I don’t think that T-series tanks have smaller weakspots than what you find on Tiger IIs or Panthers, especially when you have to aim for them with much slower rounds and without a stabilizer.
1 Like
Ive seen Russian t90s and similar cover their whole front side with bushes making it near impossible to hit their weak spots (smart but annoying).
1 Like
guys stop comparing each other with stats (your late to the game and we are well past that).
Yes, france, one of the best top tier nations is dogwater, sure.
I am willing to bet a premium vehicle against that claim.
1 Like
R77-1 tracking at ground level without multipathing, ignoring notching and chaffs while AIM 120 cannot hit SU 30 going STRAIGHT in 3km alt because it suddenly loose lock or track first chaff it sees… its performance anywhere under 500 meters i don’t need address…
You could call it late, I would call it early for the next round.
1 Like
your not tuff -_-
I know I’m not, and that wasn’t the point. I just know that SadRIPer will try to act like they are a good player again. He is just a broken record like that.
So why beat around the bush and just get it over with.
2 Likes
Pay up then
Sure, as soon as you let your claim become reality.
3 Likes
Please lets not forget that Gaijin left one of their vehicles with this damage model for YEARS and they fixed it (idk if they fixed it tho, i guess they did) once ppl noticed and started doing videos about it.
This was when Ka50 - 52 spam Destroyed lobbies and everyone complained about it, and its been like that for VERY LONG, till new helis were added and etc.
The average op russian vehicle of the moment
5 Likes
I’d bet that this guy will barely be able to go positive in the 12.7 Russian vehicles lol.
4 Likes
No missile ignores multipathing.
And when notching, no missile ignores chaff. Once chaff disappears the missile can re-acquire a non-maneuvering target, but that’s about it.
All* helicopters.
The way they fixed it was updating the general helicopter flight model, which fixed all helicopters, and obviously impacted Kamovs a bit more.
2 Likes
If Russian bias exists, then by the same standards US bias and German bias exist too. These nations are treated much better by Gaijin, consistently have the most powerful and undertiered vehicles, and have bug reports addressed and actioned upon faster and more often.
It’s a self-reinforcing loop, originating from the extreme gap between the popularity of Big 3 nations and every other tech tree. The player population of the latter category spend more, perform worse in battles (leading to favourable balance adjustments), and have a much bigger control over community sentiment/pressure.
When you look at top tier, these nations almost always have the best vehicles. This is extremely obvious in the technology advancement update cycle: major nations get the newest and most advanced vehicles, whereas the equivalent vehicles of minor nations come months or years later. The opposite situation rarely occurs, and is the exception rather than the rule.
1 Like
oooh it does. namely R77-1 not completely but is much much less susceptible to it. It have no problem tracking and hitting even nothing plane at 10m RA while AIM 120 loose track on planes flying straight at altitude.
You know we have data sheets with seeker stats straight from the files right?
(credit to the authors of the sheet of course)
The AIM-120 and R-77-1 have identical seekers in game. The only ARHs with better seekers are the AIM-54s, Fakours and MICA-EM iirc.
3 Likes
you know that this means absolutely nothing right? BMPT have FCS and electronics modules modeled but they were disabled in code for that specific vehicle, just likey every ATGM vehicle have handpicked missile launcher damage model, despite general rule… but yea keep coping
1 Like
If you have any actual evidence that the R-77-1 has a better seeker feel free to share it.
However “just trust me bro” or “it came to me in a dream” level statements like yours aren’t very trustworthy.
5 Likes
you can search for multiple vidoes of people complaining and showing in sensor view how R77 tracks planes at 5 meters above ground without any problem while AIM 120 missing plane going HEAD on at 1km alt. And if i have to choose if i ahve to believe those vidoes and my VAST experience in sim vs gaijin word i will pick the 1st. We all know how gaijin copy paste vehicles but the one vehicle they “forget” to model something here and there. Just like BMPT somehow missing damageable modules, T tanks having reduced spalling and so on… Not my problem you guys need to lie to yourself in order to pretend this game doesn’t have selective modeling for certain vehicles or nation…
I can also cherry pick videos that show the opposite happening.
You forget a very important thing. Nobody mentioned Gaijin’s word. The data sheet I linked has stats datamined directly from the game files/code, which was datamined/put together by a group of very credible people (including Gszabi). None of these people work for Gaijin.
So yeah I believe a document made by credible dataminers over a random guy on the forum.
Talk about coping lol.
6 Likes