Russian Bias in 2026?

And vehicles that sucked.

See, you’re mincing words. As realistic as we can possibly get. If it’s “game breaking.” Then don’t add it.

bruh

Okay, cool. Then you have One-circle fighters win all the time. The Mig-21bis should be unstable at excessively high AoA, Mig-21 pilots were told not to pull that hard IRL. but gaijin lets the instructor pull that hard, because the instructor more or less acts like a god-tier fly-by-wire. Allowing aircraft to pull maneuvers they shouldn’t be doing.

T-80B is stronger Again, the biggest issue is the reverse gear. Any hulldown environment and you’re needing to pixel snipe. The gun mantlets on most NATO tanks are massive making it easy to kill them.

All the same weakspots. The only good thing about it is that you get multiple abrams that behave functionally the same, this allows you to stick around for a long time. That’s one advantage that most nations don’t have and that’s what makes U.S. lineups more “durable” than others.

But I’m glad you brought up the M1A2. Because when the M1A2SEP v2 came out, people actually DISLIKED it over the regular M1A2 because the tank was not only even HEAVIER and slower now, the CROWS basically gave away your position constantly.

You do realize… That even if you overhaul an engine, unless you literally scrap the whole engine and rebuild the engine from the ground up. You still have old code from deprecated unused features that can rear their head from time to time when they badly interact with something new.

The Gamebryo engine was overhauled several times, And then was used as the basis for the Creation engine. If you ever did modding for Fallout 4 and Skyrim. You can still see old features from Morrowind that actually carried over old bugs or caused new ones.

Some rounds still use the old Hitpower mechanics from almost a decade ago and it causes a massive amount of inconsistent performance.

It still is overperforming though. what made it “Go down in effectiveness” is that you don’t have an endless supply of phantoms to maul.
In fact, on initial release, there was times you would have mixed matches where there’d be Mig-21s on the U.S. side as well.

The biggest the F-4E got was a fix to it’s AoA within a month? Two months? Of it’s addition and the AIM-7E-2 was added months later, roughly around when the Viggen came out.

I was merely stating it as a matter of fact. Frontally, the AIM-7E-2 in a frontal aspect was actually better the AIM-7F. Especially in jousts.

The AIM-9Ls were good at that time but they weren’t end-all-be-all until you they were at a lower BR fighting Mig-21s, F-4s and craft. Again. Event F-4E got the AIM-9Ls and we see that the R-60 was better for missile jousts. The R27ER was a good compromise at the time by basically being super maneuverable. And this was supported by an HMD, something the F-16A didn’t have. Oh and R-27T. So you got stuff like this. The AIM-9Ls were the stronger option over the AIM-7s though.

Point is to show that the Mig-23 could keep up flight performance wise… I’m not saying it was better. It’s not like fighting an Su-27 with a F-100. They both had pretty great turn rates.

I mean, point was that you had the equivalent of an AIM-7E-2 but you could silently cue it and launch it at the enemy. The F-14 still has issues of being extremely hot, even in the front. The F-5C has a similar issue but it actually helps it which is why the F-5 is super cold and hard to lock on to. in the rear

It straight did though. You had look-down capability, better radar missiles, and the Mig-23 overperformed so much that the F-4E literally couldn’t fight back against it. You couldn’t outrate him, nothing. It was a massive improvement over the Mig-21. The only difference was that the Mig-23 had less radar missiles but the R-60s were straight better than the J’s.

It didn’t help that everyone played it. So you literally had F-14s on both match and the Top gun movie made it worse where it had a much larger presence when later on, the F-14 shock was gone.

The Mig-23 shock went away but it was just acceptance you couldn’t beat the Mig-23 in the F-4E and you still had an overperforming Mig-21. So basically for two patches the F-4E got dookied on.

You know the AIM-7F is supposed to have introduced a dynamically optimized autopilot that handles this dynamically, instead of the Dogfight mode fallback, of having to select from a set of constants.

War Thunder doesn’t properly account for how the F-4’s FCS functions, and really the only aircraft it would impact are those with access to the AIM-7E & AIM-7F (F-4, F-14 & F-15).

And the modeling of said feature for the AIM-7F is rough, and modeled as to conserve it’s long range performance due to arbitrarily constructed ramping the G-load based of Time To Go cutoffs instead of being smooth like it should.

Not at short range, especially after the arming delay for the proximity fuse (1.8 seconds), and control surface lockout was modeled.

Where would you even use the AIM-9L preferentially to the AIM-7F?

It also had a radar that couldn’t detect aircraft with a low / negative closure rate (even though it should), had engines that are significantly hotter than they should be (due to how engine temperatures are based of cockpit instruments) and is stuck with rear aspect IR missiles.

These days you can’t even run a 2+3+2 loadout due to the AIM-54’s requiring the forward tunnel stations for coolant (not an issue for the AIM-54C+), being exclusive with rear tunnel AIM-7s.

Yeah, because the F-5 turned up the same patch, in Red Skys which mean that MiG-21Bis had someone on a similar footing.

it was not

it was released in December 2022
its flight model was actually buffed slightly just after it was released
its major flight model nerf was in October of 2023

im pretty sure 10 months is not “like a week”

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

2 Likes

You play couple of nice balanced 9.0-9.7 matches.

You decide to come back at 12.7 :

9 games played, 9 games won by Russia (all losses were against Russia, all wins were alongwith Russia).

Holy unbalanced game, they completely ruined top tier GRB, and they don’t even bother doing anything about that.

Now the general rule for top tier GRB : you don’t play Russia, don’t expect to win too much.

4 Likes

why is your game so bright-
image

Not the game, it’s only the screenshots that are like that. It’s the HDR somehow

1 Like

Ah, I see.

Man it’s very sad what they’ve made of top tier grb

Every single time I play couple of games there, Russia always wins large majority of the games. It’s been like that for months, years

EDIT : and they don’t even make the effort to listen to their customers/investors. I mean, we western players did and still bring them some money, they should give us a little something no ?

First time I see a company spitting on the people bringing them money on purpose

I feel like if they got rid of the Kh-38MT then Russia wouldn’t be NEARLY as dominant as it is now.

I’ve played a lot of Russia, and quite a bit of Japan (as well as some US/GER), especially at top tier, and I don’t really have issues killing T-90Ms or BVMs (though the second is typically much tougher).

But going against MTs is just not fun.

I feel like if the Su-34 and Su-30SM/SM2 was limited to MLs, Groms (Groms are Kh-38 derivatives) and Kh-29s, then the game would be much easier and funner to play at top tier.

I don’t think MTs on the Su-25SM3 is a big issue though. since, well, it’s a Su-25, barely anyone plays it because of how slow it is.

2 Likes

No wonder why bro keeps losing games because he weren’t even playing the game as he was video calling the afterlife.

4 Likes

What you described alongside a big nerf/fix to LDIRCM in general would go a long way to make top tier more enjoyable.

1 Like

True, I forgot about LDIRCM.

If it were up to me I’d also nerf FNF heli missiles as well, (Not JUST the LMUR).

The amount of times I’ve played top tier ground sim only to get touched right after spawning, and be unable to spawn afterwards due to the sheer amount of FNF ammunition is… infuriating.

1 Like

Also fix the FNF missile trajectories.

to my understanding only the LMUR is correct atm when it comes to flight pattern.

3 Likes

Anyway. On the topic of Russian bias, I’ve said it before and I feel like it’s the most fair take.

I find it hard to say if there is Russian bias in the game.

If there is, it’s most certainly ground focused.

Things like the BMPT were added at wayyyyyyyyy too low of a BR. It should be ~12.3 with APFSDS in my opinion.
But at the same time, Gaijin has had some horrible BR placements recently. (T-58, J-15T…) so it may have just been another one of their abysmal ideas.

I can only justify the SM-SV with the fact that technically, the Buk-M3 is one of the Lowest K/D AA’s in the game at top tier
image
image
image

However, Russia is certainly not Biased when it comes to air.

Things like the MiG-29 Flight model still haven’t been fixed, and the bandaid that was adding R-73 to the 9-13 and moving it to 13.0 is a joke.

It took nearly a year to fix the Flanker FM after constantly getting denied. Hell, the Gaijin staff refused to use the Su-27SK manual until it was explained that the J-11 IS a Su-27SK.

Back when the Su-27SM was added the R-77 was considered one of the worse Fox-3s (This was a long time ago, I know.), I’d have to look to find it but one of the mods said that “The R-77-1 will provide no significant change over the current R-77”.

The most biased thing when it comes to air are the MK2, but that’s an issue of BR compression. (Which we need fixed.) and maybe the dual racks on Flankers.

The SM2 is also insanely good, but I’d hesitate to call it broken when it’s the same BR as the Raf and AESA Typhoon (which would be better if the AMRAAM was fixed)

1 Like

To everything I know the guns are incapable of firing APDSFS, and giving them it would just stoke the fire the more for some rather outspoken russian bias claimers. Also considering the BMPT’s performance in 12.7 lobbies, wouldn’t need it either

2 Likes

Pretty sure it’s the same gun as the BMP-2M, no?

I’ve used the BMPT-72 and BMP-2M a lot at top tier, the APFSDS definitely helps a lot.

While it’s technically the same gun and possible, Russia irl doesn’t make/use 30mm APDSFS, the BMP-2M only got it as another country used it and technical capability argument was made, same reason Su-30MKM has Kh-38MT’s despite them never coming along with the plane in irl sales.

1 Like

BUK also looks out of place as the launcher unit is about 100 foot tall so they are exposed on 90% of the maps and you pretty much find the missile tip on every maps lol sneeze on that 1 inch exposed tip they goes boom. They should allowed those multi vehicle systems SAMs to move out of bounds, seeing these things sits in advance to the rhine makes my orange cat goes braindead.

1 Like

I mean, to my understanding Malaysia never bought RVV-SD either, only RVV-AE. So it should be stuck with R-77s. :p

1 Like