Russian Bias in 2026?

The issue with using a high sample size (specifically in stat shark’s case) as evidence is that we don’t know what the sample size consists of. It’s not that I’m against statistics, it’s that we cannot come to a conclusion on how two vehicle interacts based on global statistics because there are so many factors that goes outside the scope of the conclusion.

For example, would it be wise to say that the IRIST is better than the Pantsir when it comes to taking out helicopters? Well according to Global stats, it has better KD than the Pantsir so in conclusion that would be yes, right? Of course not, LDIRCM directly affects IR missiles so that it doesn’t hit the target.

The same thing applies to when you compare the LDIRCM Heli vs the Pantsir using Global Statistics. It’s impossible to derive how good a vehicle is when it comes to taking out a certain type of target when all 4 types are combined into one (drone, heli, plane, munitions).

As far as my statement with the AFK, and stuff like that, it was to make a point that we can’t tell by how much the pantirs affected the 64E KD and vise versa. Though in hind sight, I definitely could’ve worded that differently.

What about italy? I’m looking at starting the grind for them again as It’s just italy and sweden to take to above 11.0.
The soviets I quite enjoy the T80UM2 and T80U at 11.7 but meh, it’s quite tedious the teams are absolutely useless.

That is true we can not analyse two vehicles against each other in a vacuum and i agree that the Pantsir definitely has a raison d’être at top tier due being the best SACLOS slinger but the other guy is correct. The Pantsir has so many games that if it was really good at killing LDIRCM helis then its stats would be better and LDIRCM Helis would perform worse at least the non russian ones.

1 Like

germany have 7 km range f&f missile so…

1 Like

How about i’ve just played 3 games back to bakc, and lost, funnily enough every single time to USA lol.

Sitting here chanting russian bias as if the big three aren’t babied af is just ridiculous.

I mean your monthly stats show you barely with a 47 percent win rate so it says a lot, coming barely halfway up the team each game lol

EDIT: Better than that, you’ve never used any other nation bar France and one US tank above rank seven. so what are you even on about russian bias etc, go use the damn tree properly and see how pitiful they are.

I knwo the arietes are right painful to use which is why I kinda gave it a pass once I got to the OF 40s and such

As far as i play against italy.

They kinda powerful, good mbt choice nice realod and of course lovely 2a7.

Cas wise its meh . Only having typhoon.

Sams ofc its good and if you enjoy light flanks tanks. Italy is for you

1 Like

Unarmored Leopard 2A5s pretty much.

1 Like

i see, so they’re pretty damn decent to use to be fair mate I quite enjoy the 2A5, however the Ariete is a bit shorter no? height wise

It was related to a whole thread, I didn’t read the most recent conversation. This thread is pretty sad as of late. From delusional ru mains bashing their head against just plain truth into delulu on delulu violence.

1 Like

I’m just 1 man unfortunely

@G3ntl3man95 Tiger helicopters are so bad it pains me to even talk about them lol

1700 hours, tons of top tier games

3 games is nothing, go play 30 of them in a row against Russia and show me the results pls, no more talking

1 Like

This got to be a joke. 🥀🥀

@SadRIPer has a 62% win rate in AH-64E.

Clearly suffering in his NATO tech tree. /s

3 Likes

But…but lmur…😢

Yeah this guy is trolling hard.

You didn’t count the VBCI + VBCI-2 + Jaguar + F16 + AH-64 I also use at top tier, independently from the others

Plus the terms and services of the game forbid you from playing it, you know that

Compare that to the 155% winrate of the mi-28nm

Oh I know it’s hopeless, but once I get curious about something I can’t stop.

Spoiler

8 games in so far and Russian winrate overall in these is 50%. Although those 3 losses were more up to incredibly incompetent teammates more than anything.

2 Likes

Keep on going until 20-30…

You’ll see the 50% slowly going towards 70%…

It shouldn’t even be a 50% to begin with. that Red desert game was a throw of gigantic proportions and we should have won that one against Russia easy.

1 Like

Soviets are slightly better on Red Desert than NATO tanks.
Less reliance on mobility, and more reliance on front armor.

1 Like