and the point of debating is also 2 side which agrees and don’t agrees and we did also gives the reasons why we doesnt think bias is a thing and its just a bad made models without reliable sources
Oh I misread it as TKX.
But even then, they only do so due to pure luck, because yeah they’re hollow. Unlike solid CHA ones of T-series :)
all i can say is that your creditability is really low to start calling people trash and uneducated when you dont even real my original post
What do you doubt about ?
Where he makes videos, you understand the underlying : he’s critizising how often Russia gets all the good stuff VS NATO getting nothing or bad stuff
Imo, at least
1 Like
where did I say that? that im calling someone else trash and uneducated?
i was just asking that if you were a great reader or not respectfully
Abrams 2K and Type 90 have solid CHA trunnions.
Probably, yes
true that russians do get some stuff for some reasons but theyre using the reasons to fill out br gap between pantsir and Buke m3 for example cause its missing 12.3 for some reasons and we could’ve gotten cooler vehicles for NATO instead of our 3285023458th Bushmaster IFV but then again we don’t decided that, they do and by far Russia are generating them moneys and a prems lineup at every brs so make sense
1 Like
theres bias in marketing but for me when come to ingame models, they rejected a lot of sources to a lot of vehicles so I wouldn’t be complaining smth thats already happens for decade
I think it’s okay for the sake of game balance. Gaijin loves to flip flop the meta to get people to grind new trees by buying premiums, and it’s not only Russia getting this treatment.
In a perfect world there would be 0 op stuff getting released, but that is never happening.
1 Like
Comparing stats do somewhat explains to vehicles and balancing purposes but using based on stats alone isn’t well explanatory however they do also for the players base skill and average and combine it with the vehicles stats to balance and Brs changes for them
Not even probably lol.
The top 5 most played vehicles in January were all russian, 8 and 10 were as well and 50% of the 10 most played Premiums were also russian.
1 Like
3 years ago they said they wouldn’t sell us “top tier” prems but they never tell us the definitions so there you go, now we have a loop hole to sell whatever we wants, as long as it’s not the max brs so therefore it’s not top tier
An example would be Rafale C F3 destroying top tier air for 1+ year, and it didn’t have hmd or 8 MICAS irl.
1 Like
and now we’re entering 5th gens update which also according to Gaijin, so I would expect a lot more prem “top tier” vehicles for the price of average Destiny 2 dlcs
Rafale on US carrier for trailer cause we cannot be bothered to model Charles De Gaulle
1 Like
Yes it is. That is my entire point. Other trees get op additions as well but this russian bias is not even about being op. Its bending realism so russia is stronger than it should be if the same rules applied to the russian tree as they do for everyone else. And i dont think that one tree should get preferential treatment, because game balance can and should be achieved without bias.
5 Likes
They’re missing 12.3 because pantsir s1 should be 12.3/12.7 instead lol
The problem is not the 236289th bushmaster ifv, it’s the fact they don’t fix the top down modeling approach of spike missiles for helis/ground vehicles and that they don’t balance the bushmaster with a burst fire mode or more pen/fire rate in general or something else with the accuracy for example
We don’t need more vehicles, even ifvs without crew members in the turret like they’re about to add
We need mechanic fixes. So NATO can finaly be competitive against RU
I literally sent an example of non Russia getting this treatment. Also, as sad as it is, the game will never be balanced.