i actually agree with you on that, spalling should be massively buffed from penning internal components
1 Like
As I stated before, it’s only 60 games, it’s statistically irrelevant.
Don’t worry, he’ll play 500 more games with the kf41, and the winrate will remain the same lmao. Because spikes are completely broken.
its only 20 games and youve used this guys post as holy gospel
3 Likes
Or maybe it’s because the centauro is fully stock (agreed on the KF41 though).
Do I need to remind you that I do better in the worst 11.7 MBT in game at 12.7 than you do in one of the best 10.7 MBTs at it’s own BR?
1 Like
is this too little? i play russian tanks with that load
also t64 has a different ammo layout to t72 just keep that in mind
but they themselves are not the ones causing the whole space program
I can ask the same question about the kh-38mt …
It has dual mode seeker laser and mmw radar
But for sake of balancing thisng they could give it an ir seeker if they consider mmw to be op… but somehow they don’t want to because if would shift the balance more to the middle wich is not good considered we see the russian favoritism.
1 Like
49 games man, what are you on about ? Of course you’re gonna have extreme winrates, near 0% or 100%. Play more with it.
I’m only talking about heavy vs heavy only. The T32 stands no chance compared to russian heavies.
i dont even need to show you that since you yourself know those two are frontally immune to its APHE
So you’re admitting T32 cannot do a single thing against those biased vehicle, while the russian side can obliterate the T32 ?
Do you understand there is a lack of balance, disadvantaging NATO ?
Do you understand the only heavy russian weakspots are tiny driver sights + tiny cupolas, compared to massive NATO weakspots ?
well the IS tanks and do anything if they are propped up by a time curb so i think that balances them out
yeah right massive t32 weakspots mhm
1 Like
I can change the ammo layout after taking that photo buddy, its not hard to do that you know.
You’re telling me? XD
As you can see i only took 5 shells and got the exact same results on your photo, its not so hard to play with your ammo count before taking those shots buddy.
It doesn’t take space engineering knowledge to understand that op meant the whole system in this case.
1 Like
You shoot right you shoot left you shoot center, the autoloader will explode.
then take 16? whats the problem if you can test this yourself?
different angle to see where the ammo really is
actually no, it will explode if you hit the ammo (and rng doesnt screw you up)
No, the problem is that it is the autoloader that eats the spalls. Thus, if only the back of the autoloader is filled, and that you shot the front of it, the ammo won’t explode. Which is completely BS.
And of course, the definition of a russian bias (artificially buffing).
When the tank has nothing to back up an easily exploited weakspot, then it’s overtiered. Thinking the IS-2s aren’t overtiered is a genuinely abysmal take, and just by looking at them you can see that the Tiger IIs, T26E5, or T34 (US) are better.
Because the devs are stupid when it comes to properly balancing things.
And they have a higher BR. Even then, the T58 is the most OP out of all heavy tanks, and most American heavies are fairly competitive and good for their BRs. Theres also the fact that Russian heavies have awfully long reloads and are lacking in pen a lot of the time.
This.
The russian autoloaders are artificially buffed, as much as every other russian stuff in that mater.
But I coupled his 20 games with my hundreds, which basically showed the same results ???
So it’s hundreds + 20 ?
Worse ammo? Are you talking about the VCC-80/60?
But that has same generation thermals.
There is no tank with a better round and better thermals than HSTVL.
There are tanks with worse ammo and better thermals, but not your post’s specific stipulation.
HSTVL is the best autocannon light tank in the game for a reason; and part of that reason is because it was too expensive to produce IRL.
Soviets having a KE-W equivalent round doesn’t mean much when USA also has M829A1 and M829A2.
Then don’t spawn CAS and focus on winning.
Tied with Japan, and spawn SPAA.
Still haven’t seen anyone post documentation or video of LMURs functioning IRL to compare it to War Thunder. All I’ve read is conjecture that LMURs are somehow correct.
The fact your post implies the HSTVL I shilled for is Russian as well, deeply hilarious.
Me: Shills for HSTVL and USA.
Not sure how you get HSTVL and USA mixed up with Russia to be honest.
There’s a reason I have zero posts anywhere online or paper “shilling Russians”, cause I never have.
No.
They are stupid because they are deliberately refusing to fix those tanks armor alongside with other features.
If Leclerc was historical it could be a real candidate at 12.7, as for the Ariete’s they could be easily 12.3 with proper modelling.
2 Likes
Do I need to remind you 70% of your vehicles giving you winrates >= 60% are Leos and T-series ? I can post the maths discuted in pm here if you want. You’re nowhere near as good with other MBTs, which are not the META, lol.
Also, I got couple of nukes in the kvt, so I’m good thanks
- I’m glad you’re admitting spike IFVs are completely garbage and ineffective.
I’d say in this case its not something special to Russians.
Any tank that has autoloader also benefits from this, i survived countless time in my Leclerc’s, Type-90/10’s and with other tanks that has autoloaders because of this feature.
Problem lies with gun trunnion, overperforming base/ERA armor on Russian tanks but then again if you take away those artificial buffs they become complete trash at top tier.
1 Like