Gaijin does not have control over win rates.
Gaijin cannot and should not forbid skilled players from playing specific tech trees.
If gaijin added mixed battles atleast as an option. Then matchmaking would be alot more balanced.
Then the better players playing will be alot more spread out on the teams considering their tanks etc.
That would also make “OP” tanks be on both teams, making them fight eachother.
They have autoloaders which can still shoot even when destroyed (while NATO autoloaders can’t do that), when they repair => they have priority of repair on the cannon and breech (while NATO is the tracks and engine), their IFV belts don’t instantly disappear when destroyed (like the BMPT => while NATO IFVs loose all their ammunition if their belts are destroyed), their Mi/Ka main cannon are way WAY more accurate than NATO helicopters…
What do you want to do against that ? They’re just artificially buffed like crazy, there is obviously a bias in this game lmao
1 Like
“Wasn’t” is the key word in here.
Doesnt change the fact that 27ER was and still best Fox-1 missile that still beats most Fox-3’s in terms chaff resistance and kinetic performance.
R27ER sits at its own league and has nothing to do with our conversation.
I don’t know why you people bother complaining, it’s not going away, lol. Maybe get the other nations to make better equipment? idk
Bait used to believable…
5 Likes
Do i have to chew this for you ?
This isn’t about R-27E OP or not it’s about your flawed logic where if missile can be dodged by multipathing it’s not OP.
1 Like
According to you, who?
Thank god we’re living in a world where certain nation main’s opinion doesn’t hold any value.
Bein quite powerful is something and bein straight up overpowered is something.
In this case both missiles are quite powerful, in fact R27ER is better than Aim-54 in most cases.
You got anything to say other than bringing irrevelant points to the discussion?
1 Like
By whom ? As far i can see F-14A and MiG-23MLD have 1.0 br. difference that is quite big difference for this quote to be true
And even that F-4J that was added before F-14A and it has higher br. than MLD so yeah devalued by who ? Your little delulu club ?
Huh.
Yeah but it’s not about R-27ER vs AIM-54A/B/C it’s about AIM-54 vs R-24 and first ARH missiles in the game is quite powerful thing agaisnt R-24 that has maximum range of 15-20km.
1 Like
Armament difference and player effectiveness comes in to hand.
Fox-3 capable planes are seperated by Fox-1 platforms by br system long ago.
More like people like you who can’t even utilize MLD’s performance causing this issue.
F4J is helpless against MLD in every situation and your behavior proves my point even more.
Yeah if you stick at high altitude and ignore all the warnings than Phoenix is more effective than R24R, in practice R24R is more suitable for actual clusterfk due to bein superior on close range and more resistance to notching, chaffing.
Phoenix missiles are just big skill check, nothing more.
For no reason ? Or maybe because For-3 is more capable than Fox-1 ?
How ? How my behavior prooves your point that my opinion has no value while F-4J literally has higher br. than MLD ?
Well same thing can be said about R-27ER.
We’re not talking about Aim-120/R-77 or Pl-12 in here, Phoenix is straight up worst Fox-3 in game.
Do I need to remind you that F4F ICE sits at same br where F-14B despite having much better Fox-2/3 missiles?
Because you suck in both planes, that’s why, in fact you have worse ratio in MLD compare to your F4S’s.
Do I also need to remind you that F4S is better than 4J due to slats?
In same case scenario indeed it is, the thing is R27ER is much more capable in any scenario compare to Phoenix missile tho.
I still dont understand why you’re yapping about ER since no one has mentioned it in the first place.
And ? What it has to do with MiG-23MLD vs F-14A where F-14A sits higher br. only because of it’s Fox-3 ? While F-2 ADTW and JAS39A share same br. with ARH carriers ?
And it sits in higher br than MLD so your opinion is completley worhless and people who thing F-4J is better than MLD has won.
So thats why Su-27 has to stick to lower altitude and have same br. as F-14B despite having better avionics and R-73.
You don’t understand it because it’s not about 27ER it’s about your flawed logic and your cope and attempts to ad hominem shows it.
Thats what I’m talking about in case you still didn’t understand, the whole reason why Tomcat sits higher br than MLD is because of primitive Fox-3 missiles and better radar, in every other category MLD shits on F-14A.
As for the JAS39A and F2 ADTW both planes has superior flight/Avionic performance, much better ir missiles, more countermeasures oh and JAS39A has also BOL pods and HMD, these advantages makes Phoenix completely irrevelant.
Is that so smart guy?
Lets compare our stats then.
My Stats:
MiG-23MLD: 3.6 K/D
F4J: 2.2 K/D
Your Stats:
F4S: 1.5 K/D
Mig23MLD: 1.49 K/D
Despite sitting at higher br you only managed to get 0.1 better ratio in your F4S compare to your MLD’s, meanwhile my MLD stats shits on my F4J’s.
What’s funny thing is despite bein worse than F4S my F4J has better stats compare to your so called “better” F4S.
This just shows people like you cant even use F4S let alone the MLD properly 9/10 times.
Lmao, Su-27 doesn’t need to sit lower against F-14B, you can just simply fly sideways before Phoenix lock on to you, pass the barrage and kill Tomcat players easily with R27ER’s but I don’t expect you to understand this basic concept considering your performance below average on those jets.
Says the guy who can’t even use those vehicles properly while talking about coping and flawed logic.
My my someone needs a reality check it seems.
And by the same logic how R-27ER is OP ? Let me remind you when Su-27 was added with charecteristics of prototyple that has worse avionics and AL-21 engine had no chance against F-15A in dogfight and despite that R-27ER is OP but AIM-54 is not ?
Oh wow and ? This stat comparison is going to change fact that F-4J/S have higher br. than MLD ? Whats next it’s going to make Earth flat ?
Well again what stopped F-15A players just stick to lower altitude dodge the R-27ER barrage and shoot down all Su-27 ? You just describing unexisting scenario for 16-16 brawl.
Brother you trying to ad hominem the reality where F-14B and Su-27 have same br. and F-4J/S have higher br than MLD.
The J-15T also sits at a higher BR than the Su-30SM/MKM while being at best a sidegrade, arguably even worse.
2 Likes
Please show me where did mention R27ER’s bein OP during our conversation, I’m waiting.
And? When did I say initial Su-27 was better than F-15 in every single way? Once again you’re strawmanning.
No, it just shows people like you are the reason why MLD sits 0.3 lower br than objectively worse plane.
Just like how current F-15A models sitting at 12.7 despite they should never recieve br reduction in the first place.
Conversation wasn’t about the F-15 to begin with it, you’re just getting more desperate by bringing irrevelant vehicles to our current conversation topic.
At least F-14B and Su-27’s are somehow balanced at same br while having different pros and cons while F4J/S is straight up worse than MLD in almost every category.
Your knowledge about in game vehicles are so bad that you don’t even know what you’re talking about, aside from strawmanning and coping of course.
Exactly.
These type of people looks at br choice made by Gaijin and thinks/claims that the vehicle that sits at higher br is automatically better.
1 Like
I trust gaijin and think desert warrior is just as strong as bmd4 or cv9040b
1 Like