exactly, therefore saying the statement above does not make sense.
Thats crazy.
exactly, therefore saying the statement above does not make sense.
Thats crazy.
Except rate of fire with an autocannon is directly related to the lethality of the weapon system. There is a reason why the trashmaster is called such, while the pen is better on paper, it has less than half the ROF of the BMPT/BMP2M. So even if you take away all the other stuff the BMPT gets, it still has greatly increased offensive capabilities in comparison to the 9.0-9.7 tanks you claim it’s equivalent to.
Yes, the BMPT only fires 1 cannon at a time but having 2 not only gives redundance, increasing ability to continue to lay down fire during engagements, but it also gives you the option to have a separate ammo selected to broaden engagement variety.
Sure, it’s a skill thing if you’re engaging that BMPT on flat ground with a nice perfect view at it. While it’s sitting hull down? Good luck. While it’s rushing around a corner? Better hope that first shot connects.
You also have 9 games in the 2E and a little over a 150 games in all 3 of the Chally 2s combined with less than 200 kills total.
You say what OP? what is balance? current state?
I’m sure you, there are some of your friendly names here really like to do that.
Huh?
That’s the problem Gaijin favors russians when it comes to being realistic. Gaijin adds the turret baskets for all nato mbts which disable the horizontal drive 0 logic. At the same time Gaijin doesnt want to make the ammo belt if you hit it on the BMPT explode the whole thing. Which it does for several others with tanks with the same setup.
I will say im glad Gaijin modeled the autoloader but Gaijin doesnt make it disable the horizontal drive.
Not anymore, it got renamed.
“Tube-Launched, Optically Tracked, Wireless Guided (TOW) Missiles”
" The gunner defines the aim point by maintaining the sight crosshairs on the target. The launcher automatically steers the missile along the line-of-sight toward the aim point via a one-way radio frequency (RF) link, which links the launcher and missile."
““TOW missiles are employed on the — Bradley Fighting Vehicles variants (A2/A2ODS/A2OIF/A3)””
“The TOW 2B Aero RF is the most modern and capable missile in the TOW family, with an extended maximum range to 4,500 meters. The TOW 2B Aero RF defeats all threat armor systems. The TOW 2B Aero Gen2 also incorporates an advanced counteractive protection system capability.”
good to know
its still saclos right?
Sort of, there were/was F&F TOW variant(s) that reached prototyping

but of more interest would be various replacements to the TOW launcher for the Bradley.
This is something I would love to see in the US tech tree after the M3A3. This and the XM30 whenever there is enough public info for it to be added.
I just saw this now.
So when you post screenshots of your 20-30 games with a supposedly 20-30% NATO winrate it’s the holy grail of proof and absolute truth, but when I post 40 games in my Ariete it’s suddenly dishonest?
You know what? I’m not even suprised, this is typical for people like you.
I don’t think this count as statshaming. Also sometimes using stats is just a means to point out that a persons pov stems from their own skill issue.
(Besides that, good luck to a player like SadRIPer to statshame me, I’d love to see him try).
Not sure about the top but I thought the bottom was a bradley launched drone interceptor type thing?
It’s known as the Coyote LE-SR (TOW), it has a modular payload, and mission set that includes precision strike (and for this variant omits the C-UAS role), It’s basically just an even larger, vehicle borne Switchblade 600.
It obviously shares a linage with the other Coyote developments
Broken vehicle.
I played 1 10.7 game, got flooded by swarms of BMPTs, left.
Played 1 9.7 game, got a nuke with AMX-30 S DCA solely lmao
Top tier got ruined by this thing.
I’m currently being relieved only playing 9.7. It feels so refreshing, you actually have a chance to win lmao
Thanks for showing that. I’ll keep saying it in this thread :
At top tier, [u]Russia plays in tutorial mode/u] (ez wins, no sweat, majority of wins among the games)
I actually think I never had 7 wins in a row at this BR, since the BMPT got released. Top tier got broken.
Should see what he’s upto on the BMPT thread saying that I said about spikes lol.
top tier USSR is so chopped actual sub 40% WR because of T-80U-E1 spam :sob:
Interesting video.
Even TEC, who is a very neutral guy concerning the bias, now came to the conclusion Russia is just too much advantaged at top tier now (he distinctively employed the word “bias” at the end of the video).
But you can check the video by yourself and make your own opinion about it. I even learnt they also have the bias in naval and coastal. Crazy.