have as thousands of people.
I’ve only ever said Kh-38MT is more powerful than AGM-65D in a direct comparison:
March 2025, and was implied in the post in October 2024.
However, implications aren’t as good as explicitly saying things so I made it explicit in the March 2025 edit.
I’ve said both are more OP against ground units, forcing players to spawn CAP to deal with Kh-38MT and AGM-65D slingers consistently.
Pantsir only got its 16km effective range in October 2024 after a guidance buff to its missiles that major update.
The fact that no one had a CLAWS equivalent SPAA to deal with F-15E and Su-34 was atrocious.
I also never gave an opinion on the Yak’s 45mm APHE round anywhere online; So I’ll give one here: 45mm APHE fired from an aircraft is at least a top 10 anti-tank round in the sub-8.0 BR aircraft.
Is it the best? Probably not, but it is at least potent when in the right hands.
1 Like
Is this about the whole “secondary spalling = false” line of code situation that got quickly debunked?
Look who’s talking, the crybaby, just another one on this forum, like you there are plenty here, “admits that the missile has properties that make it stronger,” this is the most nonsensical thing I’ve ever read, after all, for your empty head it must be difficult to understand that all missiles in the game act differently and the only thing that almost all of them have in common is the seeker, you only have a skill problem.
1 Like
3 Likes
Kind of just nullified all of your arguments by taking answers from reddit.
4 Likes
@Heavytanker1945 @CAS_is_Bаlаnced
Definitely the same. Keep in mind T-72A has the best gun depression of them all, so you’ll only get worse results with the others. Vehicles like former are much easier to play and find spots with on maps that aren’t Cargo Port or Sweden.
4 Likes
I know this is a factual statement, but it is still hilarious to read 😂 RU…“best” gun depression 🤣 I lol’d.
1 Like
4 Likes
Jeez I was expecting some toxic comments but the sheer amount of delusions and toxicness caused me to cough irl.
2 Likes
Well they are just such different tanks that putting them in a 1v1 in a corridor they both pushed into (a situation the leclerc shouldnt get itself into in the first place) and which is as favorable as a situation for the t90m as possible obviously favors the much better tank. So thats a stupid matchup to begin with.
but to say that the t90m is worse than the leclerc in everything but armor is also not quite correct and i think you know that. The t90m has a better dart (penetrator weighs 5 kg compared to the leclercs 4 kg dart with similar pen, but that still results in much better post pen damage), it has gen two commander thermals (that only the leclerc SXXI gets) it has LWS, spall liners, an he round, ess and ir air target tracking plus a top mounted 12.7. The Leclercs get none of that (well some do get one of those but none of the others) while still having worse gun depression than almost every other nato top tier mbt. In fact the difference of the leclercs gun depression to other nato tanks is the same like from Leclerc to t90m (2°)
The t90m is far from bad, by stats alone it somehow is my best performing russian top tier tank, it just needs to be played way more cautious than the t80s since you cant retreat, once youre in a bad position too far forward youre in big trouble.
Its just that those two with their differences of armor (much better on T90) and mobility (much better on Leclerc) results in such different playstyles that comparing them in: they both meet head on in an alley is just a stupid way of comparing them.
But yeah the leclerc definitely needs fixes and adjustments. One of the worst top tier darts on a quite sluggish platform (not in max speed but turning and maneuvering on hills is absolute dogwater on the leclerc somehow) with basically no armor (at least way less than most other top tier mbts, except the type 10) on the turret and the hull forces you to play in a weird way of brawling and holding certain positions and then see our abysmal dart fail to do damage in one of 5 shots and die because of that bs. EDIT: just remembered, the only 2 smoke pops and having no top mounted 50 cal on the leclercs is also annoying af.
People often trash talks about T-90M due to its reverse speed while completely ignoring its positive sides.
Honestly it gets boring at this point, its a great tank with many strengths and its my favorite Russian Tank at top tier.
2 Likes
Yeah, i think its just too different in playstyle from the hold w tanks that russia usually sports in top tier and people dont want or cant adapt to playing more cautious. But having some t90ms sprinkled in between your team that is early rushing that are actually holding positions, sightlines and defend the map control you usually gain early by t80bvms and not just speeding down the map on the most direct route to the enemies spawn can turn a russian team from absolutely folding in front of said spawn into a completely different beast.
1 Like
Exactly, I love holding positions with my T-90M especially on long range maps while my T-80’s and light vehicles pushes forward.
I can basically tank incoming shells with my great armor while providing my teammates solid firepower from distance and keep the enemy distracted with my existence.
1 Like
What is early map control worth if you cant solidify it and cant hold the caps because everyone just yolos around trying to get into cas as quick as possible? Its worth nothing if 80% of those people just suicide in stupid and unnecessary pushes
1 Like
not rly, because i wasn’t referring to any answers just pointing out that this guy is literally gaijin troll patrolling forum…and he is well known for that all over internet…
well cannot be debunked when its still present in game right… not to mention that i was talking about general post pen spalling multiplier which was reduced fot T-tanks and slightly up for NATO tanks to “balance” tank layouts (gaijin words)
by the way driver - engine front pens on T- tanks is very loved feature to this date.
A russaboo coping again. :) try harder Z boy
it should be tiny fragments not steering missiles in… it’s like when they still take MBT rounds and don’t obliterate.
Happens so rarely for me that I usually forget about this feature. Maybe 1 in 10-20 shots?
https://www.reddit.com/r/Warthunder/comments/yu8rsr/russian_side_armor_is_specifically_set_not_to/
If you want to say that this is also in game for NATO, sure it’s not debunked. However this seems pretty much debunked.
Unless you want to go full conspiracy wappie mode.
1 Like