You do realise ik people who do play props?
I don’t have to play them?
1 Like
MBTs are better than most if not all light tanks due to their armor, so mobility is not the end-all-be-all of top tier. What matters is a combination of mobility, firepower, and armor, which can be summed up as TTK. It doesn’t matter much if you can pen 600mm of armor and the other guy can only pen 500mm if armor if you only have 450mm of armor and need to take longer to aim for a weakspot. As such, there is an armor meta if you factor in the difference in TTK between merely being able to aim center mass and completely disabling a tank vs. actually having to aim.
As opposed to Russia which has the most armored mobile tank? You seem to be conceding that armor matters a lot.
Russian bias
Spoiler
No I mean it, russian bias
Only barrel and tracks for both btw
1 Like
When you contradict your statements in your own post.
Raging-baiting is the process of raging at someone in order to upset them.
Something I have never done in my life, because it would require me to be inauthentic for one, and it would require me to want others to be upset which will never happen. Standard baiting is the intent to get someone upset with inauthentic statements [not raging].
To be contrarian I’d have to be claiming nation bias exists, a deeply minority view.
Accusing someone of raging at people to bait them into being upset is a serious false accusation; you are intentionally attributing malice to people that criticize Russian equipment.
1- I’ve defended the BMPT by demanding BMPT be moved up to 11.3/11.7, and later 12.0 alongside other powerful 11.7s that have no business fighting 10.7 Abrams and Leopard 2A4s.
2- I’ve exclusively demanded for decompression.
3- I’ve been criticizing Russian equipment for years, as all my posts prove.
4- I’ve agreed with most people on the forum on a manner of subjects.
5- I’ve done better and better to understand others.
6- I’ve never in my life thought anyone was being malicious in a discussion.
But yeah, keep claiming people that criticize Russian equipment, demand decompression, demand balance, et cetera are malicious.
All your posts have done is prove all of us right.
You disagree with everyone, for what reason? Is it because you misunderstood posts?
Could I and others have done a better job writing the posts to make understanding easier?
Cause I guarantee you and everyone on this topic: The only take I’ve stated that a large amount of people disagree with: “Nation bias does not exist.”
If nation bias existed:
MD326K wouldn’t be the BMPT of air RB.
P51H5NA wouldn’t be a different BR to Spitfire F Mk24.
M1A1 HC wouldn’t be a lower BR than USSR’s best MBTs.
BMPT wouldn’t be in a long history of incorrectly BR’d new tanks: With notable previous additions being Puma, and EBR; and EBR was even more oppressive.
That is the evidence that nation bias cannot exist. And even though that take of mine sees the most backlash, it’s still a minority of people because most people know nation bias doesn’t exist.
Hanlon’s Razor is easily applied to all bad balancing decisions.
There are other minor takes that a few people have disagreed with, but no where close to a notable amount.
1 Like
Watch this, that stuff is not exclusive to Russia.
Enjoy the last clip
Everybody know bro… He only here to make the point that he is making killings with NATO tanks while mostly everybody here have the problem with the game balance.
1 Like
Hate to breaking it with you, but MANY other people have a problem dealing with it that there is a massive thread about it.
Still the helis are OP
1 Like
lol what about the hull or gun mandlet or very exposed turret ring???
For that LAST time, I am NOT relying on the armor-- I am saying ITS NOT MODELED IN PROPERLY. (respectfully).
2 Likes
leopard 2A7 also has weaker hull, abrams can ufp it in prot analysis.
Don’t expose it? Why are we relying on armour as primary defense
1 Like
funny how you say im contradicting myself when you or someone else redacted what you are quoting… I clearly said “I HAVE accused you of ragebaiting” not raging… wtf are yo trying to do here?
Again you are intentionally misunderstanding me. and pretending that raging and rage baiting are the same thing.
Rage baiting someone doesnt have to involve you yourself being full of rage…
Ragebait is simply "trying to provoke anger or outrage out of someone by literally baiting replies from them either by making calculated, pompous falsehoods or intentionally absurd statements that make no sense to deliberately derail conversation.
But now we are arguing definitions of words (as you intended) instead of the actual issue at hand because you cannot seem to stop intentionally misunderstanding things and forcing people to have to explain basic vocabulary and definitions to you. Your intention is to derail good faith debate and ragebait as per the definition of “ragebait”.
1 Like
This happens a lot with most tanks. Are you just now grinding russia? You’ll begin to soon see Russian bias doesn’t exist. In fact, the only real “bias” is when you unlock BMPT or SMSV. That’s if you get to it before Gajin fixes their mistake.
5 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
I don’t even play with headphones. Meaning no directional sounds.
I don’t put strong/META vehicles in my lineups if they’re ugly (aka Leos in top tier grb France for example).
I only play for the lore. I’m not a 10k hours sweat like you. I don’t care about kd lmao.
It doesn’t disqualify me from saying Russia wins large majority of top tier grb games, and that I’m sick of it. It also doesn’t disqualify me from saying there are obvious artificial / shadow buffs in the russian tech tree, made to make Russia stronger than it should be, on purpose.
I’m in your head, I obsess you, you cannot sleep at night anymore.
Tbf in this case Migoon was arguing for something he neither plays nor has any statistical backing, the P51 is really unremarkable statistically.
russia being way too strong in top tier does actually have good statistical evidence and the copious amounts of selective realism leading to that are also amply documented so theres much less of a need to actively play russia to form an opinion.
4 Likes
You should always give it 100%, your team needs you to. Most times I’ve seen a match win or lose is someone stuck around past their 2nd tank no kills and played SPAA correctly covering their team.
If you’re not sweating or care to try then there’s no point in listening to you on forums.
2 Likes
Oh my feeling about the top tir is I would rather do the Chinese high school math problems than play other 9 country(except Russia 9 team)
1 Like
This as we discussed in the past is no longer an argument.
One might argue that it’s mix of new (verry strong) vehicles and “flavor of the month” mentality.
Regardless @_Renzo is right.
I mean there’s a fne line between sweating your trim in to win and actively participating in the match. the sheer volume of people right now who will literally leave a game without spawning if it’s VS russia is quite stupid.
over the course of last week / the weekend I have been playing 11.7 italy- 12.7 china and 12.7 Germany just to finish some grinding.
On average 4 people will leave the game before they spawn, meaning you’re actively at a huge disadvantage before the match even begins.
Which will also further inflate russian winrates as well as the feeling that russian teams are overhwelmingly strong. the biggest issue VS Russia tends to be weathering that initial storm, which is a pain but isn’t impossible.
I tend to find when they have no BMPTs in their team tehy get steamrolled quite easily.
Their cas isn’t that hard to shoot down.
3 Likes
Very hard. this depends on the cas player skill.And not depending on your autonomous navigation missiles
You must be prepared your enemy very strong