I mean you can cloak your shill with “N4T0 is OP/Better” and stop there
Instead, you went to call others brought made-up stories.
lol
something i just love, is that this game always has people complaining that modern vehicles face much older vehicles because the lack of capability to fight contemporaries, yet we got the bmpt’s that are perfectly capable of fighting at 12.7 being still grossly undertiered for virtually no reason. its the third br increase, and everybody knows it wont be enough.
Selling pixels for another Bentley, another lake-side summerhouse
Vehicle age is not a factor for BR placement.
Which pretty much applies to all tanks but instead of dart destabilization and ammo protecting carousels they only get a shoot here to disable module.
Pretty sure i didnt mention anything about easier to play just that no matter how strong anyone thinks they are, russian tanks profit from some very questionable modeling decisions
1 Like
no one will take you seriously after the mdos called you out… remmber that discussion popped up even few weeks ago? we see you abusivly defending russians all the time… stop man either bring something into the discussion with actual in game real proof (statistics of WR etc) ot just stop
there are hundreads over time here and other related forums but only few defending…
The BMPT will eventually die off a bit but Gajin needs to really move on it and come up with a solution. The only good Russian tank right now is that machine. Even at BR 12.7 it’s effective.
1 Like
Just lucky that it weren’t built on a t-80 hull lol
1 Like
T80BVM is a good tank so 100% agree. The 72 is bad but 5 crew on BMPT is literally the MAUS of top tier right now.
if only the ammo belt also detonate the hull ammo, but selective realism is gaijin favorite
1 Like
Is that realistic? because it only took one cook off to burn through all the ammo of Namer lol.
Yeah exactly because the Namers ammo is modeled so cooking off one round leads to a domino explosion cooking off the entire belt. The BMPTs belt is modeled as 3 distinct separated parts despite being a continous belt irl
1 Like
I thought it was two parts?
One internal part (big one bottom and ascending belt) and 2 external (left turret, right turret)
ohh I see, I thought you mean each belt by itself for each gun
they should model it correctly by adding 2 more child labors in between to manually feeding ammos from the box to the belt for each gun.
/s
Namer
1 cookoff = stationary ornament
PUMA
3 cookoff, able to held public events like fundraisers to determine the best recipe
BMPT
∞ cookoff, it’s only fitting to use some Chuck Norris logic to explain why one ifv is a god and the other is a campfire. The bmpt doens’t cook off, its just Chuck Norris having a barbecue in the turret, and hes not done with his steak yet.
All 3 parts should be the same belt
its much better, Gaijin doesnt explain at all why the BMPT gets special treatment when it comes to ammo belt modeling. Its silence from every mod and the devs themselves.
4 Likes
like other said, bmpt should explode out of existence with how the ammo linked and how many there are.
but nooooooo, selective realism it is. it somehow get blow-out panel, the crew can even survive the cook-off in the turret. but carry too much HEAT in your western MBT ready rack? instant explosion.
Me being a “NATO shill”? You can think that.
As for your other sentence… I know first hand people that make up things to be angry about.
After all, people make up my arguments for me all the time; positions I never had.
@Fat_Fury
Me: Defends American and NATO equipment constantly
Fat Fury: “We see you defending Russia.”
There are hundreds to thousands of posts on this forum of people claiming NATO is Russia for whatever reason.
That or Fat Fury is making it all up to be angry against a fiction.