https://www.youtube.com/shorts/c5B3rj_a0I4
Still waiting for NATO SPAAs to be able to do that
Plot twist: will never happen. Give everything to Russia/China, and nerf the ADATS
Thats not how burden of proof works.
If you make a claim you must back it up. As of yet what you’re doing us pure heresay without bringing any credible information to the table.
I will say it’s also the first time I’ve seen someone say the T90M trunion acts as armour.
As I’ve never had the issue whilst shooting them or using them.
Assuming you’re grown man you can search the forum itself to find revelant information on its thread, I don’t document every single post I see and surely not gonna spend my time to find them just to prove it to you.
You’re not a child so you don’t need handholding in this case.
Not my problem if you don’t follow revelant threads, I bet you also don’t know Gaijin added anti radiation line as part of armor to T-Series with recent uptades.
Its not my concern whether you have issues with gun trunnions or not but its known feature in this game, in fact Abrams is also famous soaking damage through its Gun trunnion and I believe @IHаteCAS posted multiple footages where his shell failed to penetrate Abrams Trunnion.
I suggest follow revelant threads more consistently instead of talking based on personal opinions.
Adding MITL would be way worse than keeping the current F&F implementation, imagine a MI28 (or an Israeli MH60 with spike NLOS) hovering 3 meters from spawn and slinging missiles after missile.
It’s not about hand holding.
At all.
then do not, and let me write this for you in bold, make the claim if you refuse to back it up.
I assume you mean liner and yes i am aware of it.
Though is it not only a smattering of tanks which have it last i looked.
A known feature a person with 6 years and 4200 hours has never heard of.
Or maybe its not a feature, a known issue or a known subject etc, a feature implies something important, interesting or typical of a place or thing.
When it’s none of those.
-
1 i work my ass off and do not and will not spend every waking minute following literally hundreds of thousands of threads.
-
2 I’ve been relatively active in catching up on most things off with the forums aka bug reports etc.
-
3 if you make a claim, stating it’s well known yet no one has mentioned it here bar you, it is up to you, to provide some kind of actual hard proof of said claim.
A persons videos are not hard proof.
While i know certainly parts of the russian mbts will soak spall, I’ve not seen anyone claim the trunions will completely eat a round, nor for abrams.
And ive nearly 3000 games between rank 7 + with both russia and USA.
So rather than be petulant about it, with remarks about, handholding, being a grown man etc, if you’ve such free time as to sit here all day and keep up with every single video posted, share it here.
Burden of proof
Seems to be more of a Leopard 2 issue than a certain T series boon.
1 Like
Thank you mate, I’ll give it a good read when I’ve a spare momemt.
Wasn’t their main point about that the fact that Brimstones have LOAL capability?
If so then why not just… add them to the game without LOAL???
I usually do try and play devils advocate when it comes to stuff like the MT (mostly because Japan CAS kinda sucks without it), but denying FNF Brimstones is just… dumb.
1 Like
LOAL and the radar seeker.
4 Likes
I mean that does kinda make sense. I wouldn’t wanna get hit by some random friendly Brimstone…
But then why not just add them with an IR seeker like MT?? At LEAST it’s still FNF Brimstones. 🥀
Well i mean if theyre not LOAL then the danger would be the same as with current IR guided AGMs so i dont really get that explanation…
The snail works in mysterious ways.
2 Likes
It is, you basically refuse to make 5 min search and demanding from opposite side.
I can claim whatever I want, if you want disprove it however it’s your job to find the actual source.
Quite amount of T-Series benefits from this a lot, haven’t countered another nations tanks that recieved this feature then I again I didn’t checked deliberately every single one of them.
In that case I have an account that is 11 years old and I have much more hours in this game, just because you didn’t counter it nor acknowledge it doesnt mean its not there.
Gameplay time is not your strong suit against me, try harder.
Same here, you’re not the only one who works and has tons of responsibilities, especially when you’re working at multimillion dollar company’s finance department., doesn’t mean you cannot follow revelants threads in this forum.
Seems like you’re not active enough considering you asked evidence multiple times.
Asking proof means you’re trying to debunk my claim which in this case its up to you find revelant sources.
It seems you dont even know the basic debating rules.
And I have much more games than you between rank 7 and 9, so what’s your point?
I’m pretty sure my job requires much more efforts than yours so you can take it with a grain of salt.
Leopards benefits least from trunnion, the post literally explains that how T-Series and Abrams benefits from it most.
@Jεcka almost forgot, sorry
This osa tried its best but there isnt much to do vs 8 vikhrs. Just kept adding them 1 by 1.
If you go to say, university and write up a thesis, whos job is it to provide a source to the claims made in said thesis?
If you are even in high-school, and write an essay, does the teacher have to prove your sources? Or is it obligatory to attach a source to a claim.
I mentioned a counter point that in my experience that craps not happened, to which @H_ngma kindly posted me a link to what you mentioned.
As i genuinely lack time and haven’t even managed to turn on my laptop today and wont for another 8 hours to play or fact check.
As i am in fact working.
I know the 55s recieved it however I can double check for us tonight if you’d like.
But i assume its as poorly implemented as always.
Encounter* + I am acknowledging it, if i was to catagorically deny it, plus sources and say you were lying, which i didn’t i just said to show me.or throw me a source, and you flat out refused.
try harder , as if its a competition, i care not one wit for your gametime, nor should you care for mine the manner in which you are.
Many things have changed since i began playing, so my point is in that time ive never heard of a mention of trunnions soaking spall, in fact the only thing I’d heard about trunnions was related to the CR2 leak.
Sounds to me like you’d better focus more on that than the forum sir.
And that is as much time as I have ill.meed to address the rest later.
Thats a bold statement coming from one who’s practically active here every hour of the day lol.
But guess being a profesor en titular isn’t effort lol.
Grow up mate.
Yeah i know but this seems less like a “T series get an unfair, unrealistic advantage” situation but more like a “Germany gets screwed over again for no reason” situation.
If you think Thesis and debating are the same thing I got bad news for you buddy.
See he can find the revelant source by simply 5 minutes of searching just like everybody else, for the record I’m also working my ass off and replying you on my smoke breaks.
Its still not an excuse.
T-72B3/A,T-90M, terminators also recieved it which is the main point.
Thats pretty pisspor counter argument considering you’re the one who brought up first.
Now dont be shy.
Or I’m just simply managing my time better than you, maybe you should work on your managing skills cause it seems you lack that ability a lot.
Oh really then check the time gaps between my each message to you smart guy.
Its also really funny considering you also claim having no time to find revelant sources but can also reply my each messages under one hour constantly.
I guess some people do really suck when it comes to calculating and managing time, not my problem tho.
Debate wasn’t about if Germany is suffering more tbh but I understand your point.