we need to segregate this forum based on stats seriously.
2k posts from people who never touched russia, sadge.
2 Likes
Could try a suggestion post? Though gl on getting one through.
why waste my time on a topic that will get locked in 10 minutes haha
3 Likes
@ExcaliburSniper
Prove that tripod and I have no clue how LDIRCM works, I’ll wait.
All your posts do is defend Russia…
1 Like
This would depend on the sensor, and the detector material, Russia can definitely produce an array with the correct sensitivities to detect a projectile while it’s motor was burning and / or it was supersonic. but I’d need to know more about the specific installation, and its a different matter entirely if they could keep it functional in service.
For these systems, all it would really care about is if it is tracking the aircraft it is attached to, which can be resolved by assessing apparent angular rate as Constant Bearing, Decreasing range, can freely be assumed to hold for practically all relevant IR guided threats (potentially an exception for the MICA-IR or ASRAAM, due to known advanced guidance algorithms). and jamming success can be determined again by an increase in apparent angular rate.
Well if it’s wired into the RWR, it’s a simple step be able to see if the IR track corresponds to a emission signature, and further the spike’s current mode indicates that a missile might be guiding.
Another thing is that there is no limitation the projected waveform (and the optimal, effective waveform itself depends on the threat) between, Coherent (laser / active) and Incoherent(omni directional / passive) systems. The fact that gaijin thinks they work differently isn’t actually based on anything other than “gaming conventions”.
The only difference is the amount of radiated power and thus effective range of the system, simply due to the fact that the laser concentrates the radiated power into a much smaller zone, which is cued by whatever sensors.
Also it’s pretty blatant that the President-S should only work against 1st, 2nd & 3rd gen threats.
If you say so, it doesn’t make him wrong.
2 Likes
Im gonna assume the one on the MI is the L-370-5 right?
Really old brochure way before they started producing in mass bareley a proof.
Russia can produce a narrow FOV camera that could detect a coasting missile but not without knowing exactly where to look first. A wide or 360 IR cam would have too many false positives and no range information. That’s why MAWS primarily looks for UV to filter out false positives. It’s near impossible to detect an incoming missile otherwise even in ideal conditions.
Fair point on the data fusion aspect but Russia is so far behind in that domain… doubtful.
1 Like
Are you seriously denying the contents of a sales brochure, say it isn’t so.
Besides if it wasn’t enough, the Kh-38T would be in trouble wouldn’t it.
1 Like
@ExcaliburSniper telling everyone to ignore tripod and I cause we agree is hilarious. You make yourself look like a Russian fanboy, and yes I’m calling you out because all you’ve done is claim tripod’s results are wrong without providing evidence. All because I and others have defended non-Russian equipment.
We get it, you seem to hate everything America and NATO. Now move along.
And if you secretly don’t hate everything America and NATO, then stop antagonizing those of us that are trying to make vehicles and weapon systems more accurate.
1 Like
You can get range & range rate from kinematic ranging, or by estimating the output of a Kalman filter, based on approximating the change in intensity of a track.
1 Like
IRIS-T is also russian bias, why russians always have the most op SPAA ?
Then there is Rafale, clearly russian bias.
2A7 also proofs how busted russia is, best tank for more than a year.
5 Likes
Kinematic ranging would be for a ground target. I don’t see how a Kalman filter could get you range and closing speed without knowing the diameter of the missile, which varies a lot and would be much harder than detection.
@Ghost_of_TelAviv love seeing russian mains seethe because 2/6 of their Kh38 get intercepted. Meanwhile they can’t intercept slow af Hammers and still struggle against 2A7 because they never had to aim before.
Don’t worry I’m sure gaijin will add a new AA so poor russia can catch up. Pantsir for 2 years = ok. IrisT for 3 months = unacceptable.
2 Likes
@ExcaliburSniper
Soviets have not had a competitive SPAA since early 2022 back when CAS range wasn’t 14km or more.
Pantsir was and still is bad against IR AGM carriers which aren’t even the weapon to use anymore because of the new SPAA. I bullied Pantsirs since their introduction cause of how inadequate they are against IR AGM carriers.
There were many matches where I’d notice 3 or more Pantsirs up, and I’d mock their inability to frag aircraft by buzzing them within 3 - 5km at low altitude while I was waiting for enemy CAS to spawn.
Not only that but Soviets aren’t getting new CAS powercreep, no one is. Gaijin stated explicitly that there will be no CAS powercreep for a while after the new SPAA is in the game.
Speculative, that means Winter would be the soonest, and that’d at most be HARMs in my opinion.
I however do not expect new CAS powercreep until next year entirely.
Also could you please provide evidence of USSR rounds being better than NATO rounds for their BR on average?
I’d love you to counter any of the criticisms against Soviet equipment provided here.
All I see is claims without evidence.
Its not just Russian Bias… its also China Bias too, on top of that, British players are punished, having very poor choices of vehicles that can barely do any damage, take any damage and overall performance is pretty bad too.
Ngl i made the mistake of putting money into this game when i first joined as it seemed to me like that was neccesary to have a fighting chance at least but now i have to say i have regret
I am not a Russian main and barely played Russia for over a year.
Nice try.
5 Likes
only a russian main would bitch and moan about the 2a7 or french AGMs when we still have fictitious kh38s in the game that can be launched from the runway with NLOS, or god mode helis.
i don’t stat stalk cause i’m not a hypocrite or a russian main but it’s beyond obvious
Unlike you, i played all of them.
7 Likes
All his posts do is demonize people that dare criticize Russian equipment.
The last tank I got in Soviets was their “new” artillery.
Though I did add the Mig-21S to my wishlist because it’s featured in MGS3 Snake Eater.
I have none of the new SPAA, and no new MBTs added since T-90M [there was only one added so far].
All thanks to there not being Warsaw vs NATO anymore so I can actually play any tech tree with my Soviet main friends.
@ExcaliburSniper
For Kh-38MTs to launch, they need direct line of sight, which means the launch aircraft was launched on by Spyder, CLAWS, or SLM and quickly died.
Doesn’t really seem like it