Yea will do, 11k away from my last Rank 6 jet, so will have it soon
1 Like
Something.
But mostly ignored that we comparing AIM-54 to R-24 before MiG-29 addition and buff.
Started comparing AIM-54 to R-27ER which was not the point.
The point was if one missile can completley dictate terms on game in which we say it’s OP (R-27ER) why we can’t say same thing about other missile (AIM-54) which allowed one team to completley forced one team to stay on low altitute in order to survive.
Don’t forget. The Pantsir SM-SV has AP-T belt. It can be used as a lolpenner DCA at top top tier as well. Another additionnal element to add to my very long list related to russian bias.
Which other NATO DCA can be used the same way at top top tier ? Gepard 1A2 maybe ? But it has trash missiles for this BR. Every other NATO DCA is either too slow/non-stabilized/has a worse radar/pens less/has few to none APDS in comparaison.
Keep in mind Russia already has the 2S6, easily usable at top top tier as a competitive DCA as well.
Again, another obvious advantage for Russia in this game. I regret I put so much $$$ in the US, if I knew how it was going to be regarding Russia
EDIT : Btw just learned SM-SV is capable of pening NATO MBTs side armors with its main missiles. 12 ready-to-fire missiles btw. Completely op
EDIT 2 : I counted 3 wins for Russia out of 4 games played. And they were not “hard wins”, they were easy wins if you watch the video. Russia wins large majority of top tier games
You’re the one who brought R27ER to the table, try not to twist our convo.
See this is why you have comprehending issues.
I never said nor claimed that R27ER is op during our conversation, you’re the one who brought to 27ER and claimed that its not op because I refuse to call Phoenix op as well.
Thats why you play multiple nations to avoid suffering 24/7.
Personally whenever I got bored/angry by playing other nations I just simply switch to Russia, spawn in Pantsir SV-SM and enjoy my ice cold coke while listening my favorite music list.
Its so simple.
2 Likes
Western MBTs, Abrams, Leopards are simply too squishy. Their side armor is too thin. Also sad Pantsirs drop MBTs with frontal shots/Sams.
When I’m in my Iris-T, I’m totally helpless against anything on the ground and this guy just consistently kills everything air and ground alike. They really need to make rus better than everyone else, every single time. As if BUK and the Pantsir truck wasn’t already enough.
1 Like
This is not normal Russia is the META by default
There shouldn’t be any META
The bias is so obvious at this point
You can also notice in the video that NATO side armor ERAs (SEP V2 for example) are basically useless against it. It can easily pen with main cannons and missiles.
It’s like they were just cosmetics
In a perfect world maybe but in this reality Gaijin loves to shift meta to one nation to other.
One way or another Meta returns to Russia tho.
1 Like
Thats great advice but only if one of the nations you play is russia otherwise youre still going to suffer lol
2 Likes
Well i brought it as an example of situation after missile was added.
Well opinion of the majority of players cosiders R-27ER as OP weapon and i was under this impression. Well if by your opinion R-27ER is not OP then there is no question left.
Yeah lol.
In the end I return to Russia to chill and calm myself.
Hypersonic missiles alongside with ice cold coke and good old Spotify list do wonders to your body.
Certainly sounds better than Cortisolmaxxing in 10.7 sweden
2 Likes
multiple nations? No… absolute No. Only Russia is valuable …other nations not any chance. Russia for win ,no need to develop any other countries tree.
3 Likes
There will always be a meta, that comes with having such a variety of unique vehicles.
It’s impossible for a game like WT to not have a meta., unless you make all vehicles in a BR range have exactly the same values.
1 Like
I have fun with pretty much every nation I play except Russia. I mostly enjoy MBT gameplay so Russia just doesn’t offer me anything I enjoy.
Masochistic opinions dont count. /s
4 Likes
The problem with NERA is the exact composite array on the newer Abrams isn’t known, nor is it known the exact material composition. Gaijin’s penetration calculator isn’t perfect either. It uses a formula over historical values, which leads to inconsistencies. ERA is also a problem because Gaijin models it as a piece of breakable armor with no account for AoA. Hitting Relikt at a flat angle will still give the 250mm KE protection (even though hitting the plates at that angle would completely nullify the ERA’s explosive effect).
In other words, NATO ERAs are a piece of paper ingame
No you misconstrue my words. I never said it was paper, it’s just a problem with how ERA is modeled. With ARAT I’m not sure if there are even publicly available values for KE protection. When it had the 120mm KE protection when it was first implemented, I believe they either used K-5 or Relikt as the base model then plugged in the values. It was probably changed to the other NATO ERA models/formula once it got bug reported.