Criminally undertiered?
No. It’s the best at what it does at its BR, by a slight margin (and basically everywhere else in Air RB, mind you, America is not the top dog- there are plenty of areas where the spitfires and yaks bully). But with the P-51H basically every nation has some kind of counter to it.
This logic is flawed…t90m is a wayy better tank than a M1A1 HC…except the whole reverse thing as is tradition with russian tanks…except what yall say about the fire power of the abrams is the only thing i partly agree with even if i suck at tanks ik a t90m is a waaaay better tank than a Abrams no matter the tier…at least in warthunder…a BMPT can cripple any tank frontally…the bmpt is a 12.7 tank…simple…
T-90M is only better in 1 regard: Armor.
However, War Thunder has never had an armor meta among MBTs due to over-performing mobility as a universal trait.
MBT’s are so much faster than their real-life counterparts [except Type 10 and Leclerc, whom are closer to their real life mobility than everyone else] that the mobility meta remains.
When Abrams players remember this, they decimate matches having the most mobile armored tank in the game firing the best MBT round out of the 2nd best gun.
And no, BMPT cannot cripple “any” tank, it can some tanks, but not any.
Challenger 2 for example cannot die frontally to a BMPT at close and long ranges, and at medium ranges the mobility of Challenger 2 is still enough to dodge ATGMs hitting its breech.
Sorry, I don’t care how much you defend Russia, BMPT will never be as good as 12.7 MBTs.
Absolute Russian propaganda to claim that a BMPT can ever be as good as 12.7 MBT [except maybe Leclerc].
shoots the main gun and disables it…i did not mean kill…but it can kill tanks frontally with the missiles…
average mobility…not the best…
BMPT is 12.7 material…
The tunel vision is real
Ah yes, skilled players play RU only … yes my dude.
That’s what people say when they cite Statshark.
People need to understand their citations before posting them.
i have no interest in proving anything to you… you are a troll, and a ragebaiter, a long time one at that.
What in the skill issue? It’s not, the T-90M is worse than the M1A1 HC.
The T-90M is the perfect skill check vehicle, seems like you are yet another person who didn’t pass that skill check.
You have that opinion exactly because you suck at tanks, the overwhelming majority of the good players have the exact opposite opinion.
Again
They do, you’re the only person who actively thinks that winrates are entirely an expression of player skill and vehicles have no impact on it.
I don’t think that, never have.
Knowing something is not thinking something.
It is not and has never been my take, it’s an academic reality until a statistician proves the previous statistician proofs incorrect.
@ElectedElit21372
All you do is falsely accuse [rage] everyone of being bad after they criticize Russian equipment.
Meanwhile I’ve never raged at you, which you falsely accused me of doing.
It is when the thing you think you know is blatantly wrong.
its not academic reality its video game 101. Youre the guy who likes philosophical principles so maybe apply occams razor here. Whats more likely?
That theres a cabale of players big and good enough to make winrate swings happen against the thousands of players that according to you keep their winrates and all of that coincidentally in the same timframes of updates with new, more powerful additions.
Or
Those new additions are more powerful and therefore increase the winrate of a tech tree.
Depends on what you’re looking when you choose a tank.
On long range maps T-90M is far superior to HC while in CQC engagements HC is objectively better.
Both provides different advantages depending on your choices.
That is fair, although I would argue that the M1A1 HC is a better all rounder. The T-90M is good in it’s strong area/comfort role, but it’s far less adaptable than the M1A1 HC.
True.
T-90M depends on certain conditions and spesific game play style while HC offers more flexible gameplay.
One thing for sure 90M is tough nut to crack in hulldown position on long range maps tho.
It’s still way undertiered.
Hey, we might also put in all 12.0 Abrams which are undertiered, T58 as well as XM246.
You can’t tell me one of the best 35mm API-T monsters isn’t ruining the br.
35mm API-T is ruining the br, no Russian vehicle has it or an equivalent and is benefiting from questionable mechanics.
Id still pick hc tbh. It isnt so picky when it comes to choosing position thanks to -10 deg gun depression and 38 km/h reverse. Also it gets one of strongest top tier shells and 5s reload. Wouldnt trade those for lws, better tvd and better armor (at that ranges hc armor should be good enough too)
Sure i guess you can make the argument that those are all undertiered especially the T58. Still dont know what the P51 had to do with all of that and still dont know how thats comparable to a 1.8 million games, 1.5 KD, 60% winrate bias machine thats only as good as it is due to a blatant disregard for realism.
dare you to find something russian that was made with only “video proof” lol. They negated the reload buff for T serie tanks for maybe 3 years with the video proofs up until they themselves decided to do research (which was already done by players) and make the reload buff. lol :/