which where bug reports were made and rejected
not the first time Gaijin rejected every sources despite if its posted by the Army themselves like Merkava 4s weight 80s tons are so and posted by the IDF themselves btw and still get rejected
1 Like
uhm maybe im blind but were exactly?
Ofc it wont be, no game is 100% but thats still not a reason for russia getting vip treatment
1 Like
Or Type 90 and Type 10 steels armor are better and Digital Gunsights which were also rejected despite the sources cause they believes its too broken for the game althought type 90s been in game for years now, being same BR as M1A2 for some reasons, and wrong track models, etcs
1 Like
Merkava 4m APS shouldn’t stop everything including Kh38mts despite it shouldn’t be able to, but it can reliably by the way cause this game is literally a sloppy made and coded . It doesn’t make any sense for either side
There is more like MiG29 gimping or Leclerc reload overperforming or T29 being immune to ammo det on launch or RU autoloader being gimped for a while (AZ still is)
TLDR gaijin is stupid
1 Like
I love 60% chances of autoloader getting jammed on Leclerc but we still got it nonetheless
Yes, there is even bias in the marketing itself.
Some people will again tell me that I’m coping, but remember the main WT trailer ? (this one : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=miVz9nsMYEw )
By sheer coincidence, at the end of the fight, it’s the russian mbt who wins lol. Also, see the moment where the AH-64 is about to hit the russian mbt with the missile ? The scene is stopped and we can’t see the result (probably the explosion) lol
In the new trailer (this one : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hrmMWJPDZ0E ), it was cool seeing rafales intercepting the chinese jet. But instead of them going into a reasonable dogfight where both parties would show strenght (so we could think “oh ok France and China are strong”), no it’s the Chad chinese pilot who does the cobra and probably destroys them all afterwards
There is always that little something against NATO forces I noticed.
This one might be a cope but eeh… I don’t believe in coincidence
yes all APS can kill all munitions, because Gaijin is too lazy to model them differently.
As for just plain op stuff on launch and for a while after there’s just so much:
PaKpuma, XP-50, Aerfer Ariete, M4A3 105, M1 Abrams, AH-1Z, Leopard 2A5, German KV-1B, CW-21, TURM III, IPM1, Coelian, HE 100, P-39N, J2M2, R3 T20, Mitsubishi T-2, EBR 1954, Gepard (TIer I), Harrier, SdKfz 140/1, F-14A, VIDAR, Kpz/MBT-70, Puma, T18E2, Schützenpanzer Puma, Ki-44-II, T58, Calliope, P-59, Conqueror, Centurion Mk.3, Etc.
And this is surface level.
1 Like
Not all, cause I tested with everything and by far after they “APS” bugged fix they made the APS on Merkava 4m just stops everything reliably except LMUR cause its a bit higher Approach angle
1 Like
They didn’t have it from the start which is why their KD was terrible as almost every nation had something to counter it.
Only until they got it, their KD was aligned with their US counter part. So I don’t understand you’re poit there.
Yeah and for the other half, it was. We don’t have the numbers for it but it could be said that there exist significantly more players that don’t have it than those who do.
Or it could be mean that it’s decent enough to handle brain dead CAS players which exist more than experienced players.
We don’t know.
If you look at the KD for the pantsir, it bumped up during september which could suggest that with the addition of the Ah-64E (for one of the biggest player bases in the game), the Pantsir was nessarry to counter them. In fact it somewhat maintained it’s KD, in November after other nations got them as well (even if they didn’t have LDIRCM), only until december when free vehicles were added for everyone, then it went down. the addition of LDIRCM for other ah-64e wouldn’t have mattered as it wouldn’t have affected the pantsir.
You’ll have to prove the the plane kills (under 12.0) / death, vs plane kills (over 12.0) / death. I could very easily say that pantsirs exist a lot more 12.0 - 13.0, than 11.0 - 12.0.
We don’t know
Okay good, finally you’re talking about something that isn’t relying on vague stats. Yes, the pantsir isn’t good at intercepting all 16 agms at the same time but it can intercept a decent amount. But that isn’t the full picture. If you allow for a helicopter to launch all 16 at the same time, then you have failed as an spaa. One of the biggest strengths of the pantsir is that it has a extremely good search/track radar. Once the top of the heli is detected, it can launch a missile and by the time it helicopter has the time to aquire a target, the missile would’ve already intercepted the helicopter.
Many maps are small and have buildings/trees and such which force FnF helis to climb. This puts them at a vulnerable against SACLOS spaa. It’s why many of the SACLOS missile have maintained a relatively consistent KD despite FnF helis being in the game.
Just an assumption though.
Nope, just pointing out a simple hypocrisy
and to be specific, the bug was about APS only works if u pop smokes
The Rafale had both tested irl which the french players proved.
Not a single credible bug report for that
Conflicting bug reports, both numbers have first hand sources
Genuinely no idea
Literally fixed the second proper sources were shown.
I always bring SACLOS and multiple sam system in same lineup but SACLOS is better cause ever since radar screen theyre the most benefits by it cause if you do use radar screen the server will guides the missiles for you and therefore it doesn’t use most of energy to follow your cursor
U can also try it in custom with Vt1, etcs
Rafale C F3 did not have HMD or 6 MICA irl.
MiG29 FM and lack of R-73s have been denied for ages, and now they pushed down F15A to the same BR so there’s no excuse.
GIAT literally states 6s, and so do manuals.
AZ/MZ had proper sources denied for a while.
1 Like
True OGs remembers how Leopard 2A5 was moving when it came out, the peaks of German teams and now it’s just a clown show lmfao but still IRST, Flakrak and 2A7 somewhat made them decent
1 Like
Yes it did test both.
Because the bug reports are objectively shit.
That’s called a loadout restriction, everyone has that.
And other sources state 5
So do hundreds of non russian bug reports with plenty of high quality sources
All your examples are knowledge problems but the point still stands that russia gets selective realism despite better knowledge. A 30mm belt doesn’t magically become 3 parts yet the one on the BMPT does.
2 Likes
So why is Mig 29As still being same BR as some F16As and fighting also F15, havent includes the r60 nerfs cause they think its too overpowered when theyre fighting a literally aim120 and aim9m, magic 2s, r73s, etcs on superior platforms and Fm and the match making ain’t helping either cause u maybe get like 1 downtier every 5-6 games if not more and doesn’t mean u also gonna get a lot of kills either or this case realizably 2 kills+
1 Like