Meanwhile youve also never even touched the Zeroes… Hmmm interesting.
So what experience and expertise do you have to make this claim then?
So what experience and expertise do you have to make this claim then?
Lmao you think p51 is undertiered? which one the D-30?? it really doesnt matter bc tbh if you are losing to P-51s, and i mean any variant… thats totally a skill issue man. Any time i see a p51 i know its a free kill, they are literally a joke. Gimped flight modelles that arent using their proper fuel octane and are shadow nerfed by the amount of minumum fuel they have to carry. the only decent p51 is the french C varient as it has way less minimum fuel. The p51s are trash
as for the Zeroes. have you played them at all recently? they are great planes… what are you trying to do with them? chase people all game that are faster than you?? maybe play the damn thing how tis supposed to be and youll do better??
Meanwhile you play the p51 how its supposed to: climb high and stay fast despite its abyssmal climb rate and weight. and it still gets outperformed
An equal to the P-51H is going to go 7.0, while the P-51H remains at 6.3.
Objectively false.
They’re only good because they face people who refuse to fly by abusing their weaknesses.
This isn’t true for the H.
2 Likes
So you agree they are good. 👍
Wow one decent plane out of like 12 p51s in the game.
Also what equal are you speaking of? The spitfire griffons? I hope that’s not what you mean because that’s gonna make me horse laugh. 😂
Source: Trust me bro.
They are not good planes, it’s just that the opponents are even worse. They aren’t even that fun since all fun is lost the moment you meet someone who has some clue what they are doing.
Yes. I’ve played the Mk24 and P-51H, and I don’t think one is meaningfully better than the other. It’s also just better than the Mk22.
You do realise ik people who do play props?
I don’t have to play them?
1 Like
MBTs are better than most if not all light tanks due to their armor, so mobility is not the end-all-be-all of top tier. What matters is a combination of mobility, firepower, and armor, which can be summed up as TTK. It doesn’t matter much if you can pen 600mm of armor and the other guy can only pen 500mm if armor if you only have 450mm of armor and need to take longer to aim for a weakspot. As such, there is an armor meta if you factor in the difference in TTK between merely being able to aim center mass and completely disabling a tank vs. actually having to aim.
As opposed to Russia which has the most armored mobile tank? You seem to be conceding that armor matters a lot.
Russian bias
Spoiler
No I mean it, russian bias
Only barrel and tracks for both btw
1 Like
When you contradict your statements in your own post.
Raging-baiting is the process of raging at someone in order to upset them.
Something I have never done in my life, because it would require me to be inauthentic for one, and it would require me to want others to be upset which will never happen. Standard baiting is the intent to get someone upset with inauthentic statements [not raging].
To be contrarian I’d have to be claiming nation bias exists, a deeply minority view.
Accusing someone of raging at people to bait them into being upset is a serious false accusation; you are intentionally attributing malice to people that criticize Russian equipment.
1- I’ve defended the BMPT by demanding BMPT be moved up to 11.3/11.7, and later 12.0 alongside other powerful 11.7s that have no business fighting 10.7 Abrams and Leopard 2A4s.
2- I’ve exclusively demanded for decompression.
3- I’ve been criticizing Russian equipment for years, as all my posts prove.
4- I’ve agreed with most people on the forum on a manner of subjects.
5- I’ve done better and better to understand others.
6- I’ve never in my life thought anyone was being malicious in a discussion.
But yeah, keep claiming people that criticize Russian equipment, demand decompression, demand balance, et cetera are malicious.
All your posts have done is prove all of us right.
You disagree with everyone, for what reason? Is it because you misunderstood posts?
Could I and others have done a better job writing the posts to make understanding easier?
Cause I guarantee you and everyone on this topic: The only take I’ve stated that a large amount of people disagree with: “Nation bias does not exist.”
If nation bias existed:
MD326K wouldn’t be the BMPT of air RB.
P51H5NA wouldn’t be a different BR to Spitfire F Mk24.
M1A1 HC wouldn’t be a lower BR than USSR’s best MBTs.
BMPT wouldn’t be in a long history of incorrectly BR’d new tanks: With notable previous additions being Puma, and EBR; and EBR was even more oppressive.
That is the evidence that nation bias cannot exist. And even though that take of mine sees the most backlash, it’s still a minority of people because most people know nation bias doesn’t exist.
Hanlon’s Razor is easily applied to all bad balancing decisions.
There are other minor takes that a few people have disagreed with, but no where close to a notable amount.
1 Like
Watch this, that stuff is not exclusive to Russia.
Enjoy the last clip
Everybody know bro… He only here to make the point that he is making killings with NATO tanks while mostly everybody here have the problem with the game balance.
1 Like
Hate to breaking it with you, but MANY other people have a problem dealing with it that there is a massive thread about it.
Still the helis are OP
1 Like
lol what about the hull or gun mandlet or very exposed turret ring???
For that LAST time, I am NOT relying on the armor-- I am saying ITS NOT MODELED IN PROPERLY. (respectfully).
2 Likes
leopard 2A7 also has weaker hull, abrams can ufp it in prot analysis.
Don’t expose it? Why are we relying on armour as primary defense
1 Like
funny how you say im contradicting myself when you or someone else redacted what you are quoting… I clearly said “I HAVE accused you of ragebaiting” not raging… wtf are yo trying to do here?
Again you are intentionally misunderstanding me. and pretending that raging and rage baiting are the same thing.
Rage baiting someone doesnt have to involve you yourself being full of rage…
Ragebait is simply "trying to provoke anger or outrage out of someone by literally baiting replies from them either by making calculated, pompous falsehoods or intentionally absurd statements that make no sense to deliberately derail conversation.
But now we are arguing definitions of words (as you intended) instead of the actual issue at hand because you cannot seem to stop intentionally misunderstanding things and forcing people to have to explain basic vocabulary and definitions to you. Your intention is to derail good faith debate and ragebait as per the definition of “ragebait”.
1 Like
This happens a lot with most tanks. Are you just now grinding russia? You’ll begin to soon see Russian bias doesn’t exist. In fact, the only real “bias” is when you unlock BMPT or SMSV. That’s if you get to it before Gajin fixes their mistake.
5 Likes
I don’t even play with headphones. Meaning no directional sounds.
I don’t put strong/META vehicles in my lineups if they’re ugly (aka Leos in top tier grb France for example).
I only play for the lore. I’m not a 10k hours sweat like you. I don’t care about kd lmao.
It doesn’t disqualify me from saying Russia wins large majority of top tier grb games, and that I’m sick of it. It also doesn’t disqualify me from saying there are obvious artificial / shadow buffs in the russian tech tree, made to make Russia stronger than it should be, on purpose.
I’m in your head, I obsess you, you cannot sleep at night anymore.