Then tell me how i am sealclubbing please.
1 Like
I don’t see any conduit or electrical wiring either. How would damage to the Turret basket cause issues with the electrical system?
And besides It’s not like the Turret would also have a protective basket encapsulating the Autoloader affixed to the Turret right, not unlike the M1’s basket?
Its destruction caused many deaths considering how often it got damaged from shots that happened nowhere near the actual model, you can hit the turret cheeks, or “Doghouse” (main sight complex) and it still dies, it was especially common before the Enhanced module locations for the M1 were deployed, as there was little else to eat the spall, I know @Necrons31467 had a series of M1 penetrations that were especially prominent, as in 5 of the 6 or so shots to the turret also disabled the “pump” module.
That module literally also acts as part of the turret drives, so with it destroyed the Turret can’t be traversed, which means its almost impossible to even get a 2nd shot off at a target, assuming that the crew and / or turret basket were to somehow also survive.
Yes? What else could I possibly be referring to? Are you going to tell me there would be any eventuality where it not being aligned with the gun breach would be useful?
Thus as part of the autoloading module, why should its jammed bearing (due to module damage) permit the gun Breach (and thus the rest of the turret) to move out of alignment? Considering that the rotation mechanisms clearly lack the requisite degree of freedom.
It’s literally stated to be the intent of the changes by Gaijin, don’t forget;
First to the point of why we’re introducing the baskets to the horizontal aiming drives. From a gameplay and design standpoint, the current damage model (without the basket, with more empty space under the turret) penalizes players who hit the center of mass area where there is nothing to damage, even though they did everything right and landed a shot in this area.
~
From our perspective, we want to avoid penalizing the player who managed to land a shot on the enemy first, reducing those frustrating moments of penetrating a vehicle without doing any meaningful damage — even though the round passed through a significant amount of the interior.
There was no actual reason provided as to why there should be an arbitrary link between the Turret basket and Turret drives, and as evidenced by the Pump layout, already existed, just in a slightly smaller form factor.
Simply to account for the Shooter’s poor aim.
Why? The thermals aren’t even that good, what at 11.3~12.0 doesn’t have Thermals?
2 Likes
2A7 is the only seal clubber at top tier.
2 Likes
Not saying you are, just that that’s what you’re after since you can’t recognize even basic imbalance in the game caused by bias. This really shouldn’t be that confusing
Oh seems to be i missed that change.
Why ? Both turret and autoloader rotate seperatley top cover of the autoloader being a module that can be damaged is already questionable now you wan’t to effect turret rotation which sounds like really special treatment not in a good way while turret bottom of the abrams contains tubes with fluid.
So they just put T series, Abrams and Leo on one level ?
2 Likes
Your most played vehicles happens to be Leopard 2, do you feel fair fighting against something the likes of challenger, ariete or vt4? In what universe they are equal?
4 Likes
When other nations are doing it it’s no biggie.
When RU is doing it it’s bias.
You need to remember that.
4 Likes
I haven’t played Germany much in recent years, which is why i have way fewer battles in VJTF and 2A7.
Got nothing better to do than stalk a man’s stats because you lost an argument?
It’s not the "top cover’ only what they are modeling with the module changes, with the coming update, as seen below.
The Drives are fed though a slip ring, in the turret race, not though the firewall into the hull, the Sump tank stores excess, low pressure fluid as a reserve (the fluid’s temperature influences the total volume so excess needs to be stored). It can additionally be isolated from the main supply in battle conditions to reduce the likelihood of a failed valve or leak / puncture from causing the working pressure to drop.
To the degree to which they can, sure. but to deliberately exclude one for no reason is strange, no? especially where they can’t actually point to sources to back up the arbitrary changes they are making.
Is the argument in the room with us now ?
2 Likes
You couldn’t read a post I made with 100 words I don’t expect you to read 10 pages of replies
Okay but what connection this makes with autoloader damage effect on turret rotation ?
Emmm no ? When devs decided to redesign missile first was tunguska and every one else later
1 Like
Because the autoloader’s Rammer is fixed in it’s alignment with the Breach (as seen in the prior linked gif above some motive elements are obviously directly affixed to the Breach, on the T-72 / T-90 reference, stub ejection mechanism may be similarly attached for the T-64 / T-80 version) and must interface with the carousel to function. If said bearing are jammed due to damage; thus how can the turret rotate independently?
Except that this is backwards, where others were first and this is catching those not yet impacted up. While omitting a key change that was made that directly conflicts with their stated goals for the basis underpinning the intent of the change(s) made.
it’s not like they decided to not have said changes impact the ADATS because ??? (e.g. the MIM-146 is an ATGM, not a SAM). Also it’s been more than one update since the changes went live, and prior to that more than a year where they were publicly acknowledged as part of the 2024 roadmap.
You persistence on building strawman is something to see.
1 Like
Your ability to similarly dodge answering basic questions is just as impressive.
No seriously how many times you just replaced some ones thesis ?
1 Like
And please, only respond if you can actually formulate an argument, or explanation. Not just hurl invectives into the void.
It’s hardly on topic, is it.
Lmao. Just because you try to look up extravagant words in a dictionary doesn’t mean you know how to use them.
Since you won’t rewrite what you put, I’ll note it as void and null.
1 Like
Have you ever stopped and considered, that others might have a wider grasp on the English language than you do? Besides, these scary “big words” tend to convey, both an explicit modality and context far better than I could do otherwise.
Besides it’s not a dictionary that would be useful, it would be a thesaurus for your accused case since I’d need to know a word exists (and how to spell it) to find it in a dictionary.
Also my use of grammar is trash, I know this. I’d never get it past the copy editor.
So you agree you have poor grammar, but try school me saying my reading comprehension is terrible? Oh okay lol
1 Like