So is it American/US bias to play any game made by American Devs?
It absolutely does exist in some form, it just isn’t in the “making their jets better than everybody elses’ form.” It absolutely does verifiably and undeniably exist in the form of “we will fix things faster if ussr” or “we will only add new features if they can go on ussr vehicles too” or other similar more subtle things
2 Likes
osa isnt that good
This boils down to the USSR being a major nation, plus there are a lot of unfixed Russian vehicles.
Very subtle. The major one I can think of is spall liners.
The only forms of Russian bias I can agree on is the Pantsir. KH-38MT’s maybe, however the CAS field has been somewhat leveled now.
Any bias is bad, whether it is Russian, American, or anyone else’s.
1 Like
Faster than OTHER major nations.
Such as? Go on.
Spall liners, auto tracking by IFV guns, SPAA additions in “sky guardians” where ussr receives 3 in one patch while USA waits until literally 2025 to see their equivalence, etc. I can also throw in the current fiasco where they decided mega nerfing the abrams and leopard was mandatory while they piddle around probably waiting 6 months to nerf the russians in the same way. Watch and see.
1 Like
You wanted the Russian tanks to get their autoloader modelled, and it did.
Now when your tanks get the same treatment all you do is complain. Pathetic.
1 Like
Name some examples.
For example, the T-72/90 series of tanks have their autoloaders modelled too high.
IFV IRST, subtle. I mentioned SPAA. The Abrams and Leopard still clear the top tier Russian tanks.
1 Like
Sure, but I don’t see any bias with USSR vehicles in this game.
I’m going to ask you this once, and one time only. Capiche?
I am very clearly not some anti-russian player. I advocate for russia constantly in game. You KNOW this because 100+ likes from YOU specifically on MY comments. You coming here and saying I’m somehow being biased is pathetic and goes against all civility between us previously established.
As far as the CONTENT of the conversation…
The russian autoloader change where they made it where it can be disabled? This is not equivalent to what they did to the Abrams and Leopard. They are separate mechanics. The Russian tanks are currently ADVANTAGED (read: they SHOULD have this nerf as WELL but DO NOT) in that they DIDN’T get nerfed but WILL in the future. Do not lower your own intelligence or insult mine by trying to pretend this somehow means the USA and Germany wins here.
Very minor thing compared to all of their beneficial bugs/issues. This was a weak example.
What are you trying to say here? genuinely confused, I have already said that the ways they do it are subtle.
Not related to the issue at hand.
That was the first one on my mind.
What i’m trying to get at is that small features like these aren’t proof of Russian bias.
Do I agree with these new module changes? No. However them implementing it on just the Abrams and Leo isn’t Russian bias. I would say Russian bias if every MBT except the Russian ones got these modules.
1 Like
Having a turret rotation mechanism destroyed still allows you to shoot and so on, though. Those two tanks can easily maneuver out of danger; T-series tanks cannot. I admit the modelling for the turret rotation is wonky and needs a rework, especially if they plan to implement it to other tanks
If you destroy the autoloader, you’ll only be able to shoot if you have a shell loaded, and then its a 35s repair (based on my crew stats). I think they should model this for all autoloader tanks for every nation in this case
My apologies for going off at you, I just didn’t read your username and honestly I’m just fed up with people (not you) who seem to think Gaijin loves Russia and think everything that happens to them is Russian Bias…
In your opinion. This is literally just a game of “how much are you willing to take?” and you are willing to take more than I to claim the difference in nations. It’s very clear they see subtle bias in regards like this. It all adds up constantly to form a sour experience for other nations often.
The only thing you can argue is that it’s also not hurting the minor nations currently, but they specifically targetted the least complained about MBT (abrams, regarding facing it), and the Leopard 2s to nerf rather than just waiting for this to be ready for every tank. You would never see them doing this to a russian tank first and waiting for western tanks. In fact, I’d love for you to think up a single time this has happened.
1 Like
They targeted the 2 most played MBT’s in the game, as well as the 2 most powerful ones. This mainly shows Gaijin’s hesitancy to properly decompress top tier and balance them through the BR system.
Russian and Western tanks are very different by design, and so I wouldn’t be surprised as to examples being rare. The autoloaders were implemented far, far before these advanced module changes.
1 Like
Under no metric, ever, from any source, does the abrams end up being #2 in the game.
2 Likes
The current implementation of the turret basket for the abrams is pure fantasy so why bring up real life technical aspects? Many US tankers have stepped forward and said its nonsense to have the turret damaged by basket hits.
1 Like
Abrams outdoes the Challenger, Ariete, Merkava, T-90M, T-80BVM, ZTZ99A, VT4A1, WZ1001, Leclerc, and Type 10/TKX.
The only vehicle it loses out to are the Strv 122’s/Leopard 2’s. The closest vehicle is the T-80BVM in performance, which has one advantage, armor.
It has a worse reload, reverse, shell, depression, the list goes on.
2 Likes
I gave you your example.
There are only 3 main nations in the game, these are the USA, USSR and Germany, all other nations in the battle make up 0.5%. The French, Italians, etc. are not the main force. So even if the French are given the Death Star, it does not change anything at all.
1 Like