Russian Bias in 2026?

it is in fact, a TOW lol wether you agree or not.

Yes and each and everyone has had moments where it was smashing.
Bar maybe italy.

Type 90s got to sit under BR’d for ages conveintly when a premium one had dropped
France , well a plethora of auto loading highly mobile mediums which slap AMX30 Super which arguably could goto germany.

Britain absolutely ruined the game for a whilewhen the centurions were added.
Arguably the best 10.7 lineup in the game for Tanks, cas and SPAA combo.

you realise that the auto loader isn’t what blows up, but teh shell in it?
If he takes like I do 16 shells the majority of the thing is empty.
Bit like how in a nato tank it is also empty.

You dyin to a T64B in an abrams is hilarious, like why are you sat there, why not push the forward hill so he can’t aim down as far?

the game has always been a semi - realistic game never has it claimed to be full on hyper realistic.

That attitude just shows you know nothing of the game.

CR2s the BN and the 2E are actually pretty decent, the other 3 are at a lower BR.
The ariete’s are sad but none are 12.7 and likely will slowly slide down in BR as BRs increase.
the Leclercs are some of the highest KD MBTs in game, and in my own experience with them, Solid ass tanks to use.

**in what world should any leclerc be 12.0? ??? the lowest the S1 and S2 could be is 12.3 lol.

What Leclerc equivelant is at 12.0?
the T72B3A arena with a crap APS is at 12.3 and is worse in almost every way bar the reound adn armour.

scuse me what? the leclrcs have great mobility. good optics, good thermals, good reload, consitently 5 seconds Which as I said @Ralin has sources directly from the manufactor stating that it should be 6
So it’s over buffed.

Arietes aren’t great armour wise ,still got LWS; gen 2 thermals commander and gunner, good mobility and DM53 at 11.7.

Doesn’t matter, it’s in 2 different trees.

What ? the 6.7 US and German heavies mug the IS2 off lol.

  • USA .At 6.7 you’ve got the
  • T26E1-1 which with the long 90 wipes IS2, for half the reload time.
  • T26E1 which has mobility and armour over the IS2 as well as reload rate.
  • T34 heavy which need I say more?

Germany has at 6.7

  • Tiger 2 (p) or now known as the NR150
  • Tiger 2 modern turret
  • Tiger 2 Sla.16 all of which makeIS2 look pathetic.

That does not include any TDs , mediums or SPG in that list.

Yes volumetric with an off shot will make stuff like DM53 bounce off a leopard 2a4 hull

And when they do, and disagree with you, you’ll call them russian mains and cry.

the clips in the post are poor shots for the most part, and others into volumetric hell.

Compared to the aformentoined heavies I just said.

The reddit is the place to go for it.

But Straight up you and I have never said in a situation where we disagree and I’ve thought, he’s baiting lol.

Type 90 slides into the backround again as if it didn’t destroy 10.3 for months.
Same as the Type 74 armour is wildly unpredictable lol.

Will u really x

HSTVL

  • better round
  • better mobility
  • better optics
  • better armour / survivability
  • better profile.
  • less situational.

it quite literally has better ammo what on christs earth are you on about?

  • HSTVL

Screenshot 2026-03-30 175659

  • 2S38 has lower pen and spalling.
    Screenshot 2026-03-30 175714

Well the type 90 sat at 11.3 for 6 months nearly , destroyed the entire bracket.

  • T58 sat there for almost a full pathc so 3 months and still is potent.
  • turm 3 never been patched.
  • Puma took them motnhs to get it where it should be.
  • the 2A7 had initial nerfs but is still the top dog for MBTs in teh game.

shall I continue? it took them time, they do little by little.
Do I agree with the methodology? no.
Do I absolutely acknowledge when changes are made? ofc I do .

so again, you’re talking about how Jags and such don’t loft enough when Lmurs do, they still loft.
Also hellfires at their BR of aroudn 10.7 are solid as hell missiles.

3BM60 is the most middling round in the game, it quite literally isn’t a good round.

3BM60 also does not have 600+ pen

It has about 570 something.
So no they have no where near comparable rounds.

I’ve never seen a tank with it’s auto laoder broken reload when it should not.
They also still have 7 second reloads on the T72 series MBT, as well as 6.4 on the T80 BVM,

so T80BVM reloads nearly 1.1 seconds slower than all my nato MBT at top tier bar the Leopards as they aren’t experted yet.
T-90M reloads almost a full 2 seconds slower than most nato MBTs.

What are you on about.

Video evidence has never been accepted for any nation.

the current reload on the leclerc is literally from brochures and is faster than IRL
The KH38MT i’ve stated and won’t state again, shouldbe removed. That’s undeniable as we do not have sufficient sources to add it.

However, if you would like to go down that road then most platforms in game would need overhauls and changes.

Okay mate you again are begining to completely ignore anything else I am saying

Videos are not used as sources as they are highly susceptible to editing

This has been gaijins standpoint since day one , irregardless of the source of the video.

The brochures are used as secondary sources. Which is something which has always been done, hence the reload on leclerc.

Bad compared to LMUR
Okay great, the Spike is still a decent missile in game?

  • 1 using terms like “russkie” is derogatory and I won’t accept that being used due to you having some form of xenophobia, or racism against them.

  • 2 I’m a british main first and foremost followed closely by USA then china etc.

  • 3 I’ve 9 out of 10 trees in game at 11.7 over the span of four thousand hours, I really do not main a single one but have the most games in USA , just over 1000 between my 10.7 - 12.7 abrams.

Hellfires will literally take altitude id fired at the correct ranges then come down at an angle.

the best lights? no the best light in game is the HSTVL for 12.0 then followed by I believe one of the CVs, the russians have the strongest IFVs which are then followed by the likes of the freccia and such.

No argument there.

No one is arguing their cas is strong, we’re arguing their MBTs are no where near as good as folks make out.

most of them are on the US lol no, the USAs weapons actually have some if not most their functionalities.

More meaning stuff like brimstone, or the italian missiles not working right at all.
Or as brimstone is missing most their proper functions.

WEll away of what they should get, but don’t.

You can get through it mate, i’ve manged with a JH7A you can with the 3 jets listed.
not easily but you can.

it’ll likely get more changes coming.

No wonder mate it was rolling around picking apart 7.3 tanks lol

I am well aware on how a spikes should hit
I’m also well aware of the absolute mess it would make of the game.

i am being dead serious, what the hell are you even asking of me?

Thank you for showing all of this man. You’re great

Compare T32 shell against IS3 IS4M T10M Object 268, and then the opposite.

You’ll see the unbalance between the 2 nations, in terms of heavy armor.

It’s straight russian bias.

The lineup I play is 2A7HU, prem ariete, SAMP/T and Otomatic (about 70k RP away from the centauro 2).

Spoiler

Oh yeah all of the 10 battles in my hungarian 2A4 have also been at 11.0-12.7 lol.

Now I’ll go walk my dogs and after that I’ll go sorting through replays.

1 Like

You write too much, I can’t respond to all of that + the clip where the t64 autoloader didnt explode was from @pooqich , the dude who claims there is no russian bias, but still was a victim of the said bias.

Anyway.



you cant see behind my gay little bushes but the drivers port is an OHK
image
268 has an unhidable OFF button near its gun so its not even closely a problem
is4m is the only one that is hard to pen frontally but it has geriatric gun handling so youll get by

1 Like

T32 shell vs IS3 IS4M T10M VS the opposite, simple

Got 9 nukes lately, using only 1 vehicle, most of the time only a sad vbci/m901, not even a mbt. So I’m good, thanks man

believe it or not… but autoloaders dont actually explode
and i didnt hit the ammo due to the angle the shot was fired from


btw this is how the ammo is laid out when you dont take the full load, there was no way for me to even hit it

Would you look at that, 69% winrate with the 2a7, then 48 and 40 with the kf41 and centauro (because they are garbage and actually not Leos, lol)

Without Leos and T-series, your winrate is under 60%, I already explained it and demonstrated it to u in pm.

Rounds don’t matter that much since you need to aim for same weakspots…
mobility true
optis better? did you read about thermals and what they have?
surivability? seriously?

2s38 ammo count makes this thing a massive buff…

ugh that loft makes them a lot of the time miss oor drop out of energy or not kill a tank which should be blown to pieces… that also makes jagms which you have 16 to not kill as much as 8 lmurs…

I said ~600 pen which means less or more don’t care those 50 mms dont make any difference in game.

THEN WHY THE F… WE HAVE TOP TIER MESSES UP WITH NEWEST RUSSIAN VEHICLES/MISSILES/PLANES WHILE WE GET 80’S USA EQUIPPMENT? FRANCE ETC?

Why the bruchure info about adding something is only implemented in russians while

this is how we call them in my language and is not considered abusive. We have real other slang to call them in which is offensive but not russkie …

so which one is it? we see that it should go from top down in multiple real life videos … they have 2 types of fnf flat and loft… gues which one is more deadly for vehicles but is notin game because of reasons?

but why? why gaijin does not want them to have it? all roads go to rome and same applies here…

So why not give the same RNG element to the russians?

come on dude with some I agree with you it took longer for them to move puma but for gods sake when it comes to russkies there is too much speaking of them favoring it… too many “coincidences” of that …

1 Like

how convenient of you to completely disregard the ariete winrate

1 Like

Showing what exactly? no one is questioning how the damn spikes work IRL lol.

Also most his other points were completely wrong.
3bm60 600+ pen shell, lie
HSTVL ammo worse than the 2S38 ? lie

The T32E1 is better than the IS4M, IS3 and object 268 lol.
The T10M is nearly a full BR above those tanks

can still die exactly the same way a T10A does.
But ahs to fight the likes of Shot kal dalets etc which ahve thermals, darts, LRFs, fully stabilised as well as reload in half the time.

T10M is no where near russian bias xD the thing is nearly the same BR as a chieftain.

Again literally proving you will not read something which proves you wrong. Which is quite funny as that reply I responded to 4 different people, so not every piece of information is for you. You’re not the center of attention.

I’d stop mate he’s completely ignoring what I said again.

You do understand it’s green everywhere compared to russian IS3/IS4M/T10M ?

Do you understand stalinium is way more protected than their NATO counterpart, and that it is an actual balance problem for NATO ?

Show the T32 shell against IS4M and T10M, cmon man. So everybody can see T32 stands literally no chance against those in battles lol.

rafale/ef2000/basically every top tier vehicle/missile is basically paperwaffe made manifest from brochures

2 Likes

its clearly not a problem for me


image
and it doesnt really cause any problems for anyone since heat is quite abundant at that br

i dont even need to show you that since you yourself know those two are frontally immune to its APHE
actually no, t10 is penned the same way is3 is + it has a raised roof which you can scrape to kill

Yes that is true but now We can all agree the Ir version of the mach 2 missile the kh-38mt is overpowered in some ways… (let’s forget the new pantsir is here)

We have brimmstones much slower but more in quantity missiles on EF-2000

Why not for the sake of at leat smaller balance give the brimmstones Ir seekers instead of mmw (they said they would be OP) ?

Why not? since the bruchures are there?

now imagine you have so many fnf missiles on a plane then the new pantsir (bring back we have it now) would be overwhelmed and easier to kill this would shift the power to the middle instead then to the russian tech tree

1 Like

Conveniently, russian autoloader is pratically empty if u take less than 16 shells, while NATO autoloader has no way the possibility not to expload, even if you only take 5 shells.

Do you understand the autoloader should expload, regardless the amount of shell you take ? We’re talking about a shell shot creating huge spalls everywhere in the tank.

With Russia, it’s a pixel hunting problem regarding the spall created after a shot to the LFP. With NATO → you shoot the breech anywhere, the autoloader exploads anyway.

Again, do you understand how unbalanced this is ??

It shouldnt be like that. You shoot the autoloader, spalls are created and hit everything, everything exploads. No bs where the spalls actual hit the front/back/left/right of the autoloader which happened to be empty, so it’s ok no explosion. Wtf.

indeed fuck that thing
i was one of the guys arguing for its deletion back when its main thread was up

does it have an IR seeker irl?

this is simply not true