Russian Bias in 2026?

If gaijin would just add HARMs… I feel like that would be the perfect match.

I mean they are testing them now in nuclear thunder.
The question is how usefull they will be since i got 0 kills on SPAA with them but like 3 air to air kills lmao.

1 Like

They’ve been testing them a lot recently.

If they get added you can take HARMs for the SPAAs, then MLs for tanks and such.

1 Like

Yes, it’s called russian bias

2 Likes

If it were up to me I’d also nerf FNF heli missiles as well, (Not JUST the LMUR).

Man, yesterday I got hit by a JAGM on my SAMPT, and my crew and only some part of the modules went YELLOW

It NEVER happens with the LMURS, it’s an assured kill with only 1 missile with them, 100%

Needing 2-4 missiles to destroy MBTs/SPAAs with JAGMs is crazy

1 Like

I meant more so spawn points wise.

In my opinion, the fact that every soviet player has access to the best free SPAA in the game balances out underperforming BUK. New Pantsir SM-SV absolutely was not needed

3 Likes

Is the BMPT absolutely broken?

1 Like

Russian players after ignoring the fact that the bmpt plauges any br its at and all the ones above.

6 Likes

Yeah ignoring how invincible the BMPT is having the 3 best spaa in the game and let’s not get started on the LEMURs being absolutely broken lol

1 Like

Russia having the best spaa, two extremley broken tanks, some of the best mbts, the best heli, and the best cas.

1 Like

Their mbts haven’t been some of the best for years now. They are only really good at bullying noobies.

It was.

It’s a very annoying vehicle which should be 12.0

Thats about it. If you can’t kill it there thats a skill issue.

2 Likes

Gaijin released F-14 to capitalize on the Top gun Maverick release. I had nothing to do with the MLD. And on release F-14 was ridiculous bouth in flight-model and weapons. Initially the radar had faster refresh rate then the current EF AESA and was the only one with TWS. Remember back then RWR’s didn’t had launch indications, so “passing Phoenix barrage” wasn’t like today. Let’s not forget that after the F-14 launch, we when from nations vs nations in to mixed battles in ARB… the only con was the extremely hot IR signature (in order to flare IR missile, you had to pull back to 50% thrust and then flare).
And it’s rain surpased the addition of the F-16 and MiG-29, when the F-14 ramain the true apex predator.

1 Like

Which extremely broken tanks in question? Which some of the best MBTs? Which best heli? And CAS yeah sure i guess i’ll give you that one

thats not how this works

F-14A was already planned prior to the Mig-23MLD’s addition.

BMPT as it loses matches at 12.7 because it’s worse than T-90M, and even slightly worse than Challenger 2 TES.

Soviets don’t currently have a top-5 MBT currently due to mobility meta.
Japan also has identical CAS.

4 Likes

What a joke of a post

Ragebaiter no ?

8 Likes

Well I’ll be, I thought Renzo said I was trash at the game, America top tier with the Abrams, but when I play Russia 10.7, I got win after win, with getting sub top 5 in every game. (Besides the two lost rounds from 1 death leaving players).

Crazy how that works??

2 Likes

It had nothing to do with Top Gun Maverick and they explained it multiple times.

It had everything to do with MLD, just like how F4E and MiG-21Bis released after and after to shift meta.

Because current refresh rate is not even close to real life performance, We know that both AESA Typhoons and Rafale has much higher refresh rate in real life but somehow Gaijin refuses to model it, meanwhile IRBIS radar has higher refres rate than those radar while in reality its the opposite.

It was quite easy, while you didn’t get launch warning like you use during these days Phoenix missiles still gave you solid lock which any person who has more than one braincell would understood what was about to happen. Not to mention back in the day dodging any kind of radar missile was quite easy.

No shit considering it was also superior plane in real life.

1 Like