Still a MBT vs a IFV chassis, the firepower of all of the above was still vastly superior to the CFVs leading attacks.
However, the skill of Bradley crews in the gulf war was vastly superior to even the Republican Guard tank crews, with Bradley crews actually exploiting the weakness of T series tanks and the RG deployments to defeat them.
It turns out that when your enemy sports better optics and mobility its not optimal to just entrench and stare out into the desert.
Yes, telling that to him would be perfect.
Either way the enemies would have a big upper hand due to much better tech.
Have the new planned plane battle rankings been withdrawn? Will I no longer be able to skip clickbaits?
Then go back in time and tell them to buy west tech to have a leverage when time comes.
I think glazing over that is bit too cringe, even for a nation that hasn’t won a war in a century.
I guess everything counts.
If stating facts is glazing to you then i don’t think you belong in this forum.
I’m not arguing those aren’t the facts, only that it doesn’t really prove your stuff is good when you’re fighting seriously outdated tech.
They are not even live yet what are you smoking?
They usually do an updated BR changes list 1-2 weeks after they post the initial list, only after that do they go live.
Yesterday everything was crossed out.
strange, it’s completely fine for me.
Although earlier this morning a friend also had similar things happen in the BR changes doc. Probably either google docs being buggy or Gaijin being Gaijin I guess.
I still see it like before
The Russian bias still exists, I dropped two 500kg bombs on a KV-2 and it didn’t die despite being within the assured ditruption radius… This tells you that the Russians still have the ‘magic armour’.
so whats about german bias then
i had a tiger 2 survive a 1000lb bomb that directly imbacted him
In my games, the Tiger 2s are all blown up… But at that BR, I use bombs of 1000kg with a blast radius of 20 metres.
It is already known that the west is advanced so quit defending Russia for once and face these facts, also after the collapse of the soviet union, russia has finally started implementing them in their tanks.
He did not defend Russia stuff ? I mean if you actually bother to read what he said you would know that but well , didn’t expect much anyway. Still don’t understand how a war happened like a few decades ago matter in a discussion about a video game
And did you read what i said? It was all facts but he still chose to say “Muh they did not have thermals” Well no shit because they were behind the west in that kind of tech??
I have no idea.
But was he wrong ? He got a point and his point was not “Western tech le bad , USSR tech le good” Maybe if you actually stop coping and calm down a bit , you can understand. He even said that it is not wrong , also nice edit , still prove my point that you didn’t even bother to read what other person said , even if it is literally two line of texts.
But was i wrong?
Did not edit anything from i said earlier.
Coming from the person that insulted someone’s mother in video game forum.