This really sounds like Pax Americana or American bias ngl.
If you are really French, you sound more American than my American friend.
I’m really french though
I cannot lie about the plain truth. Money is power. They have the biggest military in the world, what can I say. Let’s be honest, the only military which can eventually dominate the world someday would be the US, Russia or China. Forget about europe or other nations lol
You can’t compare their army to the italian army for example. And I’m saying that while also having italian origins
from last month or so
It changes depending the BRs
France fights Russia more, more often at top tier grb than at 9.7 for example
Your numbers might be a gross average throughout the BRs
EDIT : for example : USA with USSR… 25% only at top tier grb… is not true
first post has no sources cited, Lolman’s reports include one bug report which was fixed and one who’s sources are just images from news sites. I don’t have the mathematical knowhow to confirm the accuracy of the bug reporter’s statement (the bug reporter stated themselves that they don’t either)
The bug report may also be outdated thanks to the new internal modules.
The other two are stuck in “accepted” limbo just like so many other bug reports. Nothing special unfortunately. So many bug reports just end up like that regardless of which vehicle they’re for (besides rafale)
This is for top tier, I’ll post the source in a sec
Ok so there are sources, as some were accepted (provided sources for that)
As a rule I ignore sources coming from news sites.
Gaijin rarely accepts those as proof of anything unless it’s weapon loadouts iirc
No.
USA only teamed up 25% of the time with Russia at 12.7 GRB, is absolutely false. They’re teamed up together way more often.
Same with Russia and the UK. They very often teamed up together at top tier grb
Some numbers look true (France does look teamed up 23% of the time with Russia at top tier grb. Russia and Germany 50%, looks good too), but some look weird.
where’s your source?
1 Like
As a rule I ignore sources coming from news sites.
You make up your own rules, I make up mine.
I state what I see throughout thousands of top tier games. The UK, Italy, the US and Germany are often teamed up with Russia. The numbers don’t look right.
If those numbers are accurate then top tier is even more cooked than i thought. Imagine russian winrates if they werent paired with the worst performing nation half the time and vice versa lol
1 Like
Gaijin doesn’t accept sources from 3rd party sites.
You need primary sources (manuals and brochures) or multiple good secondary sources.
Oh, and show any calculations you have done to prove what you’re saying.
News sites are third party sources
You need primary sources (manuals and brochures)
When it comes to NATO, they’re considered “marketing lies”, conveniently
Russian bias really shines in 2nd battle of El Halamein, Attica and Mozdok!
Lol did i say it doesn’t have a reason to exist anymore? I said there are quite a few reasons you can pick up the F-15C Ge over the su30sm.
Surely your reading skills are good /s
You literally said nothing, “aim-120D isnt a buff” lmao.
So we ignoring GNSS that can help actually guide missile to target better than R-77-1. And even in the case better time to target, IOG drift being minimized actually helps when the target is maneuvering so both missiles will be on par as they have a better chance with datalink to adjust their course, so dont use that useless argument of better tti. And omg warhead lmao… the difference isnt even huge.
How many lies are you going to put up, whilst also spoke about pesa vs aesa performance. To which you ignored because you have nothing to say.
And the fact of Countermeasures is far superior in the GE.(again you ignored)
As expected you have no idea what youre talking about and you try to act smarter why not even giving a single reason or argument at all why x is not better or a buff.
If you want to type alot of words do it else where you know? Or spew nonsense i think its amusing.
He doesn’t have a source, he just pulls stuff out of his a**.
He only wants/counts evidence that proves his already established believes. Everything that conflicts with those believes is instantly wrong.
have you seen the buffs the rafale got for no real reason?
The French Rafale C F3 does not use a HMD IRL…
Every nation has this happen, every single one.
1 Like
Though I understand and agree that there is russian bias, but I just want to know, what can we do to make a change? Like will this post do anything at all? I am pretty sure gaijin will ignore this anyway.
1 Like
It was proven to be tested on the F3 tho just like the additional MICAs. Did it need those buffs on release? Absolutely not. But its also not remotely the same as russian vehicles getting stuff that doesnt exist or has no proof whatsoever to ever be relevant on that specific vehicle.
No other nation has this happen to them.
2 Likes