Russia getting a made up missile thats stronger than its real life counterpart while Italy,germany and Britain get a fantasy missile thats weaker than in real life is still bias.
The difference is that the F16 AJ is still a gap filler, is not op and its not miles better than what everyone else has
Sure new stuff should have and needs to get more leniency, because sources are harder to get but then Gaijin needs to be fair and allow every nation more lax sources
You can’t balance missiles on their own, as vehicles they’re attached to get the BR number, so looking at it that way is grossly wrong.
Something being OP changes from person to person, I already told you that.
Without it, Japan would have much worse CAS options than the others, just like RU without 38s.
Excusing something clearly fake just because of your personal feelings while going full out on the other thing is pretty much biased.
If you add a missile with limited (or increased) capabilites compared to real life youre balancing the missile not the vehicle its attached to. The Implementation is the balancing factor.
Something being OP does not change from person to person if its objectively better than its counterparts.
Im very much allowed to be biased, im not a game developer that needs a balanced game
P.S. remove the F16AJ for all i care just stop pretending that it has the same significance in game as the KH38MT
The missile is real, its the seeker thats in contention. I get im being a bit of a nerd but I at least think the distinction is important otherwise you make it sound like the entire thing is fantasy and thats not really fair.
But the seeker is the elementary part that makes it so strong
You’re in the end balancing the vehicle as that’s the only thing that can be balanced, as weaponry doesn’t hold BR. Something worse in one aspect might be better in another aspect to mitigate the former con, that’s the whole basis of asymmetrical balancing.
Read above and yes it can change.
Someone might think that getting killed from something that shouldn’t exist at all is OP, as that vehicle in the end should account for exactly 0 kills in total.
You’re allowed to be biased, but don’t expect your biased opinion to hold any importance when it comes to game balancing.
No it isn’t, it’s the speed.
Seeker is pretty much the same as 65D’s.
Pantsir couldn’t and still can’t deal with proper CAS.
Not really the same situation.
If you repeat a lie often enough, people will believe it, and you will even come to believe it yourself.
This is a quote from Goebbels, which if we apply to the “Bias accusation is a coping mechanism for skill issue” as @_Renzo said fits very well to the situation we are in. Searching the word “Russian bias” in the Urban Dictionary is rather a fun activity to do.
Looking at the videos from YouTube that @TROOPER7 attached to his comment, you’ll see that people interacting with said videos always agree with the “Russian bias is real” theory (it is; contemplation or speculation according to vocabulary.com).
What I’m trying to refute is that: Russian bias is such a big lie in my eyes, a speculation, a crazy theory that at this point people hold this as the biggest truth in the game. I would go in full mind manipulation discussion but is so futile, perhaps you know where I’m trying to get.
And other SPAA couldnt even deal with horrible CAS before so my point still stands
I don’t know what you’re trying to argue here.
You can’t simply isolate one part of the vehicle and say it’s OP just because of that.
Pretty much is if the game tries to be realistic.
Nothing is more OP than being killed by something that shouldn’t be a thing in the first.
Stats don’t play a role here, as anything over 0 K/D is too much for that work of fiction.
It’s true, it’s speculation, but there were some purposely done wrong modeling and other things. So now that the game behaves strangely during the clashes with the Russian tanks, you have the doubt that we are back to those “dark days.” Unfortunately, that’s fear talking, but without evidence you should not say anything
Edit To avoid confusion! This
So now that the game behaves strangely during the clashes with the Russian tanks
Does not mean that Russian tanks behave strangely, it mean that if the game behaves strangely with America it’s normal; but when it’s against Russia it becomes a “Bias” problem
so… ‘‘purposely done wrong modeling and other things’’, ‘’ the game behaves strangely during the clashes with the Russian tanks’’ , ‘‘you have the doubt that we are back to those “dark days’’. (so there were indeed dark days)…sorry but all these sound like a real speculation to me…
I’m saying just that…? The game behaves strangely even with the USA. Bad things had left in some people a bad taste and now they are jumping on the “Russian Bias” wagon
+I remember that there was a tank with a piece of armour that didn’t showed up in the protection analysis but was presente in the matches, idk maybe I’m tripping
There were over a dozen tanks with armor issues over the years.
T-44-100 was an M36 Jackson in the fact it didn’t have a roof.
Merkava had its turret armor duplicated.
Etc.
Yeye. Thanks, but I wasn’t saying bugs and missing pieces. I was speaking about a fake add on that wasn’t sataded
IS-6 had this, it’s mantlet was duplicated, but the Jagdtiger had the same issue.
The T29 was also immune to being ammo racked during that time, that strangely took ages to fix too.
Thats! An error turned into a “problem” of “bias”. Just making stuf up!
So, Armor in general is a buggy mess so it can’t be connected to any one nation. Same with ERA except it tends to benefit/Bug out more with ERA with lots of KE protection. (Still not connected but people can “Assume” russian bias from it)
KH-38MT was a missile that probably should have been added with this last patch with all the spaa. Regardless on if its seeker is real or not (Spaa patch should have come 1 - 1 1/2 years ago)
Most other missiles should have also come last patch but with more capabilities. (fnf Longbow but without its MM wave seeker for balance and brimstones as well) (Also looks like less favoritism to 1 nation if others get at least side grades)
The BI still has stupid fuel efficiency (So a moderate reason for bias)
Magical dircm on helicopters that is just badly implemented.
Yak-9k still yakin about
And every mbt should have come with their components / turret ring nerf modeled. (Not saying the abrams or leo’s are bad but it is still a straight nerf against them until everyone else gets them).
Probably alot more but thats generally the most used in russian bias right?
soviets has the worst tanks, worst planes at top br and ppl still hating soviets, this thread should be called “I hate russia pls nerf”