My best performing aircraft are Sea Vixen, Gripen, P51H5NA, F-18A…
My best performing tanks are Jagdpanzer IV, KV-1E, M4A2, M6A1, Stuart VI, Black Prince, T26E5, Conqueror, Leopard 2PL, PzIvG, Lago I, EBR 1954, M4A4, AMX-50 Foch, another M4A4, KV-1 ZiS-5, Turan III, M4A5, AMX-13-M24, PT-76-57 when it was 7.7, Object 279, Tiger H1, KV-122, Matilda Hedgehog, ZTZ-96…
Out of all of those vehicles, 4 are Soviet, and 1 isn’t the BR I performed that at anymore.
And the Soviet stuff is at best on-par with other vehicles I’ve played.
Sea Vixen is my most well played vehicle of all time. A missile-only fighter-interceptor that I pre-ordered faster than Black Prince.
I do understand those - anybody in europe understands those you guy. I think its funny how u use latin in a thread like this to look smarter. You don’t. Using lation quotas in a thread like this is over the top. Your’re not proving anything using those.
great thatnk you,
go play and come back in 5 years. play random br’s.
have thousands of battles and see for yourself.
bye
fun fact - there will be a time when you will get all this. And you will do the ‘Oh’ LIKE ALL OF US.
You just need to realllly play a lot and collect more data. Play A LOT MORE. this thread is not for you … yet.
This is exactly what I wrote to you. You just don’t get it yet. I didn’t use latin because it’s over the top in a thread like this. doesnt make you look smarter at all.
It’s only obvious to some because they are experiencing a lot of confirmation bias. I have also played many games in air and ground, and have played with and against various Russian vehicles.
There is no sweeping bias towards any one nation, just bias towards money, and whatever vehicles Gaijin chooses to help.
there definitely does seem to be some bias in additions to the game, eg russia not having the best AA for a patch is apparently too long so they add a BUK with fictional radar missiles
another good example is NCTR, it was only added to the game when there was a russian plane that had it, and currently no US planes have the ability to tell anything more than if it is single engine or not despite evidence that at least some should get more information
or how about LDIRCM being added to a russian heli already in game and one new heli when many other helis already in game could have it added
What was annoying was when the ammo rack bug existed and I never experienced it, I thought the claims were pure paranoia because they never claimed it was a bug but instead intentional.
I never experienced ammo not cooking off, so it took a video of someone showing me what it was like and my first thought was “That looks like a bug.”
If people didn’t hell “Russian bias” all the time I would’ve considered that sooner and done a better job listening to people.
Soviet vehicles in my experience playing the game have been no different than facing anything else.
The first thing I did when I found out War Thunder has accurate damage systems was start using the x-ray tool to memorize crew and ammo positions in tanks.
After volumetric was added I then started learning to avoid roof armor.
@Alpharius11348
Pantsir can only deal with LGBU carriers, as proven by Excalibur and others.
So yes, Soviets did need an equivalent SPAA to everyone else. Fairness and balance matters more than hatred.
NCTR was added because it’s a feature on many aircraft including Rafale, Su-30SM, Mirage 20005F, F-15E/I, Baz Meshupar, Gripen, F-18, Typhoon, F-2A, F-15JM, etc. It’s not exclusive to Soviets, and many of those jets have 51 types identifiable.
Mi-28NM is quite literally “one of the helis in-game that should already have it” before it was added. No Russian bias there, either. It also didn’t add any unique functionality other than give them a reason to fix standard DIRCM in the future when they can.
it was added the same update as the su30m which is coincidentally the first russian plane that could get it despite many planes able to have it already in game
yes so why did they only add it to Mi28NM and none of the other helis that should have it that were already in the game, if they wanted it to be balanced they would add it to at least on heli that could in each nation but they ignored that to give a russian heli a significant advantage over everyone else
But those are things that where there with the 2s38 and not with the hstvl.
Then why add one like AA and the other one as a light? lol
Bro, Kh29´s are faster and has more explosive than any maverick, making them more efective.
Yeah, that was my bad SORRY, ONLY REMEMBERING WHEN ONLY 3 NATIONS (one of them russia) HAD AN AA ABLE TO ENGAGE OVER 8 KM WHEN THE RANGE OF VIKHRS WHERE 10.
Yes, they need it but where is the “Fairness and balance” when the AA that is comming have faster missiles than any other one, has better damage even on the ground due to the splash damage and can operate even without the radar vehicle? And again, that nation also has the best CAS already.
Edit: Also is going to be better at close distances due the directional launch.
Features are added when they are finished.
Kh-38MT and Hammer are supposed to function via programmable LOAL, not like AGM-65D’s direct lock.
Mig-21SMT and MF have ECM pods that aren’t usable.
4x F/A-18s came into the game with it as well that update, and vehicles from previous updates were given the feature.
LDIRCM was added to the helicopters that have it integrally, and that will include AH-64E as well.
Those that use it as pods… well refer to Mig-21SMT, or even integral ECM.
And yes, I know Gaijin is working on ECM cause they told us.
@_Pool
Because artificially nerfing 2S38 with light tank spawn points was a good decision. Also that’s 100% irrelevant to ammo storage.
Kh-29s cannot lock until you are dead by a Roland 3… they are not better than Mavericks.
Again Soviets haven’t had good SPAA to deal with top CAS since prior to LGBUs.
People forget that ADATS, Tunguska, etc were added to deal with hellicopters, which made playing CAS at top BR impossible. Granted LBGUs from supersonic aircraft wasn’t the answer either.
The 2s38 is to the hstvl as the f5e is to the f16 adf.
The hstvl is simply a better light tank when it comes to ground combat, Having depression and a better round (while very squirrely against sloped armour)
The 2s38 is a better multi role support tank however, able to generally take on more opponents over a longer time due to its ammo capacity and better fire rate.
(imo the 2s38 should be bout 11.0ish sense its its firepower is relatively the same.{Trading pen for firerate.} With only its larger size, lack of depression, and MBT type mobility holding it back.)
