Still explained mostly if not entirely by skilled players.
What does alleged “Russian” team skill have to do with bias though?
Why bring up the skill of “Russian” teams that entirely disproves bias if your point is to not disprove bias?
SPAA cannot be OP. The oppressed are incapable of being OP against oppressors.
Until the MBTs superior to BMPT at 11.3 and 11.7 move up as well, the discussion about BMPT isn’t going to be fruitful.
If BMPT is 11.7: Why would I play BMPT ever in my life? when T-72B3 is superior at 11.3, when Challenger 2s are superior at 11.7, when M1A1 is superior at 11.7, when Merkava Mk3 is superior at 11.3, etc.
If I played BMPT at 11.7, I would be harming my teams ability to win a match by bringing a vehicle worse than MBTs of the same BR.
So the question becomes: Was 12.7 decompression too much when M1A1 is currently a 12.7 tank [Leclerc is its closest equivalent] at 11.7?
I don’t have an answer, I have no take on any of this matter.
What over-performing armor? We have the unclassified documents of T-series armor, and it’s identical to what’s in-game.
Their ERA over performs a bit but not as much as folks tend to make out.
It’s funny but they don’t have even an 80 percent win rate, that numbers been thrown around like mad and the highest htey have is 11.3 which is conviently where the BMPT sits.
They still don’t have the highest win rate at top tier.
It will move up wether you agree or not, there are far too many people doing far too well with it.
It’s statistics do not lie, the win rate on the BMPT and kills are extremely high and thus will likely see it move up in BR.
T72B3 is cheeks TBH alvis, even for 11.3 it’s a crap tank, the BMPT is doing substantially better than it is at the same BR stats wise. Even when there are more people spamming out BMPT / BMPT 72s
Not at all, the fact is every game I’ve played since I came back from my haitus is at 11.7 or aboove.
The BMPT is doing far more lifting per game than any other russian vehicle, even the LMUR and CAS aren’t doing as much for USSR teams as the terminator.
Again hence why the highest win rate in teh game RN is russia at 11.3
You may want to reword this so it’s more coherent.
the BMPT right now can destroy every single 11.7 MBT frontally with ease.
so tell me why the BMPT auto cannon can absolutely annhilate top tier MBTs yet the same cannon mounted on the BMP2 cannot? also the BMPT is firing substantially more rounds than a warrior could ever dream of.
even the APFSDS on the BMP2M seems to be doing worse overall.
The BMPT has proven time and time again it is a completely broken vehicle, it’s stats show that, it’s in game effect show that.
@An_Pigeon
M829A1 penned T-90A’s UFP on Poland a few weeks ago from my tank. Cause K5 isn’t as protective as people think.
Also, no tank has guns in their hulls.
1- Statshark doesn’t have March, so your point is moot.
2- This is February:
I’m sorry but the ERA will literally stop the M829A1 mate, the M1A1 is one of my most used abrams and I can tell you it literally will not go through the UFP without some kind of bug on the ERA,
No it’s not, at all.
Statshark shows that the BMPT is 2nd highest tank at rank 7 for overall kills .
Remember I stated above rank 7 not saying over all in game as there are ofc random tanks from lower BRs used to farm more KD. though it is also the 2nd highest in the game right now for kills.
not kills per death. just kills. as I said, 1.30 KD.
The BMP2M is statistically performing worse
EDIT by pure KD the BMPT is still 6th or 7th in the list, behind a series of event vehicles and ofc things like the sabra mk1 which should not be 10.0
Some of you need to check the definition of bias. It doesn’t mean Russia should stomp everything. It means they get favorable treatment.
Look at the ERA. The main user is Russia and they have the best one. Sure NATO might get lucky once in a blue moon with ERA, but Russia is consistently bs-ing shots. I realized that the truth is, they need this bias, otherwise NATO would lolpen their UFP.
We also have things like the Soyuz. What business does Russia have getting the most powerful battleship? Meanwhile they barely had any capital ships irl.
They always got the best SPAA with the best CAS, the Kh38 being the easiest and most consistent AGM. The Kh is so good i actually use it against multipathing jets in GRB during headons from 20km away.
They also have/had the most oppressive vehicles for the longest time. 2S38, BMP-2 and now BMP-T.
Turret baskets. Seems like only NATO is getting them. Will they add them to Russian MBTs? Probably, but they are taking their sweet time.
Overperforming autocannons. Funny how NATO ones with lower RoF have the same or worse accuracy than the Russian ones with almost triple the firerate.
I’m sure there are a lot more things to say, like the Abrams turret ring armor being 50mm with the bug report accepted 2 and half years ago. But sure, why would USA armor up the center of the Abrams where everyone is shooting during an engagement.
There are also things like Rafale, being a “gotcha” against the bias, but that’s merely a business decision, to make you buy premiums like the F-5 so you can grind for it. Otherwise there would be no point in grinding other nations if they would get stomped nonstop.
I mean it was pretty clear that that would happen. russia in February was at a fairly balanced 50.7% winrate in 12.7. Of course buffing one of the things that they were not super good in would result in a winrate increase when theres no nerfs for them, just for others and no additions for anyone else.
Sweden, China, and Japan all have kinetic-reducing ERA as well.
ERA is not “Russian bias”.
Soyuz is among OP ships. The fact Gneisenau is 7.7 is deeply hilarious.
If it was Russian bias, Gneisenau wouldn’t be OP either.
SPAA is evidence of no Russian bias, bringing it up is admitting it doesn’t exist. A tool to take down oppressive vehicles can never be bias.
All tech trees have SPAA capable of dealing with fixed wing CAS.
And 6 - 7 tech trees have OP helicopters.
Japan has the same Kh-38s as well.
BMP-2M? lol
2S38 was oppressive for the first week before it was increased in BR, then it was stock grind food.
BMPT is the Puma situation.
If it happens in other tech trees, it’s not bias.
Internal modules came to Soviets first, not NATO. Once again, other tech trees; and USSR got nerfed first anyway.
Overperforming? Do you have evidence that ROF is incorrect [overperforming]? If so, go make a historical report.
Abrams is still the 2nd best MBT in the game despite its issues… bringing it up isn’t a gotcha.
F-4J/S has an over-performing radar in-game, yet it hasn’t been fixed since the introduction of HMS.
It’s not American bias, it’s just a situation.
