Medal for what, dishing out slurs or ranting in public chat?
My man it was a joke, besides there are people that have chat ban for basically nothing and ones that aren’t banned despite writing really bad things.
But who cares what is happening in chat? Sometimes people will shit on each other and sometimes there will be something that will be funny or uplifting. Let people be people.
1 Like
Idc personally, and i’m not the type to report people, but 99% of chatbans come from blatantly racist or wild stuff said in chats
1 Like
The guy (BazieStook) doesn’t need a chat ban to discredit anything, his arguments and stats already do that perfectly fine lol.
1 Like
I would say less in percentage. You can also be chat banned for jokes or being based or criticize GJ or other things that people don’t want you to criticize.
Let him do his thing, even if you disagree, we all here should test what is biased not by comparing virtual dicks and useless stats but by actually testing things in battles by competent and smart players.
But even then there is a problem with testing but I can’t say it.
1 Like
Z10ME
Ah64E
Please tell me what helicopters currently ingame could get LDIRCM
The Buk is anything but the best Sam
I would have died there to the SAMP-T, CAMM or IRIS-T for example
The Buk would probably be way better if it gave it the Sarh missiles since Sarh missiles are harder to evade in warthunder and the Buk is able to guide multiple missiles at different targets at the same time
Wrong it was added after there were already a few Russian planes that could have had it, the Mig29smt and the Su34
It was added the update after the Eurofighter and rafale were added two prominent planes that have NCTR
And after it was bug reported for both of them and it was released as a feature right as more NCTR capable planes were released and before the release of the F-2 which also has full NCTR.
1 Like
I ve done it…
First 60 tanks by games:
RUS 21 tanks average win rate 46.29% - average K/D Ratio 0,948
GER 22 tanks average win rate 45.11% - average K/D Ratio 0,928
USA 16 tanks average win rate 45.95% - average K/D Ratio 0,821
SWE 1 tank
Russia still best stats despite having such ‘‘bad’’ tanks as you describe …isn’t that bizarre ?
1 Like
Statshark doesn’t agree with you.
Or they are banning people with infantile behavior.
Yes, now compare this to your initial claim where you were looking at vehicles with highest K/D in the game.
RU still having margin of error difference in stats to other two major nations, but you’re still here claiming bias is real throughout the tiers.
Some people like to shut down their own arguments. Actually bizarre behavior lol.
It’s actually becoming a fact that the worse you are at the game, the more you believe in conspiracies that are planned to sabotage your gameplay. Looks convenient not going to lie.
yes if i compare them the conclusion is :
- Best 60 tanks by K/D ratio Russia is the best by far
- 60 most played tanks average winrate ratio russia again the best
- 60 most played tanks average K/D ratio Russia again the best
and all these by a country with ‘’ bad’’ tanks…or maybe they are not but some russian mains just try to descibe them as they are …
I surely can agree to this…:})
It’s actually becoming a fact that when you lack of talking points, putting conspiracy theories believer labels to people you disagree is the most convenient, im not going to lie either… :)
horrifying, this is GORE, this should be CENSORED!
is that not a feature ingame right now?
1 Like
Most of which are obscure vehicles that were event ones a decade ago. As I said, it proves RU got the most event vehicles back in the day.
46.29% vs 45.95%
Bias confirmed.
0.948 vs 0.928
Bias confirmed.
They are decent tanks.
Also, your data shows how a country that supposedly have help from malicious bias coding throughout the tiers have stats within the margin of error of others. Funny how the propaganda vehicles aren’t so dominant after looking at stats.
You proved yourself wrong buddy, it’s actually hilarious at this point.
So far you haven’t put out any concrete evidence of bias, and everything you’ve presented is nothing more than personal experience/opinion. Millions of games worth of stats don’t show any bias, but yet here you are, still adamant it’s real.
I guess you haven’t took into the account the most probable thing, that this bias thing is all in your head. How about you ask yourself that for once ?
Nope you can only take vhikers on the outer pylons
Or any guided A2G missile for that matter
just in terms of US helicopters: AH-64D, AH-1Z, AH-6M, and probably MH-60
1 Like
They might actually fix ldircm if they add it to the usa. So maybe in a year or 2
AH64E aleady has it in game???
Oh does it? i havn’t seen the dev server yet so i assumed lol
Margin of error stats proves nothing.
Win rates are team skill and proves nothing about tanks.
@Alpharius11348
AH-64D’s is a pod.
AH-1Z’s is likely not ready.
AH-6M doesn’t have the modules modeled in-game, and the one image of it with it posted didn’t have the RWR modules. The in-game one does have an RWR.
MH-60 doesn’t have the sensors in-game and I haven’t found pictures.
And as i said this is an aspect of ‘‘russian bias’’ since there wasn’t an equality in quantity and quality of the given premiums / event vehicles among the nations from the first time.
Ofcourse bias is confirmed if we believe you saying how ‘’ bad ‘’ Russian tanks are…then how on earth they have even slightly the higher winrate and K/D ratio among the big 3 ?
Two answers:
- GJN making them overperform in many ways …
- They are indeed very good tanks and you just have some ‘‘opinion issues’’ …
Few posts later … (after SS data doesnt comply with what you said)
I bet that if i continue processing SS data they ‘ll become for you ‘’ very good tanks’’ after some posts …
The only concrete evidence that you could believe is an official announcement of GJN admiting Russian Bias in the game and again im not sure of it…
1 Like
Just like it’s bias when Germany received a whole lineup of fakes back in the day ?
Never said they are bad.
So do point me to the bias when looking at the stats, as I can’t see it.
You have some language issues I see.
As I said, you’re basing all of your bias claims on personal opinions and experiences.
I’m inclined to not believe in stuff like “waaah my bomb didn’t kill a RU tank, bias confirmed”, as those things happen on pretty much every tank/nation.
If RU vehicles were some propaganda, bias machines that’d definitely show in stats. Guess what, it doesn’t.