For the most part any biased vehicles and BRs you can overcome with skill, patience and positioning but with BMPT you need also to put a lot of luck into equation and that makes it unacceptable.
If anyone believes that when of big three tech trees gets like 65% WR on any BR is due to skilled playerbase should not even be discussed with and treated like a troll.
No, its not, because I’ve played a bit of low tier USA and had the exact same things happen. I’ve also had such things happen whilst playing USSR TO other nations’ tanks.
Idk bro russias tank fleet is practically gone on top of it turns all the crew into literal cosmonauts
Its actually not. Around 100 new tanks are produced at the Ural Plant (T90M’s) a month, and they refurbish T80s into the BVM model as well, at a lesser rate. Since Ukraine is using strictly T64’s and T72’s, not including ‘gifted’ NATO vehicles and other Warsaw Pact vehicles from Poland, etc. and has 0 ways of refurbishing OR producing new tanks, its actually the other way around. Please keep your biased narratives out of factual discussions from now on!
And this doesn’t happen to Ukrainian tanks? Grow up.
The total wartime output of the Ural plant for T90’s is something like 650 tanks. That’s on average 14 tanks per month since the war started. Very far off from your 100 units a month figure. Even if we go by the production numbers for 2025, it would only average to 25 tanks a month. Your figure does not seem accurate anyways, because the Russian MOD has a target of 83 new tanks per month for the entire military by 2028.
Yeah i think i got my numbers wrong. Its closer to around 250-300 units a year, not 100 a month. thanks for picking that up!
Yak-9k and its APHE shells are currently super annoying. It gets worse every day. You even see them at higher BRs, dropping heavy tanks with ease.
That’s a lie, they don’t have an industrial capacity to do that. That would require a full war rail economy which no can do due to “we’re not at war” type of narrative.
Moving at a speed of a sea urchin. For the same reason.
Where that is coming from? Unlike certain great pretender their economy is justified to be a full wartime one.
That’s what rusians have been trying to convince the world for a while, futile and funny, lol
theres not
Tank u very much
If they had one, they’d have the T-55 Marksman as their only 8.0mm anti-aircraft gun, but no, they’re the only nation without a kan…rous 35mm gun.
We could count the BMPTs, but since they’re different vehicles, it doesn’t matter now, right?
A most player play Russia and Russia team average win rate at any time is high
The fact that their plants have been bombed to bits. As well as the fact that the T-64 has not been produced since the 70’s. The most Ukraine can do considering their misfortunes as of late is refurbish their stocks. If you have ANY information that suggests otherwise, please provide it!
Convince the world of what exactly? Keep your russophobia to yourself.
Incredible how can one manage to shoot below the carousel.
Top attack missile btw.
The only working top attack missile is LMUR 
and it has 0 documentation
Bad shot in general but I’m supristed the fuel tank managed to sent that dart away from the critical models
Out of 20 13.0 GRB games, 5 of them was played along with Russia.
I lost 11 of them against Russia VS 9 victories, among them 5 victories along with Russia. So basically, Russia won 11+5 = 16 games and NATO won 4 games. Russia has a 80% winrate at 13.0 GRB.
It follows this thread : Russia dominates 12.7 GRB and it is a problem I made this morning, when I was publishing 18 games won by Russia in 13.0 GRB VS 3 games won by NATO, out of 21 13.0 GRB games. Russia had 86% winrate during these 21 first games.
The game is rigged, it is obvious. There is a monumental bias towards Russia at 13.0 GRB (at any BR imo), and people can’t say there is no bias anymore.
yeah lets nerf russian tanks
Any other similar shot on NATO MBTs would have sent the tank to Oblivion
Hes gotta be doing this on purpose
