Removing the possibly of seeing 12.0 tanks in your MM is irrelevant? I need what you are smoking brother. And 3bm60 is not gonna change things much, you arent magicslly lolpenning things or changing where you can shoot or even want to in most cases over 3mb4x.
1 Like
You don’t think giving a tank a top tier round wont change anything…No friend I want what you are smoking.
Unlike Russia Britain don’t have a million other 10.3-10.7 tanks you have the Cr1 mk3, Vickers Mk7 and the T-90S that is it.
Both the Vickers and the Cr1 have L26 a far better round
If a good round doesn’t matter remove the 3BM60 from game then? You can pen enough with 3BM42…I’m sure other Russian mains would agree with you.
Having to face tanks that 3BM42 doesn’t reliably work on is a challenge. It struggles vs M1 AIMs and Click Baits yet faces them regularly. Leopard 2A5 and above. 3BM42 is a short rod penetrator and in game acts as such
If it came with a BR decrease yes please.
So any br tank lfp and breach/abrams ring are immune to 3bm42? Thats news to me. Please tell me why you are shooting anywhere else in a game where the average engagement range is 400m and you have mouse aim.
1 Like
And if you cant see the turret ring or lower front plate?
Again if you don’t need a better round because weak spots are so simple to hit why have better penetrating rounds in game?
Then all you can see is the turret cheeks, which 3bm60 isnt penning, and you are better off loading heat to try and bonk them. If you cant even see their gun breach or barrel they arent shooting you either so you can also wait.
Better rounds dont mean a whole lot at higher brs unless you are using auto canons and the margins for pens are slimmer. You arent finding yourself in situations like t34 85 vs king tiger in uptiers, Armor and better rounds stop mattering nearly as much as gun handling and mobility which is where russian tanks suffer the most.
And Im not saying I have god aim or insticts, every match pretty much I have shots where im asking myself why am I so bad? I imagine a lot of players instead blame the round or think the tank they are shooting is OP instead of blaming themselves for a poor shot and you’ll never get better at the game doing that.
I cant think of any situation at 9.7+ where you are in even a full uptier and cant pen lfp/breach of anything you face, you always have options, this isnt ww2 brs.
1 Like
Yeah but adding a missile like the KH38MT that doesnt exist and then completely ignore the tons of bug reports and proof it didnt exist is Bias. Making the AGM114L a IR FNF missile would make absolute sense. considering, Spikes and PARs missiles exist.
1 Like
Zero bug reports have been made with proof of Kh-38MT program cancellation.
Also AH-64E can use SPIKEs.
1 Like
Not true i made one and it was instantly taken down with no reason lol im sure thats whats happening. I did a ton of research into the whole thing there isnt any real proof they exist as they do in this game. KH38MLs definitely existed and plenty of proof there for them.
the reason was a lake of sources
then you should have definitive prove, black on white, that the 38mt was cancled
also didnt knew you had acces to the russian military archives to look there, because that is the only place where you would find a definitive answer on the kh38
1 Like
Buddy what are you even saying, the bishma doesnt face leopard 2a5s as it is 12.0… also the 3bm42 is not a short rod either IRL or in game.
1 Like
Oooh, you mean the Shvak? The fast firing pea shooter? Whats the problem there?
???
Yes, this is historically correct. What is the issue here?
Uh, proof?
Well, the community voted AGAINST APHE changes lol. (and every nation more or less has APHE; is this bias too?)
Proof?
Uh, the AMX-50, SOMUA SM, AMX-40 TOA-100, etc all have extremely good armour that bounces shells. And they can pen anything they face…
But it still gets an ATGM, no? This is CLEARLY bias.
2S25 has a 4s reload? Obj 906 is 4.3 and has only APHE, HE and HEAT-FS. 2S38 has an autocannon…
Yes, something we can agree on
Overrated
???
76mm HEAT-FS… a fart does more damage than it can… and it can be .50 cal’d frontally lmao. Its so slow too.
you cant prove a program that didnt exist past a mockup was cancelled
Then you haven’t read cancellation documents.
when a program doesnt exist past ordering a modeling company to produce a mockup and someone to write 2 lines in an existing brochure there will never be cancellation documents because there was nothing to cancel
to demand cancellation documents you need to prove that the program progressed to a point where they would exist
1 Like
ok but how do we know that the non existence of cancellation documents means that the missile exists and is not cancelled versus there just arent any cancellation documents because it didnt even get that far?
3BM42 is fine at 10.7, it’s far from being the worst one there.
No it isn’t.
if they had canceled it, they wouldnt have advertised it on the chinsese airshow last year
do we have confirmation that brochure is from last year
it looked very dated
