The current state of this game :
Level 47, 50 nukes
Of course, a russian main only. Bro knows what the META is in this game, he’s not wasting time.
Playing Russia = TUTORIAL MODE.
Edit : No, this is not a smurf. Nobody smurf WT through another painful grind.
Meanwhile you are perfectly fine to leave vehicles like the IPM1, M1A1 and M1A1 HC/M1A2 completely undertiered, and your only argument is “MuH aRmOr”.
I have nothing against fixing the Abrams. However most of them should already move up in BR in their current state, the only reason you deny this is because of your personal skill issue.
Plenty of people do lmao. Just wait until you join an sqb squadron and find out about these things called alt accounts.
It’s GPU-5/A, not GBU.
and besides the relevant excerpt(s) from the video state
“It Can be installed on the MAU-12, or Aero-27 bomb rack”
“Aircraft like the F-4, A-7 and F-15 can fly the GPU-5/A without modication”
This explains why it can be mounted on any particular member of the F-15 familiy, and why the Brochure lists the F-15, without specifying a particular variant because it fits all of them and proper integration would be worked up post-sale.
GPU-5/A 30 mm Gunpod for the F-15E
“The attached videos and photos show the F-15B-4-MC aircraft with tail number 71-0291, which is the prototype of the F-15E Strike Eagle. This aircraft differs significantly from the single-seat fighter version of the F-15A.”
Further due to a fair helping of absolute BS it now also relies on exact configurations, since the Prototype TF-15A(F-15B) used as part for the Strike Eagle Program, isn’t enough to have it implemented on the F-15E of all things.
So, no. Even using the GPU-5/A would have the Double rack removed if things were at all consistent.
ones interpretation of the language is not my fault, the “ambiguity” you mention comes from a miss understanding of the language itself, not in fact my use of it.
However we aregetting off topic and I’d rather discuss the ridiculousness of the BMPT and such than what I do for a profession.
what’s your thoughts on the BMPT, and teh CAS malarkey going on right now.
Also I would like to add something here, I played several matches last night, and noticed a running trend with the teams, most the time now people will ODL hell even folks leave before the match begins now due to the russian teams.
This factor as well has heavily influenced the spike in win rates of russia right now.
Bruh, they are right beside the engine/transmission.
You think if that fuel tank catches fire it won’t effect the tank at all?
Even if the fuel tank was surrounded by armor it would cook the engine eventually.
Not to mention you can destroy all the fuel tanks and the tank can still move.
But thats a general problem that Gaijin was like: Hey, maybe having fuel isn’t all that important 🙃
Youre correct but thats what external vs internal means in Gaijins modeling. Internal is everything directly in or connected to the crew compartment and external is everything thats somewhat disconnected from it. Its far from good but its mostly consistent.
they only remove vehicles that are not real. tiger 2 105 , panther 2 (the false one the put in rather than the real one) etc etc.
no vehicle is accurate though they are as accurate as they can be without being game breaking.
Recent addition not included in that statement.
because people don’t wan’t that in their game I am all for realism dude but there is a limit to where it goes from a semi simulator to full on sim.
It still is one of the most dominant 10.7 MBTs in game as well at higher BRs. 11.3 IPM1 11.7 M1A1 both amazing.
12.0 you get 4 M1 abrams in the M1A1 HC (upgraded one) the click bait (premium) then the M1A1 HC premium , AND ofc the M1A2 which arguably should be at least 12.3 as better than leopard 2a5
the engine is no where near what was used back then mate, it’s been overhauled and actually rebuilt a few times. One google search would tell you that.
You and I would both like to see older vehicles get rectified.
g91s, Swifts etc for me the cold war jets from the 50s and such are the funnest. But they’re all so dodgy or half assed they become tedious to use.
Or even look at tanks, Chieftain Mk5 in game is a mixture of chieftains.
They do not get the proper ammo
or armours.
the chieftain 900 literally has the correct armour but they wont implement it for the other ones.
The T95E1 technically should be using a T54E2 turret I believe it is, etc etc that era of vehicles is largely forgotten about due to how few people are interested in it now.
Sadly.
so the Mig21 was a pain at release sure but it got patched and it’s effectiveness dropped, meanwhile the likes of the F4E got better.
The F5’s buzzing around as you say as well weren’t that much of a pain though as both phantom and Mig could extend away from them with ease.
the J7E had some flaws though, no all aspects, 60 round gun,.
It’s a fantastic plane but it’s not basically an F-16 at all.
F8E or F8U2 as the u2 was my first plane of those BRs back in the day and it was a ballache for wing rip, you had to manage the speed extremely rightly to make sure it would turn without ripping it’s nuts off.
F4E dogs viggens. They have PD sure and 2 x skyflash, but that’s it.
LET ME CONTINUE THIS WORK
Oh and they just happened to model Russian low tier tanks with external tanks but no other nation?
Almost no tank has internal tanks by that definition because there’s almost certainly some barrier between the fuel and other components.
An exterior tank is outside the hull. Thats it.
If your tank is inside the hull it’s not an exterior tank.
I don’t know what to tell you man, Gaijin just considers every fuel tank that’s not directly in contact with the crew as external.
NO, this is not CCs problem .I have 9 country top team(Includ Russia) .I think the top teams other than Russia are simply rubbish. Most players share the same opinion as me.Maybe you have a different opinion, but you can’t repersent many people .
If you firmly believe in your .Good luck to you
Still haven’t explained why everything Russian is overperforming. Or why they get buffs and NATO gets nerfs. Still waiting for an intelligent response from a Russian soy boy
u cpmpare rare low tier event tanks with bmpt? wich is premium one all players is capable to buy it or the techtree
I have also not really seen much intelligence coming from you, so this is a bit pot calling the kettle black (or whatever the saying is in english).
Found an absolute gem so saying this because this was a stupid arguement.
I don’t understand why people are complaining that Gaijin are following consistent rules in this regard.
Yeah I’m so glad they consistently follow their rules so much that they made an exception for Su-25SM3, Su-30SM/SM2, Su-34, Su-30MKM AND SO MANY OTHERS… Truly amazing…
Truly consistently inconsistent
Nope.
Others were focusing on KDR, which the BMPT has a higher KDR in arcade battles than realistic battles in March.
Number one, that is not accurate to call me “not very good at the game”(I dropped many nukes). Number two, we already had a discussion with no resolve so I am going to respectfully stop talking about the Abrams and calling each other trash. (Hence the reason why statshark can be bad due to toxicity)
In my initial post i list off tons of stuff that isnt realistic…sooo maybe we should learn to read 1st eh?
Which was? The plane corrected itself every so often.
The smart thing was to take both, either 4 x pheonix and 2 sparrows or the reverse, 4 x sparrows and 2 x pheonix.
No Sh** the R24R was absolutely rapid especially if launched at altitude, don’t confuse the 7F burn time for extra speed, it extended the range exponentially though.
Yes the “dogfight” sparrow was better for the closer situations.
Thye added R27ERs cause the mig29 was pretty poor when it dropped.
Sorry what?
R27ERs where better sure than 7F but the 9L absolutely dogged and still dogs on the R60M lol.
No the US had better IR missiles in the Aim9Ls as well as better air frame by miles.
While the 29 had the R27ERs which as well if we remember had to deal with a 100 meter multipath.
we bounced past gen 4 like it was nothing TBH in a matter of what a year or so? more or less.
If it got fixed it would slam like mad lol.
Especially in GRB.
It’s main thing sure, but it also absolutely bet everything in a dogfight as well as had substantially more missiles than most on the field.
Dude dueling is not how it performs in game, I’ve bet Mig29s in F5C you wouldn’t say it’s a better dogfighter.
If you get taken out by an R24T in an F14 it’s your own fault lol.
the mig23 didn’t stomp ont he throat of the phantoms that muhc, F16 and mig29 did.
F14A was an issue for everything.
Nothing i say would change anything, so why bother.
And im not Russian lmao.
