Intersting game.I guess they enemy to complain Russia tanks weak
1 Like
Is there even another option? Doesnt change that the situation is not balanced tho.
Never said that he isnt but in this case Migoon really had nothing to base his argument on while Riper at least had some credibility
1 Like
I sleep bad regardless, Quetiapine is carrying me hard in that regard. So sorry, but you can’t take credit for that.
Not really, I open the forums, look around threads and laugh about skill issue takes like you usually post. After I get bored from that I close the forum again and go on with my life.
Oh I don’t disagree with you on this. I mainly wanted to point out that it would be hypocritical from the guy to dismiss Migoons opinion because “you barely play X”, but at the same time not using the same logic to dismiss SadRIPers opinion.
what do you mean??? 0/10 ragebait
No it doesn’t.
THANK YOU! thats what ive been telling these bots (funny how nobody responded to you).
Well, ive been agreeing with you with the russian mbts, the other guys (not you) just seem not to even acknowledge my arguments, only you do.
1 Like
lol.
Add-on armor deflects incoming shells, both STRV-122/2A7V ufp cannot be penetrated unless you have height advantage.
And how do you plan on hiding something that is obnoxiously exposed? By turning your back to enemy?
4 Likes
That’s just standard baiting.
Which I’ve never done.
I only speak on matters I’ve studied, and do a tactful job avoiding commenting on issues I have not studied.
That is despite posters on other topics attempting to force me to have a take on an issue I haven’t studied, and lie about my takes.
Elit, I am not here to upset you. And if you got upset, I apologize.
If you had difficulties understanding my statements, I need to know so I can improve my wording.
1 Like
Maybe you should study the alphabet lmao.
@REO_Speedwagon
So you provide an example of me asking for evidence; AKA not speaking on subjects I have not studied.
And asking you to make a historical report on the bug report website if you have said evidence.
Is this your first time reading english?
I try to take people serious until they prove me otherwise. But yes, I think he might be under some sort of influence and blind rage for Russia. Best advice for him is play Russia and stop drinking while on forums.
Russian bias disappears real quick when people see what Russia is really like in game first hand.
3 Likes
Russia vs Russia… what are we looking at?
He is completely biased against russia and if you look throughout my interactions with him he also says china are biased and stronger than NATO which just isn’t true lol.
Believe me I know, russia took me the longest to get from rank 5 to 8, hell rank 8 released before I got them to top tier XD
I dispise their MBTs and I’m not a huge fan of lights and such
1 Like
Yes, he’s definitely biased from what I’ve read. But seeing he doesn’t even take the gameplay serious already tells me his opinion is useless. He can’t expect a team to carry him every game if he’s not “sweating” and playing without a care in the world. He probably sees anything red, J’s out, takes a drink and hits forums.
3 Likes
Top tier is currently broke with the BMPT META tank. I don’t believe Russian Bias exists but in terms of BMPT “Russian Bias” season is still here.
I am also in BMPT forum complaining and giving sheer gameplay data where I went top 3, 10 games in a row with a 10 win streak.
3 Likes
this forum tho is not really talking about russian mbts being op tho
1 Like
As far as Russian MBTs go, apart from BMPT and SM-SV (SPAA). Russian bias doesn’t exist, the Russian MBTs are by far the worst in my opinion. I’m on this forum stating Russian Bias doesn’t exist.
EDIT: Like all forums, people will always get off topic every now and then. Some people only read the title and comment. It is what it is haha
4 Likes
I believe the “bias” for the MBTs boils down to how Gaijin implemented ERA and how the autoloader tends to eat more spall than the turret baskets on Western MBTs do.
2 Likes