Don’t forget. The Pantsir SM-SV has AP-T belt. It can be used as a lolpenner DCA at top top tier as well. Another additionnal element to add to my very long list related to russian bias.
Which other NATO DCA can be used the same way at top top tier ? Gepard 1A2 maybe ? But it has trash missiles for this BR. Every other NATO DCA is either too slow/non-stabilized/has a worse radar/pens less/has few to none APDS in comparaison.
Keep in mind Russia already has the 2S6, easily usable at top top tier as a competitive DCA as well.
Again, another obvious advantage for Russia in this game. I regret I put so much $$$ in the US, if I knew how it was going to be regarding Russia
EDIT : Btw just learned SM-SV is capable of pening NATO MBTs side armors with its main missiles. 12 ready-to-fire missiles btw. Completely op
EDIT 2 : I counted 3 wins for Russia out of 4 games played. And they were not “hard wins”, they were easy wins if you watch the video. Russia wins large majority of top tier games
You’re the one who brought R27ER to the table, try not to twist our convo.
See this is why you have comprehending issues.
I never said nor claimed that R27ER is op during our conversation, you’re the one who brought to 27ER and claimed that its not op because I refuse to call Phoenix op as well.
Thats why you play multiple nations to avoid suffering 24/7.
Personally whenever I got bored/angry by playing other nations I just simply switch to Russia, spawn in Pantsir SV-SM and enjoy my ice cold coke while listening my favorite music list.
Western MBTs, Abrams, Leopards are simply too squishy. Their side armor is too thin. Also sad Pantsirs drop MBTs with frontal shots/Sams.
When I’m in my Iris-T, I’m totally helpless against anything on the ground and this guy just consistently kills everything air and ground alike. They really need to make rus better than everyone else, every single time. As if BUK and the Pantsir truck wasn’t already enough.
You can also notice in the video that NATO side armor ERAs (SEP V2 for example) are basically useless against it. It can easily pen with main cannons and missiles.
Well i brought it as an example of situation after missile was added.
Well opinion of the majority of players cosiders R-27ER as OP weapon and i was under this impression. Well if by your opinion R-27ER is not OP then there is no question left.
The problem with NERA is the exact composite array on the newer Abrams isn’t known, nor is it known the exact material composition. Gaijin’s penetration calculator isn’t perfect either. It uses a formula over historical values, which leads to inconsistencies. ERA is also a problem because Gaijin models it as a piece of breakable armor with no account for AoA. Hitting Relikt at a flat angle will still give the 250mm KE protection (even though hitting the plates at that angle would completely nullify the ERA’s explosive effect).
No you misconstrue my words. I never said it was paper, it’s just a problem with how ERA is modeled. With ARAT I’m not sure if there are even publicly available values for KE protection. When it had the 120mm KE protection when it was first implemented, I believe they either used K-5 or Relikt as the base model then plugged in the values. It was probably changed to the other NATO ERA models/formula once it got bug reported.