@H_ngma
You are being a tad hostile from my perspective, Ngma.
I never responded to any post talking about BMPT’s ammo implementation, nor have I made any post making claims about belted ammo stability in my entire life.
Also, the business days from January 8th to the 13th was 4: 9th, 11th, 12th, 13th.
On top of that, Puma wasn’t moved to its 10.0 BR that quickly either [and time doesn’t matter anyway].
It was initially moved to 8.7/9.0, then later moved in a higher engagement, but when we speak about how quickly EBR/Puma/BMPT move up we’re talking about the big moves.
Cause who cares that Puma was moved up to 8.7? Let alone how quick it was?
It wasn’t quick, but it doesn’t matter because speed of BR changes is not relevant to anything other than discussing how apprehensive Gaijin can be about moving vehicle BRs up out of weird fears.
P51H5NA has yet to be moved to the same BR as Spitfire Mk24, and it’s been over 5 years.
Is that American bias? Or is it just ignorance on the vehicle’s capability?
@Fat_Fury
Fury… we should have calm nerves when discussing things.
You should not be upset.
As for the “videos” showcasing things, all those things have been occurring against most tanks in War Thunder; from bad shots, to negative consequences of simplified armor modeling, to server related issues impacting survivability.
So Mr Fury, please meditate, have a nice drink, and I’ll keep doing my best to show respect to you so you feel heard.
Cause I do read your posts, I take in your perspectives, I enjoy reading and I especially enjoy reading perspectives that differ from my own so I can build a larger picture of things.
@DankanXP311
The premium BMPT is far, far less survivable than the tech tree one.
The tech tree one can survive shots the premium one can’t due to flaws in how ERA casings are modeled, as well as flaws in how tanks move server side.
And casings are a universal issue, as ARAT 2 ERA casings are flawed and cause issues if you hit weird spots.

