Those 💩heads that talked smack about arcade obviously never played it. It’s a different ball game as it requires different set of skills, good reflex and decision making to do well. Arcade is like boxing, realistic is MMA, kns is an excellent boxer while sadriper is a mediocre MMA fighter and obviously he can’t box either lol
3 Likes
stat shark is pretty unreliable so i think comparing stats isn’t the way to confirm Russian bias.
The arcade matxhmaking is also just hella weird. I played an arcade game with a couple of friends by mistake. I was in my AML 90 fighting Object 279s while there were helis and an A-10 in the air.
I had no idea what was happening.
3 Likes
Oh I don’t care about supposed bias. It’s purely about SadRIPers (mid as hell) skill level.
If they want to talk shit in public, they better be able to back it up. And so far SadRIPer has nothing to back anything up.
2 Likes
yes true but do mind, Kncs started the whole crapping about stats thing.
1 Like
In this case I do agree, but I have seen SadRIPer cope in a lot of threads by now. They are no better.
4 Likes
Sounds like confirmation bias
1 Like
American bias is getting on my nerves.
F-15A is 13.0 while Mig-29G is the same BR? What is this nonsense!?
P51H5NA at 6.3 while my Ta-152 is 6.3, Spitfire is 6.7, and Ki-84 Hei is 6.3.
F-18A Is 12.3 while the Mig-29 is 12.7 with far worse IR missiles, RWR, and dogfight performance.
Let alone the fact that USA has a 2.7 Corsair while the identical Corsairs are 3.0 elsewhere.
Lowest BR jet of 5.7. 4.3 if we call in the Fireball.
120S is 10.3 with M829A1, a round better than T-80BVM’s round.
F2H-2 is 7.3 while R2Y2s are 8.0.
4x AIM-9Bs at 8.3.
USA gets F-117 before China gets FCK1…
M1A1 HC is 12.0!? While T-80BVM and Leclerc are 12.7 firing worse rounds… insanity.
M10 Booker is 10.7 with lolpen round, while TAM-2C is 10.3 with inferior rounds, and VT-5 is 11.7 with similar capabilities.
USA got to keep its event Merkavas giving it a boost on close quarters maps for 9.3, 9.7, and 11.3/11.7.
T26E5 is still 6.7 while IS-2 remains the same BR despite being worse in all aspects.
T58 is still 8.3… self explanatory. BMPT was already moved up 1.0 BR while T58 remains at its release BR.
USA and France have the lowest BR Sherman of 3.3.
USA almost single-handedly caused strike aircraft to lose air spawn when A-7D ended matches within 2 minutes.
USA has dominated for 7 years! Isn’t that enough?
This post is satire. None of these statements are my opinion, and this is the first post I’ve made in such a manner.
1 Like
About to get worse if the br change goes through (which most likely will I think)
My dude you’re negative in that busted vehicle.
3 Likes
Russian any vehicle is so OP
Nerf it
Otherwise no one will pay for other country
Your USA top tank win rate only 40%
What you said doesn’t match the facts you presented
2 Likes
1- Read the last part of the post.
2- Win rate is a stat of team skill, not individual vehicle capability.
2a- Most OP vehicles don’t have high win rates.
Most high win rates are on balanced vehicles.
1 Like
I’d give you 3/10 for your rage bait.
2 Likes
my guy i literally play russia too now. Thats just how the damn game plays
1 Like
For the most part any biased vehicles and BRs you can overcome with skill, patience and positioning but with BMPT you need also to put a lot of luck into equation and that makes it unacceptable.
If anyone believes that when of big three tech trees gets like 65% WR on any BR is due to skilled playerbase should not even be discussed with and treated like a troll.
1 Like
No, its not, because I’ve played a bit of low tier USA and had the exact same things happen. I’ve also had such things happen whilst playing USSR TO other nations’ tanks.
1 Like
Idk bro russias tank fleet is practically gone on top of it turns all the crew into literal cosmonauts
1 Like
Its actually not. Around 100 new tanks are produced at the Ural Plant (T90M’s) a month, and they refurbish T80s into the BVM model as well, at a lesser rate. Since Ukraine is using strictly T64’s and T72’s, not including ‘gifted’ NATO vehicles and other Warsaw Pact vehicles from Poland, etc. and has 0 ways of refurbishing OR producing new tanks, its actually the other way around. Please keep your biased narratives out of factual discussions from now on!
And this doesn’t happen to Ukrainian tanks? Grow up.
1 Like
The total wartime output of the Ural plant for T90’s is something like 650 tanks. That’s on average 14 tanks per month since the war started. Very far off from your 100 units a month figure. Even if we go by the production numbers for 2025, it would only average to 25 tanks a month. Your figure does not seem accurate anyways, because the Russian MOD has a target of 83 new tanks per month for the entire military by 2028.