You’re mixing different things together here. When russian tanks tanking shots its not necessarily a volumetric problem, it’s a mix of the dart destabilization value from the era combined with the behavior of the autoloader carousel regarding spall.
11.3 has 59% winrate while all other ountries that have data is sub 50% just shows powerless of bmpt xd
Still easy to kill as most top rounds will go through them clean at most angles, furthermore those “russian features” buy NATO’s even more time to shoot at them. Have you sit and think for a second, what if their entire hit box is green, the br will do its work because they no longer perform and they will get moved. Most nato mains who says this easier to play that easier to play, doesn’t have the kd to back it up, all just empty talks like “hohoho trust me bro I know better than everybody else without first hand experience.”
1 Like
It is certainly true that the BUK is underperforming compared to other spaa, but then adding the pansir MV seem a bit of an over-justification, every nation in game r supposed to differentiate and have their own capabilities. And currently, at top tier, Russia holds significant advantage in both cas (KH38MT and MI28NM), ground-to-ground (BMPT and BVM combo is quite annoying even if its less powerful in raw strength compared to the A7 and A7HU, but only 2 nations do have these tanks and they both suck in some other way), and now ground-to-air. Additionally, the MiG-29 flight model and su-27 did underperform for quite a bit, but the status quo is that SU-30SM2 is probably the most capable and versatile plane in game. So there’s just this issue that somehow Russia has the best vehicles in almost every role (Maybe aside from MBTs, but there they have a nice combo of mobility and armor unlike a lot of minor nations), thus this is the balancing problem.
Just saying: In a game with unequal sides having one side thats overpowering in most fields is op
1 Like
Another satisfied customer!
I mean you can cloak your shill with “N4T0 is OP/Better” and stop there
Instead, you went to call others brought made-up stories.
lol
something i just love, is that this game always has people complaining that modern vehicles face much older vehicles because the lack of capability to fight contemporaries, yet we got the bmpt’s that are perfectly capable of fighting at 12.7 being still grossly undertiered for virtually no reason. its the third br increase, and everybody knows it wont be enough.
Selling pixels for another Bentley, another lake-side summerhouse
Vehicle age is not a factor for BR placement.
Which pretty much applies to all tanks but instead of dart destabilization and ammo protecting carousels they only get a shoot here to disable module.
Pretty sure i didnt mention anything about easier to play just that no matter how strong anyone thinks they are, russian tanks profit from some very questionable modeling decisions
1 Like
no one will take you seriously after the mdos called you out… remmber that discussion popped up even few weeks ago? we see you abusivly defending russians all the time… stop man either bring something into the discussion with actual in game real proof (statistics of WR etc) ot just stop
there are hundreads over time here and other related forums but only few defending…
The BMPT will eventually die off a bit but Gajin needs to really move on it and come up with a solution. The only good Russian tank right now is that machine. Even at BR 12.7 it’s effective.
1 Like
Just lucky that it weren’t built on a t-80 hull lol
1 Like
T80BVM is a good tank so 100% agree. The 72 is bad but 5 crew on BMPT is literally the MAUS of top tier right now.
if only the ammo belt also detonate the hull ammo, but selective realism is gaijin favorite
1 Like
Is that realistic? because it only took one cook off to burn through all the ammo of Namer lol.
Yeah exactly because the Namers ammo is modeled so cooking off one round leads to a domino explosion cooking off the entire belt. The BMPTs belt is modeled as 3 distinct separated parts despite being a continous belt irl
1 Like
I thought it was two parts?
One internal part (big one bottom and ascending belt) and 2 external (left turret, right turret)
ohh I see, I thought you mean each belt by itself for each gun