Yeah it’s pretty noticeable that most of the known russia defenders are silent or agree that the current situation is a complete joke.
40% over 8 br steps for one out of 10 trees is absolute bonkers
1 Like
Unfortunely, I have a 10.7 kvt in my US tree
So I’m still cooked
My french tree has a 10.7 2a4
Still cooked
And we are both considerably better than you, so that means your opinion is on a whole lower tier going by your logic.
3 Likes
My 10.7 line-up also collecting dust for months now.
Gotta protect the business model of a smoll indie family company.
I dont see your high tier logic on this game which still has on-going problems like thousand of post and rants from large numbers of players. Seems like you and other couple names satisfied on the current state of the game balance.
Whatever helps you coping russian main
Jon general opinion on NATO bushmaster/spikes IFVs : they’re sad, they’re bad, they suck
How strange he thinks that too…
1 Like
1 Like
Damn you really ran out of copium huh? Russia isn’t even in my top 5 most played nations at top tier ground.
2 Likes
Not even answering the IFV argument, interesting.
1 Like
I was only replying to SadRIPers inconsistent logic and using that against him.
I’m not satisfied, I’m just not satisfied about different things.
I’m a ground player mostly so I want top tier CAS nerfed hard. Yes KH38MT should be removed and the Mi-28NM should be nerfed, but they are far from the only CAS I want nerfed.
I hate people overhyping the T-series, SadRIPer is so overconfident that he often confuses his own skill issues with Russian MBTs being strong.
1 Like
Didn’t even see the IFV argument due to the wall of youtube thumbnails (spoiler tabs exist to avoid that btw).
The 9.7 bushmaster vehicles are generally okay, the ones above 9.7 are sad. However a general accuracy buff for the 30mm bushmasters would still be nice for the 9.7 ones.
He put “lie” under “best ifv” on warrior review preview, I chose to spit on his opinion because warrior is indeed best ifv at those brs.
1 Like
What about the 9 other IFVs though ?
Also, he didn’t make a video about the french VBCI 2 (but we all know it sucks - as every other NATO IFVs)
Your opinion about NATO Tiger Helicopters being way worse (for objective reasons presented in the post) than the russian Mi-28NM ?
I forgot to add the fact that as it is currently 12.7 GRB, it basically always faces Mi-28NMs as they are at 13.0 GRB (I don’t think it only faces max 4 of them, as a 8.7 GRB player would face max 4 9.7 GRB players, for example).
Also, keep in mind I didn’t focus on the AH-64E nor the AH-129D as I was solely talking about the Tigers, but the same reasoning apply to them in terms of unbalance against the russian Mi-28NM.
Bradley and ajax ones are lies. Others are just common knowledge you would hear from anyone else.
Just nerf LDIRCM hard for the Mi-28NM and all AH-64E(make it so that it can only blind 1 or 2 missiles at the same time like it’s supposed to irl) and make all helis easier to target for ARH missiles (the rotors should give off enough radar signature).
That should close the gap between the Tigers and the Mi-28NM/AH-64E to justify the 0.3 BR increase, but I’d also be super fine with the Tigers moving to 12.3 as well.
2 Likes
So Bradley and Ajax are not incredibly sad ?
With their sad low fire rate autocannons, and TOW-2B missiles which don’t even work
It wouldn’t make up enough for the lack of armaments and abilities the Tiger has compared to Mis and AHs
He said bradley went from pain to playable which is wrong.
And ajax isnt sad because it uses dollar store bofors with irst and dollar store hevt. Just bit worse cv90 but much better than things like m3a3, dw etc
He said bradley went from pain to playable which is wrong.
Yes, it’s still fat, bugged and very bad