Should see what he’s upto on the BMPT thread saying that I said about spikes lol.
Think he needs to take a break .
Think he needs to take a break .
1 Like
top tier USSR is so chopped actual sub 40% WR because of T-80U-E1 spam :sob:
Interesting video.
Even TEC, who is a very neutral guy concerning the bias, now came to the conclusion Russia is just too much advantaged at top tier now (he distinctively employed the word “bias” at the end of the video).
But you can check the video by yourself and make your own opinion about it. I even learnt they also have the bias in naval and coastal. Crazy.
3 Likes
Gotta make it neutral otherwise, they gonna cut your CC benefits :)
1 Like
Being negative about War Thunder doesn’t get you removed from the CC program.
There are CCs that have been negative for years…
1 Like
There are problems and how to phrase them at certain level.
If you live long enough, you would know
1 Like
Yeah.
But again, when the bias is becoming that blatant, cannot really lie to your people anymore.
@SadRIPer
So you’re going to claim EBR, which was far, far more OP than BMPT in its day, was Russian as well?
1 Like
For how long? 1 month before nerf? not to mention that this thing is an event premium tank
Can you differentiate poor balance and deliberate balance?
You only have weak whataboutism in your debate library which only found funny
1 Like
But the EBR has a russian counterpart nowadays, doesn’t it ? What about the best russian SPAAs, the best russian IFVs and tank destroyer (BMPT/72), the best russian CAS, the best russian MBTs and the best russian navals at top tier ? Do they currently have credible NATO counterparts ? No, still waiting (maybe it will never come).
The russian counterpart to the EBR did come very quick, though. How strange.
1 Like
For how long? 1 month before nerf?
Exactly. When it comes to NATO, the nerf or introduction of russian counterpart is very quick.
When it comes to Russia, well… mi28nm, BMPT, SU30s, Pantsirs, you name it… still waiting for the nerf or NATO equivalent.
1 Like
Played a bit of top tier yesterday and every match was vs russian and they get steamrolled every time except for one close match which was normandy lol
The first match after this ss I lost because its the first game ru was on my team. They were so pathetic yesterday something definitely was up
3 Likes
@BabySoEz
BMPT was OP during work hours for a number of days.
EBR was OP during work hours for months.
EBR is also settled at a BR that’s equivalent to BMPT being moved to 13.0, and T-90M is hilariously superior to BMPT. The same cannot be said about M46 being superior to EBR.
You also replied to the wrong user, I’ve never done whataboutism in my life.
Russian equipment defenders got nothing as usual.
All they can do is make up fiction about NATO players.
This is what whataboutism is BTW:
" whataboutism, the rhetorical practice of responding to an accusation or difficult question by making a counteraccusation, by asking a different but related question, or by raising a different issue altogether."
That is the definition of what I’ve never done in my life.
Not whatever personal definition you might use.
Bringing up another relevant example to talk about both situations is explicitly on-topic.
@SadRIPer
Japan has identical CAS to Soviets.
USA and France have “meta” CAS as well [no CAS is meta in War Thunder, not even Sukhois].
Then you have the best of the helicopters which are just Z-10ME, AH-64Es, and Mi-28NM. Shared between 6 or 7 tech trees.
Best ground lineups are USA, Germany, and Sweden.
USSR doesn’t come close, especially when USA’s 12.7 lineup is currently sitting at BR 12.0.
SPAA is good across the board.
IFVs are not anywhere close to match moving at top BR, and tank destroyers even less so because they lack scouting.
Light tanks are okay because anti-tank weapons as well as scouting while autocannons and ATGMs are rather pointless at 12.0 up. Yes, that is without exception.
You got the only 11 games which go against the general trend then.
This is the exception that proves the rule.
Aren’t you using similar sample sizes?
And don’t your global top tier stats show a roughly average winrate for your own French tanks?
2 Likes
Bringing event EBR Dec 2020 to Rusian B*as 2026 is relevant?
Answer please
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
It’s very marginally worse, but still OP.
Just tanks, this is objectively correct. Russian tanks aren’t the best, and thinking they are is outing yourself as a bad player.
This is also true, but certain SPAA are still the best. I highly doubt there is a single bad AA at top tier.
1 Like
Aren’t you using similar sample sizes?
I definetely did not show only 10 games though lol (at solely 1 BR in addition of that).
And don’t your global top tier stats show a roughly average winrate for your own French tanks?
Already explained it. When I teamed up alongwith Russia, killing the NATO opponents is easy (it thus pumps my french tanks winrates). When I’m against Russia, the winrates plummet.
It’s very marginally worse, but still OP.
Since when Japan has the Mi28NM ?
“Same CAS” lol. A lot more worse you meant.
Just tanks, this is objectively correct. Russian tanks aren’t the best, and thinking they are is outing yourself as a bad player.
Just watch TEC’s video I posted earlier, and you’ll understand why the russian ones are better.
The answer is artificial/shadow buffing. In the video, he’s not even talking about how russian ERAs/side armors in general eat DARTs, russian autoloaders eat DARTs, russian top tier MBT has HE + proxy HE + atgm shells + IRST while several NATO vehicles just don’t, russian top tier MBTs pratically reach NATO top tiers MBTs speed midfight… and a lot more.
This is also true, but certain SPAA are still the best. I highly doubt there is a single bad AA at top tier.
What about the elephant in the room ? Pantsirs 1 and 2 being the best of top top tier ? 2S6 + Strela for short range at top tier too ?