well duh it actually has an armor value (which SHOULD be conveyed in the armor viewer but i digress)
it also only eats secondary spalling
That armor value isn’t enough to stop spalling, let alone getting you survive from direct shots.
In fact that tiny armor should cause additional spalling in this case.
1 Like
This one isn’t true, but I can see how it feels like that.
LOS protection of Leclerc’s UFP should be ~500 according to the x-ray, but it took years for Arietes to get their updated composite array.
Time will tell how long it’ll take.
We only “started” getting non-structural trunnions on tanks as well.
This.
And he’s gazlighting me on top of that, lying in his posts lmao.
Shame.
Problem on Ariete lies with WAR KIT.
Its suppose to make turret cheeks immune to 3BM60 at point blank but they still hasn’t fixed that, as for other protection aspects i highly doubt Ariete can receive more protection in those areas.
1 Like
The spall made front shooting the breech will 100% hit any ammunition positionned in any way in the nato autoloader.
What are you on about ?
this
gun trunions are absolute cancer to the point that ive stopped going for breech shots on mbts at all
ERA is also cancerous in a different way, the way they clutter up the DM is really nasty
like how is this possible lmao, its a tandem atgm lmao
i dont think it even does stop the main spalling cone
looking at my shot replays it only stops the wider secondary cone
ussr_t_72b_105mm_m774_204.8.blk (3.7 KB)
ussr_t_80b_105mm_m774_114.88.blk (2.5 KB)
1 Like
More like he’s doing selective realism in this case. (which i dont approve anyway).
1 Like
Gaijin doesn’t even know how to model modules.
Tandem’s are bugged at this moment so im not surprised.
Its completely random tbh, sometimes it doesn’t do shit other times it basically soaks entire spalling/damage.
When the tank has nothing to back up an easily exploited weakspot, then it’s overtiered.
Ok so Leclercs and Arietes are overtiered ?
Because the devs are stupid when it comes to properly balancing things.
Glad you’re admitting some NATO stuff are actually overtiered at top tier, thus giving Russia an advantage (aka a bias ?)
This.
Leclercs, Arietes, Merkavas, Challengers have nothing to do at 12.7.
am i?
leclercbreech.blk (713 Bytes)
what im seeing is the blast door stopping the spalling and the round hitting a single shell in the autoloader
Yes.
But those artificial buff are there, so now it makes them totally op against NATO.
And it’s unbalanced.
No, it’s called balance.
99% of players play realstic battles and not even sim battles are a “sim” they just force you into first person and thats it.
It doesn’t have an armor value, it acts like an actual spall liner. Which is completely BS.
Do NATO autoloaders act like that, like a very heavy armor capable of tanking every spalls they meet ? No.
Exactly.
it does
but i dont know what value it is since the photomode hides the hud
inside of a leclerc autoloader
1 Like
Cope
Trying to find every possible excuse to justify Russia being artificially/shadow buffed lmao.
1 Like
Now you say the rounds don’t matter?
Make up your mind.
optics are not thermals, thermals are thermals HSTVL has far better optics than the 2S38 aka zoom magnification.
yes literally it survives more shots than the 2S38 the 2S38 at addition had broken fuel tanks.
Now it has bigger amo as well as it has all teh crew in teh front.
It’s a 1 tap kill almost always.
I’m sorry what? you are saying Lmurs have lofitng and it’s an advantage but Jags it’s a nerf?
Like I’ve seen both these weapon systems rinse entire lobbies as if it was nothing.
They really do when the DM53 out of the l/55 has nearly 100 more pen lol, it’s a huge difference.
I’m sorry but we’ve got NATO kit which is modern as well lol, the 2A7 being an example of that, the M1A2 SEP V2 is not from the 80s either it’s from 2008.
All the SPAAs are modern bar the older models.
what do you want exactly a USA “I win button”
i literaly just told you another example of a tank with stuff added due to brochures xD
the leclerc reload being 5 secondscomes from brochures, hell one source is a tank building magazine.
what slang would that be?
In English the term “Ruskie” is derogatory towards them and since about the 1960 has been used as an insult, and an insult alone.
While it comes from a translation it’s still an insult.
just because you do not consider it “abusive” doesn’t mean it’s not derogatory lol
The hellfires I use at 10.7 seem to do pretty damn well, the hellfires will take altitude to come down at more of an angle, as long as you’re not hurling it at like 2,4km
Because they argued it cannot be implemented without the LOAL as well as the capabilities of tracking through smoke.
Cause lets say an EF2000 with almost what x 18 FNF missiles would be a bit stupidely OP no? xD
Though I have spoken in great detail about how that could be fixed.
What do you mean the smae RNG to the russians, the Spikes it isn’t RNG how it hits. It’s just a lesser angle, that is it.
RNG is more like ammo cook off, angle of pen etc.
I’ve played for over half a decade, almost every year there’s 3 or 4 things drop at once making a random nation OP as hell.
Also stop calling them Russkies you mug.
How can you not understand that the Nato heavies are more well armoured when it comes to te likes of the conq, M103, T32E1 etc xD
2 Likes
winrates are influenced by more than just me.
That is why statistically I dumpster you in most of the MBTs we have both played.
Oh no a couple of nukes, the skill level.
I get nukes regularly enough that I often just let them sit there to farm more RP and SL, only spawning them last minute for the one minute to midnight SL rewards.
That 1.6 K/D in your KVT is really cure though.