Russian Bias in 2026?

When the tank has nothing to back up an easily exploited weakspot, then it’s overtiered. Thinking the IS-2s aren’t overtiered is a genuinely abysmal take, and just by looking at them you can see that the Tiger IIs, T26E5, or T34 (US) are better.

Because the devs are stupid when it comes to properly balancing things.

And they have a higher BR. Even then, the T58 is the most OP out of all heavy tanks, and most American heavies are fairly competitive and good for their BRs. Theres also the fact that Russian heavies have awfully long reloads and are lacking in pen a lot of the time.

This.

The russian autoloaders are artificially buffed, as much as every other russian stuff in that mater.

But I coupled his 20 games with my hundreds, which basically showed the same results ???

So it’s hundreds + 20 ?

Worse ammo? Are you talking about the VCC-80/60?
But that has same generation thermals.
There is no tank with a better round and better thermals than HSTVL.
There are tanks with worse ammo and better thermals, but not your post’s specific stipulation.

HSTVL is the best autocannon light tank in the game for a reason; and part of that reason is because it was too expensive to produce IRL.

Soviets having a KE-W equivalent round doesn’t mean much when USA also has M829A1 and M829A2.

Then don’t spawn CAS and focus on winning.

Tied with Japan, and spawn SPAA.
Still haven’t seen anyone post documentation or video of LMURs functioning IRL to compare it to War Thunder. All I’ve read is conjecture that LMURs are somehow correct.

The fact your post implies the HSTVL I shilled for is Russian as well, deeply hilarious.
Me: Shills for HSTVL and USA.
Not sure how you get HSTVL and USA mixed up with Russia to be honest.
There’s a reason I have zero posts anywhere online or paper “shilling Russians”, cause I never have.

No.

They are stupid because they are deliberately refusing to fix those tanks armor alongside with other features.

If Leclerc was historical it could be a real candidate at 12.7, as for the Ariete’s they could be easily 12.3 with proper modelling.

2 Likes

Do I need to remind you 70% of your vehicles giving you winrates >= 60% are Leos and T-series ? I can post the maths discuted in pm here if you want. You’re nowhere near as good with other MBTs, which are not the META, lol.

Also, I got couple of nukes in the kvt, so I’m good thanks

  • I’m glad you’re admitting spike IFVs are completely garbage and ineffective.

I’d say in this case its not something special to Russians.

Any tank that has autoloader also benefits from this, i survived countless time in my Leclerc’s, Type-90/10’s and with other tanks that has autoloaders because of this feature.

Problem lies with gun trunnion, overperforming base/ERA armor on Russian tanks but then again if you take away those artificial buffs they become complete trash at top tier.

1 Like

well duh it actually has an armor value (which SHOULD be conveyed in the armor viewer but i digress)
it also only eats secondary spalling

That armor value isn’t enough to stop spalling, let alone getting you survive from direct shots.

In fact that tiny armor should cause additional spalling in this case.

1 Like

This one isn’t true, but I can see how it feels like that.
LOS protection of Leclerc’s UFP should be ~500 according to the x-ray, but it took years for Arietes to get their updated composite array.
Time will tell how long it’ll take.
We only “started” getting non-structural trunnions on tanks as well.

This.

And he’s gazlighting me on top of that, lying in his posts lmao.

Shame.

Problem on Ariete lies with WAR KIT.

Its suppose to make turret cheeks immune to 3BM60 at point blank but they still hasn’t fixed that, as for other protection aspects i highly doubt Ariete can receive more protection in those areas.

1 Like

The spall made front shooting the breech will 100% hit any ammunition positionned in any way in the nato autoloader.

What are you on about ?

this
gun trunions are absolute cancer to the point that ive stopped going for breech shots on mbts at all
ERA is also cancerous in a different way, the way they clutter up the DM is really nasty


like how is this possible lmao, its a tandem atgm lmao

i dont think it even does stop the main spalling cone
looking at my shot replays it only stops the wider secondary cone
ussr_t_72b_105mm_m774_204.8.blk (3.7 KB)
ussr_t_80b_105mm_m774_114.88.blk (2.5 KB)

1 Like

More like he’s doing selective realism in this case. (which i dont approve anyway).

1 Like

Gaijin doesn’t even know how to model modules.

Tandem’s are bugged at this moment so im not surprised.

Its completely random tbh, sometimes it doesn’t do shit other times it basically soaks entire spalling/damage.

When the tank has nothing to back up an easily exploited weakspot, then it’s overtiered.

Ok so Leclercs and Arietes are overtiered ?

Because the devs are stupid when it comes to properly balancing things.

Glad you’re admitting some NATO stuff are actually overtiered at top tier, thus giving Russia an advantage (aka a bias ?)

This.

Leclercs, Arietes, Merkavas, Challengers have nothing to do at 12.7.

am i?
leclercbreech.blk (713 Bytes)
what im seeing is the blast door stopping the spalling and the round hitting a single shell in the autoloader

Yes.

But those artificial buff are there, so now it makes them totally op against NATO.

And it’s unbalanced.