I’m not gonna bother arguing with you. You already twisted my words. But nice 6 7 joke tho.
(edit for the “offtopic” flag) You misinterpreted my comment about ERA. Your SPAA comment does not have anything to do with what i said. Misinterpreted the turret basket comment. Autocannon reply is entirely different from what i said. Cheers.
@REO_Speedwagon
My post didn’t make any claims of what you said, it only refuted your post.
And your last sentence makes no sense. What is a “6 7 joke”?
Soooo adding the best atgm and correctly adding the LMUR while not doing anything to hellfires/jagms and not giving a counter part to it for any nation is not favorable towards russia? ← this is a retorical question since I know you are defending the bias which means
stop acting daft… we talk about overperfoming strop picking words…
haha no. only 1 and none have the means to couner the mi28
yes the accuracy of its gun vs brads with less fire rate… again you are blind.
noww i see you really are just a player who speak loudly because all you can do being blind and nothing else…
@Fat_Fury
There you go blindly defending Russian vehicles again.
AH-64E is equivalent to Mi-28NM. This is not my take, this is reality.
You can praise and defend Mi-28NM all you want, but it will not change reality.
I’ve never once defended any bias because I don’t believe in bias to begin with. And yes, that would be believe as there’s no evidence.
All evidence showcases other nations.
NATO sources state the capabilities of Relikt and K5.
You are more than welcome to prove NATO wrong.
Accuracy in War Thunder in general is higher for vehicles than real-life, that includes NATO vehicles.
In-fact, one bug report that attempted to increase accuracy for a NATO vehicle, but the source provided proved that the in-game implementation was over-performing and was corrected.
As I said, if people have evidence of over-performing accuracy, that’s what the bug report site is for.
Every example provided of “Russian favoritism” involves other nations getting those vehicles/weapons.
You know how many American bias topics there are on the English forum? None.
Despite American tanks being lower BRs than other tech tree’s counterparts.
Despite American aircraft being lower BRs than other tech trees’ counterparts.
USA had a round better than 3BM60: M829A1, and USA got M829A2 anyway.
USA has had OP CAS since 2022, and kept getting power-creep CAS until American CAS was finally countered in March & June 2025.
USSR had OP CAS since 2024, and got counters in March & June 2025.
USSR get’s a Puma moment, I demand it be moved up to at least 11.3 due to cross-analysis with IS-4M-KV-122, M4A3E2-M4A1, etc and people scream Russian bias when the answer was Gaijin lacked knowledge.
None of those are my takes, none of them. That’s just talking about the history of War Thunder.
Now my take? American bias doesn’t exist, Russian bias doesn’t exist.
War Thunder is 10,000+ moving parts and mistakes will occur.
Missing information will lead to errors.
And it is up to us to point out errors they miss.
Such as F-4J having a PD HDN search mode bug when its radar is supposed to be incapable of it.
Such as when BMPT is brought in at 10.3.
Such as when P51H5NA is 6.3 while Spitfire F Mk24 is 6.7.
Such as when Puma is brought in at 8.3
Such as when EBR is brought in at 4.3 [it’s now 7.0], when AMX-13 was 6.7 at the time.
And so forth.
Also do you guys remember when Gaijin introduced new Pantsir some people claimed that its not gonna be super good because it’s SACLOS? Seems like Hypersonic/anti munition missiles does not concern themselves with those empty claims lmao.
Bmpt player psyche got crushed by immense f14 aura and they commited self destruction ritual by feeding themselves to eldricht horror of wt - tree. Fate worse than death.
and yet you don’t see me going around screaming “x nation bias” or “x nation suffers” just because the nation on the opposite team has been winning basically every match.
The people who use gsb to push their bias propaganda always conveniently ignore what happens in the other mode