Russian Bias in 2026?

100% true, Crew always come first for NATO can’t say the same for Russia.

1 Like

That’s one of the reason why russian women run out of men to date so they go to china to marry chinese man.

China doesn’t even like Russia, they 100% don’t like Russia as neighbors and vice versa. Russia as a country doesn’t want strong neighbors, history has shown that. If it wasn’t for nuclear weapons China obtained Russia would still be bullying them with civil war till this day. My question is what Russia is going to call themselves once another collapse happens from within and if Russian tech tree would just be absorbed in Germany or Sweden.

But both share the common goal of countering US and they both need each other.

US already holds global dominance and influence. China doesn’t need Russia they’re just milking them for what they have currently. There’s numerous reports of China sending counterfeit garbage to Russia in their trade deal on purpose. China doesn’t hate the US even if you look at Xi Jinping, he spent time as a exchange student in the usa loved it and visited his hosts while being president and sent his daughter to attend Harvard. The truth is Russia is fading and truly doesn’t have allies.

Maybe we should avoid politics

1 Like

It’s not politics it’s a Russian bias post and I’m showing Russian bias doesn’t exist

I mean while i get that politics should indeed be avoided and against the rules, one can wonder if politics did not get us in that situation in the first place

Initially was talking about russian women that outnumbered their men. Foreveralone with deep pockets can now buy a waifu or married one can also keep mistresses. Sandman fault for going politic

1 Like

To be fair, most if not all of the games I played were at 12.7-13.0, I should have mentioned that. I listed all my games in an excel sheet with as much info as possible, including the replay link.

However that was my mistake. I knew SadRIPer was delusional, so by noting them down in an excel sheet I gave him a free opening to dismiss my experience and accuse me of lying.

I fully agreed on this.

2 Likes

You’re mixing different things together here. When russian tanks tanking shots its not necessarily a volumetric problem, it’s a mix of the dart destabilization value from the era combined with the behavior of the autoloader carousel regarding spall.

11.3 has 59% winrate while all other ountries that have data is sub 50% just shows powerless of bmpt xd

Still easy to kill as most top rounds will go through them clean at most angles, furthermore those “russian features” buy NATO’s even more time to shoot at them. Have you sit and think for a second, what if their entire hit box is green, the br will do its work because they no longer perform and they will get moved. Most nato mains who says this easier to play that easier to play, doesn’t have the kd to back it up, all just empty talks like “hohoho trust me bro I know better than everybody else without first hand experience.”

1 Like

It is certainly true that the BUK is underperforming compared to other spaa, but then adding the pansir MV seem a bit of an over-justification, every nation in game r supposed to differentiate and have their own capabilities. And currently, at top tier, Russia holds significant advantage in both cas (KH38MT and MI28NM), ground-to-ground (BMPT and BVM combo is quite annoying even if its less powerful in raw strength compared to the A7 and A7HU, but only 2 nations do have these tanks and they both suck in some other way), and now ground-to-air. Additionally, the MiG-29 flight model and su-27 did underperform for quite a bit, but the status quo is that SU-30SM2 is probably the most capable and versatile plane in game. So there’s just this issue that somehow Russia has the best vehicles in almost every role (Maybe aside from MBTs, but there they have a nice combo of mobility and armor unlike a lot of minor nations), thus this is the balancing problem.

Just saying: In a game with unequal sides having one side thats overpowering in most fields is op

1 Like

Another satisfied customer!

I mean you can cloak your shill with “N4T0 is OP/Better” and stop there
Instead, you went to call others brought made-up stories.
lol

something i just love, is that this game always has people complaining that modern vehicles face much older vehicles because the lack of capability to fight contemporaries, yet we got the bmpt’s that are perfectly capable of fighting at 12.7 being still grossly undertiered for virtually no reason. its the third br increase, and everybody knows it wont be enough.

Selling pixels for another Bentley, another lake-side summerhouse

Vehicle age is not a factor for BR placement.

Which pretty much applies to all tanks but instead of dart destabilization and ammo protecting carousels they only get a shoot here to disable module.

Pretty sure i didnt mention anything about easier to play just that no matter how strong anyone thinks they are, russian tanks profit from some very questionable modeling decisions

1 Like