Yeah lol.
In the end I return to Russia to chill and calm myself.
Hypersonic missiles alongside with ice cold coke and good old Spotify list do wonders to your body.
Certainly sounds better than Cortisolmaxxing in 10.7 sweden
2 Likes
multiple nations? No… absolute No. Only Russia is valuable …other nations not any chance. Russia for win ,no need to develop any other countries tree.
3 Likes
There will always be a meta, that comes with having such a variety of unique vehicles.
It’s impossible for a game like WT to not have a meta., unless you make all vehicles in a BR range have exactly the same values.
1 Like
I have fun with pretty much every nation I play except Russia. I mostly enjoy MBT gameplay so Russia just doesn’t offer me anything I enjoy.
Masochistic opinions dont count. /s
4 Likes
The problem with NERA is the exact composite array on the newer Abrams isn’t known, nor is it known the exact material composition. Gaijin’s penetration calculator isn’t perfect either. It uses a formula over historical values, which leads to inconsistencies. ERA is also a problem because Gaijin models it as a piece of breakable armor with no account for AoA. Hitting Relikt at a flat angle will still give the 250mm KE protection (even though hitting the plates at that angle would completely nullify the ERA’s explosive effect).
In other words, NATO ERAs are a piece of paper ingame
No you misconstrue my words. I never said it was paper, it’s just a problem with how ERA is modeled. With ARAT I’m not sure if there are even publicly available values for KE protection. When it had the 120mm KE protection when it was first implemented, I believe they either used K-5 or Relikt as the base model then plugged in the values. It was probably changed to the other NATO ERA models/formula once it got bug reported.
Funny enough I enjoy my T-90M and T-80UE-1 quite a lot.
Despite having abysmal vertical speed, bad gun depression and seeing full uptier most of the time T-80UE-1 is my best performing Russian tank so far.
I believe I got almost 2.5 K/D in that thing, shows how perfectly capable and strong tank despite its drawbacks.
2 Likes
Definitly RUSSIAN BIAS today!!!
5 tanks 5 matches, J’d out because side pen NOPE!!! Disgusting and obvious!
Bored of this blatant one sidedness,!
1 Like
Agree… but gaijin disagree…Russia always get all kinds OP vehicle / wepon , especially precision guidance missile
1 Like
Ah man, I was just about to write a 5 page essay about how the Arietes are goated and secretly the best MBTs in game :(
(/s just in case)
1 Like
Today so far :
9 12.7 GRB games played as France. All the losses are against Russia. 4 wins, among them 1 with Russia
=> 5+1 = 6 wins out of 9 games = 66.67% winrate for Russia.
And the wins for Russia… weren’t “hard wins”… no… very easy wins, almost always spawncamped in spawn 3 minutes after the game starts…
Never was able to get a nuke when facing Russia… I got a nuke at 12.7 while playing with Russia… with a VBCI 1…
It tells you how easy it is to play top tier as Russia…
1 Like
not many, and even so, you just admitted that there is Russian Bias (BMPT).
Not too bad at all.
I have never denied that the BMPT was broken (I personally don’t struggle against them, but I can still see why and how it is broken).
The only gripe/problem I had with the whole Russian bias discussion has always been people overhyping Russian MBTs.
Discussions about Bias in general would be way better if people stopped acting like bias = overpowered when that is not necessarily true.
5 Likes
Must be the French bias.
Taken in consideration the fact I cannot have the nuke against top top tier Russia → no
It’s just that Russia was overdominant during this game (as during the large majority of other top top tier games), and thus the kills were very easy to get (the ennemy NATO team kinda gave up midgame, they knew they couldn’t do anything against Russia anyway)
Ah yes the Russian bias users number 1 got to “Skill issue” lol