So 2-3 less guys on the map defending the objectives and stopping enemies from flanking and spawn killing every single AA there is ?
My point still stands, something like 64E can’t be effectively countered by Pantsir, as ammo advantage will always be on the side of the helicopter, and getting killed at 16km away from a SACLOS missile in a helicopter with MAWs is just one of the worst plays in the history.
It’s extremely potent against planes and can easily shoot them down without the fear of getting notched or MP’d.
It’s effectiveness against LDIRCM helicopters is slightly worse than Pantsir’s (as it’s effectively useless), so you pretty much get two in one.
Stop using winrate to prove a TT got bias or not, is not relevant because the winrate of certain BR is decided by the premium vehicles’ number. When you got a whole lineup of premium vehicle means there are more new players on this BR which means they gonna become prey by experienced players, thus the winrate is low. Like France for a long time they just lack top tier premium and for exchange they got the most highest skill player at toptier which getting high winrate, but can this mean France vehicle is OP? No! The Leclerc is not bad but also not the best of the best MBT in the game.
Players of minor nations have less influence on their winrate than players of major nations. 1-2 French players in a team have a much weaker influence on winning a match than 8-10 American players in the same team. Their win rate is too strongly influenced by the current trends with which major nations they play more often in this patch.
Therefore, it is better to compare the minors only with the minors and the majors only with the majors.
While I wholeheartedly agree, China is quickly becoming more of a major nation, at high tiers especially.
I see on average far more al-khalids and ZTZ/VT series tanks than ever before, and their playerbase is growing by the day.
One day china could surpass germany or russia in player count, especially as more advanced domestic vehicled are added.
90% of the criticism linked with the ‘russian bias’ mantra comes from clear discrepancies in how high tier russian equipment is treated compared to anyone else, and despite all the cries of the contrary, there are undeniable cases where russia has recieved special treatment (Old carousel and bvm not spalling, Pantsir, Vikhr, KA-50/2 and their controversies, relikt being dubious, KH-38MTs and recently the BUK and LMUR respectively)
Nothing proves that premium vehicles have lower stats such as WR or K/D just because they are premium.
Most of the time their stats are in line with their TT counterparts.
ool seem to not realize that the BUK would be way stronger if gaijin gavce it SARH missiles, with the BUK being able to guide multiple SARH missiles at once
gaijin just gave the BUK ARH missiles so they dont have to model the ability of guiding multiple SARH missiles at differetn targets
No, the difference is not the vehicle stats but the person that play them. Lets say they all got full lineup, you think 5 lvl 50 players can win the match against 5 lvl 100 players at top tier? That is the main element for the winrate, thus using winrate to define whether a TT is bias is not relevant. More low level players at toptier is the reason why Russia or any TT toptier winrate so low