You do understand it’s green everywhere compared to russian IS3/IS4M/T10M ?
Do you understand stalinium is way more protected than their NATO counterpart, and that it is an actual balance problem for NATO ?
Show the T32 shell against IS4M and T10M, cmon man. So everybody can see T32 stands literally no chance against those in battles lol.
rafale/ef2000/basically every top tier vehicle/missile is basically paperwaffe made manifest from brochures
its clearly not a problem for me
i dont even need to show you that since you yourself know those two are frontally immune to its APHE
actually no, t10 is penned the same way is3 is + it has a raised roof which you can scrape to kill
Yes that is true but now We can all agree the Ir version of the mach 2 missile the kh-38mt is overpowered in some ways… (let’s forget the new pantsir is here)
We have brimmstones much slower but more in quantity missiles on EF-2000
Why not for the sake of at leat smaller balance give the brimmstones Ir seekers instead of mmw (they said they would be OP) ?
Why not? since the bruchures are there?
now imagine you have so many fnf missiles on a plane then the new pantsir (bring back we have it now) would be overwhelmed and easier to kill this would shift the power to the middle instead then to the russian tech tree
Conveniently, russian autoloader is pratically empty if u take less than 16 shells, while NATO autoloader has no way the possibility not to expload, even if you only take 5 shells.
Do you understand the autoloader should expload, regardless the amount of shell you take ? We’re talking about a shell shot creating huge spalls everywhere in the tank.
With Russia, it’s a pixel hunting problem regarding the spall created after a shot to the LFP. With NATO → you shoot the breech anywhere, the autoloader exploads anyway.
Again, do you understand how unbalanced this is ??
It shouldnt be like that. You shoot the autoloader, spalls are created and hit everything, everything exploads. No bs where the spalls actual hit the front/back/left/right of the autoloader which happened to be empty, so it’s ok no explosion. Wtf.
indeed fuck that thing
i was one of the guys arguing for its deletion back when its main thread was up
does it have an IR seeker irl?
this is simply not true
i actually agree with you on that, spalling should be massively buffed from penning internal components
As I stated before, it’s only 60 games, it’s statistically irrelevant.
Don’t worry, he’ll play 500 more games with the kf41, and the winrate will remain the same lmao. Because spikes are completely broken.
its only 20 games and youve used this guys post as holy gospel
Or maybe it’s because the centauro is fully stock (agreed on the KF41 though).
Do I need to remind you that I do better in the worst 11.7 MBT in game at 12.7 than you do in one of the best 10.7 MBTs at it’s own BR?
is this too little? i play russian tanks with that load
also t64 has a different ammo layout to t72 just keep that in mind
but they themselves are not the ones causing the whole space program
I can ask the same question about the kh-38mt …
It has dual mode seeker laser and mmw radar
But for sake of balancing thisng they could give it an ir seeker if they consider mmw to be op… but somehow they don’t want to because if would shift the balance more to the middle wich is not good considered we see the russian favoritism.
49 games man, what are you on about ? Of course you’re gonna have extreme winrates, near 0% or 100%. Play more with it.
I’m only talking about heavy vs heavy only. The T32 stands no chance compared to russian heavies.
i dont even need to show you that since you yourself know those two are frontally immune to its APHE
So you’re admitting T32 cannot do a single thing against those biased vehicle, while the russian side can obliterate the T32 ?
Do you understand there is a lack of balance, disadvantaging NATO ?
Do you understand the only heavy russian weakspots are tiny driver sights + tiny cupolas, compared to massive NATO weakspots ?
well the IS tanks and do anything if they are propped up by a time curb so i think that balances them out
yeah right massive t32 weakspots mhm
I can change the ammo layout after taking that photo buddy, its not hard to do that you know.
You’re telling me? XD
As you can see i only took 5 shells and got the exact same results on your photo, its not so hard to play with your ammo count before taking those shots buddy.
It doesn’t take space engineering knowledge to understand that op meant the whole system in this case.
You shoot right you shoot left you shoot center, the autoloader will explode.
then take 16? whats the problem if you can test this yourself?
actually no, it will explode if you hit the ammo (and rng doesnt screw you up)
No, the problem is that it is the autoloader that eats the spalls. Thus, if only the back of the autoloader is filled, and that you shot the front of it, the ammo won’t explode. Which is completely BS.
And of course, the definition of a russian bias (artificially buffing).
