Russian Bias in 2025?

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

So did the US or the Soviet Union collapse? Who won the Cold War?

2 Likes

Gotta love the US main falling for the weakest bait and just commit friendly fire and just go off rail when you hurt their feeling (Literally the mildest shit ever)

2 Likes

Mexico.

I knew it.

It’s not just Russia and the USA in the game!Just look at the queue of Russia against the other nations that could reach more than 100 while other nations didn’t even have 1! Either this problem is solved or everyone plays with Russia to blow up all the other nations in easy mode. If several posts were open to denounce a nation that is too powerful in certain areas it’s not for the sake of scenery but for it to change, apparently it doesn’t bother the devs that all the other nations get blown up on the ground and in the air barely spot

4 Likes

Right now on 13.0 in GRB it’s total hell, queues are 5-7 minutes long, Gaijins have created a huge problem. Nobody wants to play against KH-38MT.

This game is insanely bias. Down to the core Russias military is a joke IRL this game is a cope by the Russian And german devs. Why is it Germans and Russia are always 100% in my experience on the same team? Why is it Russia gets prototype vehicles from the 2020s? Why Are KH38S in the game wheb there is no actually proof they exist other than on paper? Lol

why do they have different win rates at every br then?
image
if they are always in the same team they would have the exact same winrate, which they dont

why is the US getting the T95?

1 Like

I said i my experience 100% of my Top Tier Games the bias Duo is always together

Have you ever considered that the majority of less effective players are simply people that bought the idea of playing your nation’s vehicles e.g., M1A2 Abrams and so on, where the same people buy the highest possible vehicle without knowledge of the game and it’s stomped alive by more experienced players that don’t care about experiencing something less than broken than a Leopard 2A7V or overwhelm matches with T-80BVM,

I don’t get, since when Russia got a prototype from 2020? 2S38 if you mean, it’s not a prototype it’s a production vehicle, it’s in service. This is the type of line of thought in the Forums that I don’t like, the Caernarvon02’s line of thought everything but Western military tech actually works and Eastern is simply dreams and hopes, the combat module from the 2S38 is inspired by another combat module used in a coastal defence ship of the Russian navy using similar cannon but in a more simplified and smaller system to fit into a chassis.

I won’t argue regarding the whole dump on fire that is the Kh-38MT existance or not that MythicPi brought to life, I actually agree with him but I believe the Kh-38MT is not a weapon but a designation of family of weapons based in infra-red and inertial guidance systems of the Kh-38, which helps his argument that the picture he provides is of the Kh-38ME.

So no, it doesn’t prove and at the moment is never going to be proven that Russian bias exists when nations like China barely scratches a battle rating changes with vehicles like the Type 59 and Type 69 having proper weapons and capability to have a battle rating increase, or maybe the ItPsV 90 still at battle rating 8.7 despite other less effective Swedish vehicles have the opposite threatment.

If you disagree with my opinion, then prove me wrong, give me or everyone with same opinion as mine data of this Russian bias where Russian vehicles is overperforming over others and this is not tin foil hats’ ideas.

1 Like

Oh no .5% difference your a joke bro go rub daddy putins feet some more 😂 like the moderators and the Devs of this game

Good, 13.0 GRB should be long queues, stop running CAS and play 12.0 instead.

@Mujahidin
There’s zero reason for me to play Soviets when other tech trees are more interesting and better.
The only reason I’d play top BR Soviets is to finish getting the final helicopter I want.

In one breath you say russias military is a joke irl, then lament why they are getting more modern vehicles than other nations to compete.

Either you dont buy into your propaganda, or suffer from cognative dissonance.

3 Likes

Your post is calling vehicles a joke, then providing evidence that proves that claim in-game.

The more modern a vehicle is for a BR vs the other vehicles of that BR, the worse that vehicle is, AKA the vehicle is “a joke”.

Your entire post is just proving that their vehicles are inferior in-game.
If Soviet tech tree vehicles were as superior as you claim, the BRs of their older equipment would be higher than the BRs of newer equipment of other tech trees as a rule.

Also win rate is a metric of skill not vehicle capability.

Your entire post is just defending Russian equipment, and proving their equipment is inferior without you realizing it.

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

Another person that can’t understand simple statistics

2 Likes

@HOMINUSNOCTURNO-live
Weird how I defend American equipment and your post implies USA is Russia…
The tech tree is Soviet, and your post is projecting your defense of equipment onto me instead of admitting that said equipment is inferior.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but American equipment is superior to your precious Soviet tech tree equipment.

My 1990s Abrams matches and even slightly exceeds the capabilities of your 2010s 90M.

Keep pushing propaganda though, you’ll certainly beat us Americans defending American equipment if your posts keep saying 2+2=6.

Also the only tech trees with prototype ground vehicles for 11.7 and 12.0 lineups are China, USA, Sweden, Britain, Germany, France, and Italy. Soviets only have production equipment.

you mean this KH-38ML that clearly isnt mounted to a jet?

or this other KH-38?

or maybe this one?

1 Like