No missile ignores multipathing.
And when notching, no missile ignores chaff. Once chaff disappears the missile can re-acquire a non-maneuvering target, but that’s about it.
All* helicopters.
The way they fixed it was updating the general helicopter flight model, which fixed all helicopters, and obviously impacted Kamovs a bit more.
If Russian bias exists, then by the same standards US bias and German bias exist too. These nations are treated much better by Gaijin, consistently have the most powerful and undertiered vehicles, and have bug reports addressed and actioned upon faster and more often.
It’s a self-reinforcing loop, originating from the extreme gap between the popularity of Big 3 nations and every other tech tree. The player population of the latter category spend more, perform worse in battles (leading to favourable balance adjustments), and have a much bigger control over community sentiment/pressure.
When you look at top tier, these nations almost always have the best vehicles. This is extremely obvious in the technology advancement update cycle: major nations get the newest and most advanced vehicles, whereas the equivalent vehicles of minor nations come months or years later. The opposite situation rarely occurs, and is the exception rather than the rule.
oooh it does. namely R77-1 not completely but is much much less susceptible to it. It have no problem tracking and hitting even nothing plane at 10m RA while AIM 120 loose track on planes flying straight at altitude.
You know we have data sheets with seeker stats straight from the files right?
(credit to the authors of the sheet of course)
The AIM-120 and R-77-1 have identical seekers in game. The only ARHs with better seekers are the AIM-54s, Fakours and MICA-EM iirc.
you know that this means absolutely nothing right? BMPT have FCS and electronics modules modeled but they were disabled in code for that specific vehicle, just likey every ATGM vehicle have handpicked missile launcher damage model, despite general rule… but yea keep coping
If you have any actual evidence that the R-77-1 has a better seeker feel free to share it.
However “just trust me bro” or “it came to me in a dream” level statements like yours aren’t very trustworthy.
you can search for multiple vidoes of people complaining and showing in sensor view how R77 tracks planes at 5 meters above ground without any problem while AIM 120 missing plane going HEAD on at 1km alt. And if i have to choose if i ahve to believe those vidoes and my VAST experience in sim vs gaijin word i will pick the 1st. We all know how gaijin copy paste vehicles but the one vehicle they “forget” to model something here and there. Just like BMPT somehow missing damageable modules, T tanks having reduced spalling and so on… Not my problem you guys need to lie to yourself in order to pretend this game doesn’t have selective modeling for certain vehicles or nation…
I can also cherry pick videos that show the opposite happening.
You forget a very important thing. Nobody mentioned Gaijin’s word. The data sheet I linked has stats datamined directly from the game files/code, which was datamined/put together by a group of very credible people (including Gszabi). None of these people work for Gaijin.
So yeah I believe a document made by credible dataminers over a random guy on the forum.
Talk about coping lol.
lmao lol
Quite a skill problem, isn’t it? Looks like you’re are multipath user, rsrsrssr. The only thing happening is that the R77’s loft is much higher than the AIM-120’s, meaning it will hit you from above, and this mechanic, which should be nerfed, won’t save you from an R77 coming from above your head.
Dude, I’ve tracked rear-aspect low altitude targets with AIM-120 and MICA-EM alike.
Knowing HOW to launch weapons in non-ideal situations is a skill.
T-series tanks have never had reduced spalling. HHA has reduced spalling, but that’s not a tank, that’s an armor type.
Enjoy lying to yourself I guess.
when in 1 of 10 examples AIM 120 hits plane near ground while 9 of 10 R77-1 do opposite it just proves my point anyway…
All you said that it have same seeker, which means it is tracking or should track the same, which it doesn’t, because R771 just tracks near ground better. If its by hidden code or by other missile trait which is handpicked by gaijin i dont know. Fact is R77-1 reliably tracks planes at ground level or even on RWY when taking of and even when platform which fires is is ground hugging to… AIM 120 wont hit anything below 50 or so meters no matter what.
That’s just verified information from sources you praised above…And ehm autoloader…
coming from rusaboo troll who just in second sentence admit that R77-1 having different properties making them stronger… gj
“low” altitude is broad definition. ground level? pure nonsense for Aim 120. Getting lecture from one of trio forum trolls pretending everything is ok with russia while making claims like PUMA is better than BMPT and other quite funny statements is very laughable at best :) You, Renzo and Morvan are quite notorious for your forum patrolling and rushing to defense on definitely not Russian bias. By the way your claim that AGM 65 is better than KH 38mt or is its equivalent is also quite funny.
@Hans_von_Grobel
Ah yes, accusing everyone you come across of being malicious.
Keep defending [shilling for?] your precious Russian vehicles.
“Kh-38MT is superior to AGM-65D.” - Me, countless times.
“BMPT is superior to Puma.” - Me.
So you either miswrote, or are attempting to provoke others.
Oh, and low altitude means multipathing in the context of my post.
just 3 of you :) there are even post on redits about you sitting on forum almost nonstop spreading nonsense.
KH 38 is same as AGM 65 and Pantsir is not strong SPAA, no need to do anything about KH 38, its now 50/50. Your words. I wont be spamming this thread with all your nonsense on this nor i will spend hours searching for every of your fantasy claim in different threads.
@Hans_von_Grobel
You can think Kh-38 and AGM-65 are the same if you want, but I won’t think that.
I was calling for CLAWS equivalent SPAA since 2022. Pantsir, an inferior SPAA, was added in 2023.
CLAWS finally got added in 2025.
I’ve been calling top CAS OP since 2021.
Kh-38MT is superior to AGM-65D no matter what you claim.
Pantsir was never enough to deal with top CAS added in 2022 and 2023. CLAWS and equals were necessary.
Pantsir, CS, etc were good counters to CAS added in 2022, but with LGBUs gaining CCIP, and Pantsir being knee-capped to 13km against jets for the first 17 months of its life, LGBUs were still okay against tanks.
tbh the WT reddit it just a echo chamber that is just sitting there gaslighting it self over and over with nonsense
this forum isn’t any better, its highly moderated and most likely paid trolls like Alvis are pretending to argue about everything. To flood the forum with nonsense.
What ever floats your boat. All your replies and claims are free to check. I wont waste my time doing that. You are almost nonstop posting about everything everywhere and i wont be wasting my time with you, you are not arguing you are just flooding forum with nonsense to please gaijin. Again you are well known all over the internet, better to change your name again RazerVon
you clearly said otherwise in KH 38 thread. btw Pantsir isn’t alone on map right… love how you are on purpose missing the whole context of russian vehicles supporting each other in one huge combined arms complex with several game breaking examples.