coming from rusaboo troll who just in second sentence admit that R77-1 having different properties making them stronger… gj
“low” altitude is broad definition. ground level? pure nonsense for Aim 120. Getting lecture from one of trio forum trolls pretending everything is ok with russia while making claims like PUMA is better than BMPT and other quite funny statements is very laughable at best :) You, Renzo and Morvan are quite notorious for your forum patrolling and rushing to defense on definitely not Russian bias. By the way your claim that AGM 65 is better than KH 38mt or is its equivalent is also quite funny.
@Hans_von_Grobel
Ah yes, accusing everyone you come across of being malicious.
Keep defending [shilling for?] your precious Russian vehicles.
“Kh-38MT is superior to AGM-65D.” - Me, countless times.
“BMPT is superior to Puma.” - Me.
So you either miswrote, or are attempting to provoke others.
Oh, and low altitude means multipathing in the context of my post.
1 Like
just 3 of you :) there are even post on redits about you sitting on forum almost nonstop spreading nonsense.
KH 38 is same as AGM 65 and Pantsir is not strong SPAA, no need to do anything about KH 38, its now 50/50. Your words. I wont be spamming this thread with all your nonsense on this nor i will spend hours searching for every of your fantasy claim in different threads.
@Hans_von_Grobel
You can think Kh-38 and AGM-65 are the same if you want, but I won’t think that.
I was calling for CLAWS equivalent SPAA since 2022. Pantsir, an inferior SPAA, was added in 2023.
CLAWS finally got added in 2025.
I’ve been calling top CAS OP since 2021.
Kh-38MT is superior to AGM-65D no matter what you claim.
Pantsir was never enough to deal with top CAS added in 2022 and 2023. CLAWS and equals were necessary.
Pantsir, CS, etc were good counters to CAS added in 2022, but with LGBUs gaining CCIP, and Pantsir being knee-capped to 13km against jets for the first 17 months of its life, LGBUs were still okay against tanks.
1 Like
tbh the WT reddit it just a echo chamber that is just sitting there gaslighting it self over and over with nonsense
5 Likes
this forum isn’t any better, its highly moderated and most likely paid trolls like Alvis are pretending to argue about everything. To flood the forum with nonsense.
What ever floats your boat. All your replies and claims are free to check. I wont waste my time doing that. You are almost nonstop posting about everything everywhere and i wont be wasting my time with you, you are not arguing you are just flooding forum with nonsense to please gaijin. Again you are well known all over the internet, better to change your name again RazerVon
you clearly said otherwise in KH 38 thread. btw Pantsir isn’t alone on map right… love how you are on purpose missing the whole context of russian vehicles supporting each other in one huge combined arms complex with several game breaking examples.
oh and i forgot about your great posts about Yak 9 with 45mm APHE being equivalent to HS 129 or Grizzly, coz they are all the same planes :D
@Hans_von_Grobel
Dude…
People are not malicious because we call out BMPT being OP and Kh-38MT being OP when both were blatantly OP.
People are not malicious for complaining about BR compression.
These aren’t pretend arguments, these are valid criticisms we have as thousands of people.
I’ve only ever said Kh-38MT is more powerful than AGM-65D in a direct comparison:
March 2025, and was implied in the post in October 2024.
However, implications aren’t as good as explicitly saying things so I made it explicit in the March 2025 edit.
I’ve said both are more OP against ground units, forcing players to spawn CAP to deal with Kh-38MT and AGM-65D slingers consistently.
Pantsir only got its 16km effective range in October 2024 after a guidance buff to its missiles that major update.
The fact that no one had a CLAWS equivalent SPAA to deal with F-15E and Su-34 was atrocious.
I also never gave an opinion on the Yak’s 45mm APHE round anywhere online; So I’ll give one here: 45mm APHE fired from an aircraft is at least a top 10 anti-tank round in the sub-8.0 BR aircraft.
Is it the best? Probably not, but it is at least potent when in the right hands.
1 Like
Is this about the whole “secondary spalling = false” line of code situation that got quickly debunked?
Look who’s talking, the crybaby, just another one on this forum, like you there are plenty here, “admits that the missile has properties that make it stronger,” this is the most nonsensical thing I’ve ever read, after all, for your empty head it must be difficult to understand that all missiles in the game act differently and the only thing that almost all of them have in common is the seeker, you only have a skill problem.
1 Like
3 Likes
Kind of just nullified all of your arguments by taking answers from reddit.
4 Likes
@Heavytanker1945 @CAS_is_Bаlаnced
Definitely the same. Keep in mind T-72A has the best gun depression of them all, so you’ll only get worse results with the others. Vehicles like former are much easier to play and find spots with on maps that aren’t Cargo Port or Sweden.
4 Likes
I know this is a factual statement, but it is still hilarious to read 😂 RU…“best” gun depression 🤣 I lol’d.
1 Like
4 Likes
Jeez I was expecting some toxic comments but the sheer amount of delusions and toxicness caused me to cough irl.
2 Likes
Well they are just such different tanks that putting them in a 1v1 in a corridor they both pushed into (a situation the leclerc shouldnt get itself into in the first place) and which is as favorable as a situation for the t90m as possible obviously favors the frontally much better armored tank. So thats a stupid matchup to begin with.
but to say that the t90m is worse than the leclerc in everything but armor is also not quite correct and i think you know that. The t90m has a better dart (penetrator weighs 5 kg compared to the leclercs 4 kg dart with similar pen, but that still results in much better post pen damage), it has gen two commander thermals (that only the leclerc SXXI gets) it has LWS, spall liners, an he round, ess and ir air target tracking plus a top mounted 12.7. The Leclercs get none of that (well some do get one of those but none of the others) while still having worse gun depression than almost every other nato top tier mbt. In fact the difference of the leclercs gun depression to other nato tanks is the same like from Leclerc to t90m (2°)
The t90m is far from bad, by stats alone it somehow is my best performing russian top tier tank, it just needs to be played way more cautious than the t80s since you cant retreat, once youre in a bad position too far forward youre in big trouble.
Its just that those two with their differences of armor (much better on T90) and mobility (much better on Leclerc) results in such different playstyles that comparing them in: they both meet head on in an alley is just a stupid way of comparing them.
But yeah the leclerc definitely needs fixes and adjustments. One of the worst top tier darts on a quite sluggish platform (not in max speed but turning and maneuvering on hills is absolute dogwater on the leclerc somehow) with basically no armor (at least way less than most other top tier mbts, except the type 10) on the turret and the hull forces you to play in a weird way of brawling and holding certain positions and then see our abysmal dart fail to do damage in one of 5 shots and die because of that bs. EDIT: just remembered, the only 2 smoke pops and having no top mounted 50 cal on the leclercs is also annoying af.
People often trash talks about T-90M due to its reverse speed while completely ignoring its positive sides.
Honestly it gets boring at this point, its a great tank with many strengths and its my favorite Russian Tank at top tier.
2 Likes