Still. For a game claiming unbiased realism. I dont find fair that pretty much every Japanese or german gun can be easly gun barrelled or at least made orange with its own gun or guns at the br and while every russian vehicle with 76s 57s mm zis guns can not. Japan can pretty much do nothing aggainst such foe especially in like sim battles where very fair gaijin puts stuff like Chi-nu aggainst those exact guns and aggainst like this exact KV chi-nu cant do anything about.
While shermans and others can just gun barrel and track angled tigers and go around but theres just nothing you can do aggainst angled KVs if you cant actually pen it its armor.
this doesnt apply just to the russians tho, guns without muzzle breaks which still uses old models tends to eat shots unless you hit the barrel itself.
Its more of the fact that when I try to play my Wolfpack, which for some reason gets uptired to 11.3 every match, on estray bullet and I die instantly, or they use the tech of only peaking their guns and missiles out.
If gaijin added mixed battles atleast as an option. Then matchmaking would be alot more balanced.
Then the better players playing will be alot more spread out on the teams considering their tanks etc.
They have autoloaders which can still shoot even when destroyed (while NATO autoloaders can’t do that), when they repair => they have priority of repair on the cannon and breech (while NATO is the tracks and engine), their IFV belts don’t instantly disappear when destroyed (like the BMPT => while NATO IFVs loose all their ammunition if their belts are destroyed), their Mi/Ka main cannon are way WAY more accurate than NATO helicopters…
What do you want to do against that ? They’re just artificially buffed like crazy, there is obviously a bias in this game lmao
Do i have to chew this for you ?
This isn’t about R-27E OP or not it’s about your flawed logic where if missile can be dodged by multipathing it’s not OP.
By whom ? As far i can see F-14A and MiG-23MLD have 1.0 br. difference that is quite big difference for this quote to be true
And even that F-4J that was added before F-14A and it has higher br. than MLD so yeah devalued by who ? Your little delulu club ?
Huh.
Yeah but it’s not about R-27ER vs AIM-54A/B/C it’s about AIM-54 vs R-24 and first ARH missiles in the game is quite powerful thing agaisnt R-24 that has maximum range of 15-20km.
Armament difference and player effectiveness comes in to hand.
Fox-3 capable planes are seperated by Fox-1 platforms by br system long ago.
More like people like you who can’t even utilize MLD’s performance causing this issue.
F4J is helpless against MLD in every situation and your behavior proves my point even more.
Yeah if you stick at high altitude and ignore all the warnings than Phoenix is more effective than R24R, in practice R24R is more suitable for actual clusterfk due to bein superior on close range and more resistance to notching, chaffing.
Phoenix missiles are just big skill check, nothing more.
