Ka52 isn’t immune, MI28NM and Z10ME definitely yes, no need to gaslight lol
The LDIRCM can defeat a lot missile, but they’re deffinetly not Immune, sorry. I’m not gaslighting. I did in my second battle with the IRIS-T, so if I can do it, so can the average Joe.
and I’m not no only one…
pretty certain dropping a 1000lb bomg within 10 foot of the tank would destroy it.! After all… a russian 100lb bomb seems to do it perfectly fine from over 30ft away often enough.! But, heyyyyy what would I know - You’re correct in your skill issue.!!! less than 10ft accuracy in bombing.! Doubt youd get much closer.!
Nope as I specifically mentioned that SACLOS missiles can defeat helicopters and no other type of spaa has it’s same effectiveness. You seem to disagree.
Only thunderskill gives out that warning and even then it is not a deceleration. There is definitely a correlation between a vehicle’s performance and the vehicle’s statistics (how players perform in it). The most obvious example is the Sovetsky Soyuz which has the highest KD of 7.2 and the 2nd best being the Iowa which has a KD of 4.6 while having more spawns total yet still having less total kills than the Sovetsky.
Again, like I said for the millionth time, this can be seen how big of a KD difference there is between the Z-10 and Z-10ME. Your “trusted” player also proves me right.
1 Like
you really believe that ru forum post, that ERA wouldn’t detonate at APFSDS hitting it at 68 degrees?
Yes, it’s abusing the limit of sensitivity they can get away with due to not wanting it to trigger on impact of smaller calibers, and yet needing to function quickly in response to a High Energy impact.
Basically the sharper the tip the lower the radial velocity because for the same displacement, as it occurs over a longer distance and so stays below this limit not setting off the plate, effectively bypassing the ERA tile.
1 Like
Almost 2k posts so is there russian bias or not im confused at this point gamers.
There has been at some point through out the life of this game american bias, german bias, russian bias, and insert ___ nation bias. For every accusation of russian bias, I can point out US bias that happened some point in this game and vise versa.
The question is where are we now? That entirely depends on what gamemode you’re playing (ground, air or sea) and what br bracket you’re talking about.
2 Likes
sea is 110% USSR bias right now
im not super caught up on ground but i think it still favors Sweden and Germany
air favors France and now Eurofighter nations
No. That is filled up last.
1 Like
I have said this again in other similar topics too…
if you type “war thunder Bias” on GOOGLE the vast majority of results you get is this…
on youtube…
Here in this forum…
So either this is mass delusion , empathy etc or its just real …its up to you to decide by playing the game and figuring out by experience what is normal or not, for me the vast majority shows something…
It has become a meme for good players and a strawman for players that don’t want to accept that they have a skill issue
How come to mostly players scream Russian bias even tho they never played Russia?
9 Likes
X nation bias is mostly just a coping mechanism for bad players, which the game has plenty of. Besides that there is also a group of people just meming on it.
Gaijin just decides which nation they want to be powerful every now and then, there is no inherent bias towards any nation specifically.
3 Likes
I lie repeated a thousand times is still a lie.
1 Like
You seem to be yet another guy that says RU bias is real while not being able to prove it with your in game performance, how weird is that ?
6 Likes
I guess that the same players that you say have not played other nations too but they scream mainly about russia as the majotity indicates…I wonder why…
same as a true thing said a thousand times is still a true thing…
Exactly, it seems that there is a majority out on social media and forums that talking about RU bias and the only way for someone to prove it (or to prove the opposite) requires official game data that is impossible for someone to provide thats why i said to ‘‘Sternlos’’ to play the game and to figure out himself if there is or not RU bias by the experience he will get.
I wish, some people take game files datamine with writing “This is not in game value ammo explosion is determined by server data” and start using it like legitimate proof that T-80BVM has less chance of ammo combustion this is absolutley hillarious.
1 Like
I mean, this could easily be explained by the tech tree being one of the biggest ones in terms of player count, you’re naturally going to face way more of those vehicles. If you instead do searches in the Russian language you’re likely going to get way more results about “American/German bias” as those are the other two largest played tech trees.
I’m not claiming either side here is correct, just pointing out that there are alternative explanations.
Russian bias (which partially also applies to China because they use Soviet tech) is flat nosed APBC shells and top tier armor package.
FN APBC overperform against flat armor, against screens on angles, and have overperforming ricochet angles.
Armor packages of modern tanks overperform due to incorrect textolite protection, being almost half as strong as steel, rather than 1/45 of it. But that’s made rather for Russian tanks having dogshit reverse speed, low survivability and slow firerate. Meanwhile Soviet WW2 flat-nosed shells overperform for no reason, Soviet tanks would be good enough without it. (but IS-2 wouldnt even penetrate Jumbo or Panther UFP, cri-cri-cri)
Well at this moment RU segment is quite silent for now in comparison with times when F-14A was a big thing maybe after July people will start ot wake up.
I would bet that armor package in top tier still works as homogenous armor not like multilayered.
1 Like