They’re gonna tell you you’re coping
I still love you completely dodge my question
False. They absorb shots just like T-XX.
which i answered?
oh really?
It has an RHA trunnion that’s 20mm thick…
So yeah, it’s false cus it’s not a CHA one, and it’s still hollow.
It absorbing a shot is likely more due to overlapping plates rather than pure armor…
What has a 20mm rha trunnion? Proof?
you calling us people “kids” while yourself doesn’t even read this chat properly, my sorry if I didn’t see the vote .
and who’s the 78% of people that agrees with you? cause so far I been seeing 10 peoples explaining to you
can you answer this?
Thank god man, some people actually seing the obvious bias put in place
which you answered my question and i also answered?
??? Why would it be different to now? Im not advocating to substitute the BR system for historical matchmaking
Not relying on selective realism for balance is not the same as putting in historical matchmaking
Answer me as well dude
I really wanna know why you think its ok and unbiased that only one tree gets this favourable treatment
You’re not really that great of a reader aren’t you? respectfully
and the point of debating is also 2 side which agrees and don’t agrees and we did also gives the reasons why we doesnt think bias is a thing and its just a bad made models without reliable sources
Oh I misread it as TKX.
But even then, they only do so due to pure luck, because yeah they’re hollow. Unlike solid CHA ones of T-series :)
all i can say is that your creditability is really low to start calling people trash and uneducated when you dont even real my original post
What do you doubt about ?
Where he makes videos, you understand the underlying : he’s critizising how often Russia gets all the good stuff VS NATO getting nothing or bad stuff
Imo, at least
where did I say that? that im calling someone else trash and uneducated?
i was just asking that if you were a great reader or not respectfully
Abrams 2K and Type 90 have solid CHA trunnions.
