Russian Bias in 2026?

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

You’re the one gaslighting here.

“muh Russian bias” - *shows a clip of him doing the same thing over an over again expecting a different result"

Spoiler

image

And even with their overperforming ERA they are just mid.

Nerf their era and they just become sad. I’m all for fixing the weird ERA stuff, as long as it comes with BR reductions where needed.

Skill issue on your part, can’t even check a name on a video + missing the point (on purpose ofc, because won’t admit russian ERAs eat DARTs while they simply shouldn’t) stating it wouldn’t be necessary to shoot somewhere else, if the shots actually pened the area in the first place, as they should have.

@_Renzo

NATO main coping once again, or russian ERAs/side armors/autoloaders problem exposed ? Which one is it ?

I had no reason to assume the clip came from someone else.

He’s shooting the same spot over and over again expecting a diff result

he could have just shot under the ERA bags, completely bypassing them…
Or simply a different spot so his spall hits something that isn’t already dead

1 Like

You can keep sending those clips, but that doesn’t change what half of them are lol.

Russian side armor should be fixed, but that Justinplays clip was not due to side era.




Other clips. What’s gonna be the russian main excuses this time @MiGoon_Fox-3 @AlvisWisla ?

Too angled ? “Pened the ERA but not the armor behind, so ERA didn’t really get pen” ? Shot from too far ? Should have shot on the bottom of the tank, skill issue on your part ?

Which ones it’s gonna be this time ?

He’s shooting the exact spot where if it was a NATO side armor instead, it wouldn’t have been dead from the 2nd shot already

He literally shot 10 times an area with and without ERAs, staying away from the track area 80% of the attempted shots. That red gunner should have been dead since the 2nd-3rd shot.

Stop finding all the ridiculous excuses in the world to defend Russia at all costs man, it’s laughable. “Aah aaaurgh he should have shot under the ERAs or somewhere else, skill issue” => if it were a NATO MBT instead, it would have died after 2 shots, with or without ERAs. You just can’t say Russia is artificially buffed

Wait wait wait wait.

It takes you more than 1-2 shots on average to kill Russian MBTs? For real?

You’re kidding right ?

The second and third shots, first against an ERA then against the raw armor, literally did nothing except a yellow then black ammunition

I want to hear you say there is a problem in the ERAs/side armors modeling for russian MBTs, I want to hear it

No, I said in this particular clip, if the hstvl shot a NATO side armor instead, it would have taken 2 shots max to kill it

First shot got almost entirely eaten by the track, can happen to NATO MBTs as well.

Second shot, sure that was BS.

Third shot was the killing shot iirc.

No wtf ? There have been 4 shots total (4th being the kill shot)

The 3rd shot followed the 2nd one, he shot exactly at the same spot, where the ERA had been destroyed after the 2nd shot

This is total russian buffed modeling bs

It would have never happened with a NATO ERA, with a NATO side armor in general neither

It’s 5 in the morning and I was wayching on my phone.

Now some people may ask why I even entertain your skill issue coping that early in the morning, and that would be a very good question.

Was just checking if you were able to admit there is a russian bias when the said bias is obvious and cannot be denied

You didn’t disappoint

@SadRIPer
I gave you explanations for every situation.

These are explanations I’ve been giving for 7 years now.
All of this information is veteran.

On top of this, I’ve never been a nation main in War Thunder; The closest was in 2019 when I was completing Japan as my first completed tech tree, however shortly after USA, Britain, and France were completed.
USSR was shortly after that as I was forced to complete it to play with friends at the time [warsaw vs NATO was enforced back then], and if the matchmaker didn’t work like that back then, USSR would still be an unfinished tech tree to this day.

As for your next set of videos, no visual this time since your posts are as disrespectful today as mine were in 2023.

1- Server vibrated the tank, and the round bounced 3 times before passing onto the side armor at high angle. OFL F1 isn’t ideal.
2- That is an ancient version of the game when the ammo desync bug was still occurring.
3- Round penetrated, hit cam incorrectly showed round stored?
4- That’s just a high angle bounce…
And the ERA didn’t eat any of those rounds.

SadRIPer… I’ve shot hundreds to thousands of T-series tanks. I’ve seen it all except “ammo not exploding”, and I can say with certainty that I’ve had 99% skill issues, 1% server issues. And most of that 1% involves BMPTs.

1 - “Server vibrated”, sure server “vibrates” on a perfect diagonal shot. Funny how server always “vibrates” for russian MBTs, but it’s a kill shot if it were the exact same shot but against a NATO MBT.
3 - Yes yes, probably the hitcam is at fault, definetely not the mariage of russian ERA + autoloader eating the DART
4 - High angle bounce which should have pened 150% and destroyed the engine if it was a NATO MBT instead. But the russian ERA said otherwise

Also a good excuse to defend Russia inconsistencies as I can see

@SadRIPer
All of your posts on the forum in the last month is defending Russia.

Hit cams showing rounds loaded that aren’t actually there is a known issue with the hit cam; it has nothing to do with “Russia”.

And no, that angle wouldn’t even pen the Leopard hull roof.